Based on some of the comments I’ve seen, while some may say that they wouldn’t buy inappropriate content for their kids, they couldn’t give a good reason not to.Oh I got this one. There are programs and apps you can use to filter out sexually explicit content.
Would you buy inappropriate content for your kids?
Define what you mean by ugly behavior, and why you think it gives Christians a bad name.This kind of ugly behavior gives Christians a bad name.
That's... well... wishful thinking.The puritan culture doesn't really exist anymore. Christians have a very healthy understanding of sexuality and it's place in society and marriage. Sexuality is not bad, it was created for pleasure and the propegation if the species. Marriage is the place it belongs and where it is most productive in bringing people together.
The whole sex is bad mantra went away a long time ago. There may be an few hangers on, but they are a true outlier anymore.
Based on some of the comments I’ve seen, while some may say that they wouldn’t buy inappropriate content for their kids, they couldn’t give a good reason not to.
I see inappropriate content shops all over the country. Someone is buying.Who buys inappropriate content anymore? Our society is saturated with it.
I see inappropriate content shops all over the country. Someone is buying.
Let me know when you are going to address my point.Antiquing is a popular American pastime.
Define what you mean by ugly behavior, and why you think it gives Christians a bad name.
Thanks
Let me know when you are going to address my point.
Why is that wrong?Book burning in the name of a petty and puritanical morality.
So nothing forthcoming. Thanks.Let me know when you realize I already did.
Perhaps we need a nanny state to step in.Based on some of the comments I’ve seen, while some may say that they wouldn’t buy inappropriate content for their kids, they couldn’t give a good reason not to.
Why is that wrong?
Public schools are nothing of the kind. The US had a higher literacy rate before school became mandatory. They are for producing good workers who believe what they are fed.
Not for produce generations of well educated critical thinking individuals.
Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling
https://www.amazon.com/Dumbing-Down-Curriculum-Compulsory-Anniversary/dp/0865714487
Good answer.It backfires.
Firstly, to burn the book, you must first own the book, which means you've already paid for the book. Buy 1000 copies of "The Joy of Sex" for your bonfire, and all you've done is put a lot of money in Alex Comfort's pocket.... he gets his royalties whether you read the book or not.
Secondly, labeling something "Forbidden" has become the most effective marketing tool in modern capitalism. The minute you label this book as evil and deserving of burning, you're going to inspire scores of people who would never have heard of it to look into it, even if for no other reason than to see for themselves what all the brouhaha is about.
"Thank you Tipper (Gore) and Jesse (Helms), for making sure that as long as there are a few four-letter words on the album, it’ll sell an extra million copies!” -- Steven Tyler
Many people are saying "Who's been babysitting my kids?". I don't think they care as long as the kids aren't bothering them. This is the issue ignored. Internet raising a generation of American children.Library?
Sooner or later parents are going to find out about this internet thing. And they wont be happy.
It backfires.
Firstly, to burn the book, you must first own the book, which means you've already paid for the book. Buy 1000 copies of "The Joy of Sex" for your bonfire, and all you've done is put a lot of money in Alex Comfort's pocket.... he gets his royalties whether you read the book or not.
Secondly, labeling something "Forbidden" has become the most effective marketing tool in modern capitalism. The minute you label this book as evil and deserving of burning, you're going to inspire scores of people who would never have heard of it to look into it, even if for no other reason than to see for themselves what all the brouhaha is about.
"Thank you Tipper (Gore) and Jesse (Helms), for making sure that as long as there are a few four-letter words on the album, it’ll sell an extra million copies!” -- Steven Tyler
Why is that wrong?
That's... well... wishful thinking.
Perhaps you see yourself in that way... but that statement alone of "marriage is the place where [sex] belongs" shows your own limitations (and puritanical background).
Human sexuality is a much wider field than "intercourse". The basic biology behind it, for example, is an important topic... and a prime example of the puritanical outrage against anything "sex".
Just as an example: there is a very good and informative YouTube channel, run by a certified ObGyn, who talks about all things related to sexuality and the human body. Just a while ago, she was notified that an Alaska schoolboard has banned her educational material from being used in schools for "explicit content".
She doesn't show inappropriate contentography. She doesn't teach how to have sex. She talks about the things that happen to your body, your children's bodies when they grow up. She explains how all of this works, what happens, what can happen, what shouldn't happen. She's open and informative. But "explicit". And that's a big No no, because children need to be kept away from knowing these things.
Why? Because they "belong to marriage"? Should a girl have to wait until marriage until she is allowed to know about her own body? Does she have to wait until her mother tells her... who, most likely, adheres to the same puritanical "don't talk about this dirty stuff, it belongs only in marriage" attitude? Does a boy have to rely on his father to talk "men stuff" with him, from the (hurr hurr) "locker room talk" position?
Sexuality is not exclusive to marriage, whatever limits you want to place on it. It is a part of human existence, of all human life. A very influential, important and potentially risky part. And at the same time, a very fun, inspiring and mostly harmless part.
This is where it belongs. This is how it should be approached. And not by a nationwide outrage about a bared female nipple, or the banning of sex-ed at schools because of ickyness.