Nope...AV is upfront with his beliefs. What you see is straight up AV. And with backed up by scripture, he believes.He is just playing with you. There is always a grain of truth in what he says.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nope...AV is upfront with his beliefs. What you see is straight up AV. And with backed up by scripture, he believes.He is just playing with you. There is always a grain of truth in what he says.
Nope...AV is upfront with his beliefs. What you see is straight up AV. And with backed up by scripture, he believes.
Really? That is a lot of chalk. How long did it take for all of the organisms to die?Nope.
I use to believe the earth was 6,000 years old. But I was challenged to study the evidence and that helped me to better understand the Bible and God's word to us. God wants us to know what He has done. He wants us all to come to a saving knowledge of the truth. You can believe what you want based on the information that you have. We all work out our own salvation with fear and trembling. For me I just want people to know that Adam & Eve, Abraham Noah & David were real people. That is enough for me just to accomplish that.I can assure you that people believed the Flood was global LONG before I was ever born.
I hope so. I hope no one ever gets scammed by those bots.In the case of Creationism or the Flood, I can eat a chatbox for breakfast as well.
Not me...I've been freed from that kind of trajectory. Just say'n!We all work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.
Correct, that is why I tend to stay with Moses. He uses plain language and he doe not use riddles like the prophets do. Only Jesus can add to what we receive from Moses. Numbers 12:8 "With him I speak face to face, clearly and not in riddles; he sees the form of the LORD. Why then were you not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?”This isn't about parables and riddles.
This thread is about the Flood.
If you do not need salvation, then I rejoice and I am glad for you. For me, science can only do so much. I need more than what man and the world have to offer. I see the horrendous things people are having to endure and I thank God that He is there to rescue, save, heal, and deliver us out of harms way.Not me...I've been freed from that kind of trajectory. Just say'n!
I do not have any problem with what you say. I have told you that many times. It is what you do not say.Use it all you want to "verify" what I, or anyone else says, and see how that works out.
They were going by the information they had and what they had to work with. I have no problem with Bishop Ussher and his book. Although it is more reference than something you an actually read. He does a wonderful job of talking about the last 6,000 years.I can assure you that people believed the Flood was global LONG before I was ever born.
According to chatbot: "As an artificial intelligence language model, I don't hold beliefs or opinions on matters such as the occurrence of a global flood. It is not within my programming to take sides or express personal views on any topic. My role is to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability based on the available data and knowledge."So Chatbox is against a global flood?
I do not have any problem with what you say. I have told you that many times. It is what you do not say.
They were going by the information they had and what they had to work with. I have no problem with Bishop Ussher and his book. Although it is more reference than something you an actually read. He does a wonderful job of talking about the last 6,000 years.
According to chatbot: "As an artificial intelligence language model, I don't hold beliefs or opinions on matters such as the occurrence of a global flood. It is not within my programming to take sides or express personal views on any topic. My role is to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability based on the available data and knowledge."
Dangerous too.
Getting your theology from a Chatbox is like ... well ...
Would you want your surgeon to get his information from a Chatbox, before he is about to remove your appendix?
Uh, no, the Grand Canyon was not cut through soft mud after the flood. The walls would not have stayed vertical.The canyon was likely cut by the massive floodwaters as they drained into the sea. The flood reshaped the ocean floor so that the water cut through like a knife through butter. A great deal of research has been done on this and the arguments are compelling. In reality, no one was there to see it so it is impossible to prove beyond any doubt.
Sorry, canyons are cut be moving water, not by water pressure in a pipe.I use to design and sell sprinkler systems. Everything was based on water pressure. We would loan people a water pressure gauge to go home and check their water pressure. It was usually 50 or 60 psi. But I could do nothing until I knew what that water pressure was. It takes a LOT of water pressure to carve out the grand canyon. A little bit of pressure and a lot of time are just not the same. Because of the law of diminishing returns.
Perhaps you didn't get the memo? Even flood geologists have long given up that these layers were caused in a global flood. See https://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/Flood geology.pdf , for instance.Thanks, just one more bit of evidence that the geologist time line is incorrect.
Science opens a window into how God Creates new life forms. As such, in the world I live in, we are all an activity of God. And when we see that in others (as well as in ourselves) it has a way of changing our perspective of life around us. As a result, in seeing the Divine in them, we treat others with the Love, Compassion, Empathy and with Service that they deserve. For myself, that is the saving grace of God.If you do not need salvation, then I rejoice and I am glad for you. For me, science can only do so much. I need more than what man and the world have to offer. I see the horrendous things people are having to endure and I thank God that He is there to rescue, save, heal, and deliver us out of harms way.
In a broader sense, "salvation" can refer to any kind of deliverance or rescue from harm, danger, or suffering. In this sense, "salvation" can indeed mean healing, as healing can be a form of deliverance from physical, emotional, or spiritual suffering.
Just a little correction, it's the sand and gravel grinding away at the sides of a canyon wall that does the actual work of abrasion. Running water provides the transport of the sand and gravel.Sorry, canyons are cut be moving water, not by water pressure in a pipe.
That strikes me as pretty funny as I imagine what a chatbot would say about embedded maturity (dare I say fake maturity?) and wormholes and such.Do you actually talk to this thing and engage in conversation?
If so, can I get one?
That strikes me as pretty funny as I imagine what a chatbot would say about embedded maturity (dare I say fake maturity?) and wormholes and such.
Yes, you can get free access to a chatbox engine at ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue , for instance .Do you actually talk to this thing and engage in conversation?
If so, can I get one?
"A principle stating that profits or benefits gained from something will represent a proportionally smaller gain as more money or energy is invested in it."The law of diminishing returns only deals with economics, not geology. Neither of you know a thing you're talking about.
Maybe flood geologists don't know about Mt St Helens:Perhaps you didn't get the memo? Even flood geologists have long given up that these layers were caused in a global flood. See https://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/Flood geology.pdf , for instance.