Asylum Seekers Bring Deadly Covid Strain

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
37,130
13,198
✟1,090,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Methinks refugees are a convenient scapegoat.

After all, they were called murderers and rapists by the former president. Drug dealers. Gang members.

So why not disease carriers?

My formula for immunity;

Mandatory vaccinations--with a few exceptions for those with certain medical contraindications.

Masks where recommended by the CDC.

It's so much easier to deploy prejudice and etnic hatred than deal with the real problem.

If you haven't been vaccinated, you are the problem.

The greatest danger to our reaching herd immunity isn't immigrants. It's the science deniers and conspiracy theorists who spread lies about microchips in the vaccines.
 
Upvote 0

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,429.00
Faith
Atheist
Methinks refugees are a convenient scapegoat.

After all, they were called murderers and rapists by the former president. Drug dealers. Gang members.

So why not disease carriers?

My formula for immunity;

Mandatory vaccinations--with a few exceptions for those with certain medical contraindications.

Masks where recommended by the CDC.

It's so much easier to deploy prejudice and etnic hatred than deal with the real problem.

If you haven't been vaccinated, you are the problem.

The greatest danger to our reaching herd immunity isn't immigrants. It's the science deniers and conspiracy theorists who spread lies about microchips in the vaccines.

Kindly explain how i, who am not vaccinated, but masks, socially distances, and doesn't engage in high risk behaviors am "the problem".

I haven't gotten Covid, i haven't transmitted Covid. I am not a vector of transmission.

The OP has a specific instance in which a family of asylum seekers brought in and transmitted Covid, specifically, the Brazillian strain of Covid. They were not only a vector of transmission, but an entry point for a new strain of the virus to a particular region.

I'm not a fan (by any stretch of the imagination) of Trump (in fact, i was, and remain, a vocal critic). I don't think immigrants have a higher propensity for being criminals than the general population. However, during a pandemic, not having a process to test for Covid and restrict access/quarantine accordingly, they are definitely part of the problem in controlling the disease.

The OP doesn't call out immigrants as the problem, it calls out the policy by which they are being let in without proper restrictions the problem.
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,728
7,756
64
Massachusetts
✟342,516.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Kindly explain how i, who am not vaccinated, but masks, socially distances, and doesn't engage in high risk behaviors am "the problem".
By being a potential vector. Masking, social distancing, and avoiding high risk behaviors reduce the probability of being infected and transmitting but they don't eliminate it. Unvaccinated people who don't take precautions are of course a much larger part of the problem.
I haven't gotten Covid, i haven't transmitted Covid. I am not a vector of transmission.
Unless you've been tested every few days, or have had periodic tests for antibodies, or have been completely isolated, you can't know that.
However, during a pandemic, not having a process to test for Covid and restrict access/quarantine accordingly, they are definitely part of the problem in controlling the disease.
We certainly should be both testing and isolating (as needed) immigrants.
The OP doesn't call out immigrants as the problem, it calls out the policy by which they are being let in without proper restrictions the problem.
That would be a more convincing take if the OP had been accompanied by other posts condemning our failure to test and isolate (as needed) everyone arriving by plane into the US.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Fantine
Upvote 0

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,429.00
Faith
Atheist
By being a potential vector. Masking, social distancing, and avoiding high risk behaviors reduce the probability of being infected and transmitting but they don't eliminate it. Unvaccinated people who don't take precautions are of course a much larger part of the problem.

Unless you've been tested every few days, or have had periodic tests for antibodies, or have been completely isolated, you can't know that.

We certainly should be both testing and isolating (as needed) immigrants.

That would be a more convincing take if the OP had been accompanied by other posts condemning our failure to test and isolate (as needed) everyone arriving by plane into the US.

Getting the vaccine and engaging in full social behavior makes one a potential risk vector as well. Getting the vaccine reduces the probability of being infected and transmitting but it doesn't eliminate it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fantine
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
37,130
13,198
✟1,090,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Any American who is not doing everything he or she can to prevent getting sick and transmitting that disease to others is part of the problem.

As for the article, "Asylum Seekers Bring Deadly COVID strain," the appropriate response should not be to blame Biden's border policy, which he is dealing with as we speak.

The appropriate response should be: "I am glad I got the vaccine and following CDC guidelines," or, "I DON'T have the vaccine. I am going to run, not walk, to the pharmacist and get the vaccine today--and I will also follow CDC guidelines."

Yes, I am angry. 81% of the residents of my county are unvaccinated, and that means that everywhere I go 81% of the residents are showing callous disregard for me, my neighbors, and my community because of completely irrational fears or rebelliousness.

If Joe Biden did not act so decisively to end COVID, we would probably have at least twice as many cases as we do (64 million compared to 32 million.) But nine months of disinformation, rebelliousness, and disregard for Americans' safety by the previous president has taken its toll, and preventing those who are still in his thrall from doing the right thing.

Brazilian immigrants are not the main problem. In my county, the 81% who aren't vaccinated are.

I got my second Pfizer shot February 24, along with my husband.
 
Upvote 0

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,429.00
Faith
Atheist
Any American who is not doing everything he or she can to prevent getting sick and transmitting that disease to others is part of the problem.

As for the article, "Asylum Seekers Bring Deadly COVID strain," the appropriate response should not be to blame Biden's border policy, which he is dealing with as we speak.

The appropriate response should be: "I am glad I got the vaccine and following CDC guidelines," or, "I DON'T have the vaccine. I am going to run, not walk, to the pharmacist and get the vaccine today--and I will also follow CDC guidelines."

Yes, I am angry. 81% of the residents of my county are unvaccinated, and that means that everywhere I go 81% of the residents are showing callous disregard for me, my neighbors, and my community because of completely irrational fears or rebelliousness.

If Joe Biden did not act so decisively to end COVID, we would probably have at least twice as many cases as we do (64 million compared to 32 million.) But nine months of disinformation, rebelliousness, and disregard for Americans' safety by the previous president has taken its toll, and preventing those who are still in his thrall from doing the right thing.

Brazilian immigrants are not the main problem. In my county, the 81% who aren't vaccinated are.

I got my second Pfizer shot February 24, along with my husband.

Not immediately responding to the vaccine propaganda campaign to rush to be first in line to get a vaccine based on a new technology (first approved vaccine using mRNA technology) that has unknown long term health impacts isn't "callous disregard for you, your neighbors, and your community". I will certainly agree that those who have not modified their social interactions and taken efforts to reduce transmission/contact are putting others at risk. Your anger is misplaced.

The vaccines are a risk tradeoff. They lower the risk of infection/transmission/hospitalization due to Covid, but have both known and unknown side effects. Masking, social distancing, and social limiting don't come attached to risks. Certainly, if one is in a profession which involves(or otherwise engages in) extensive human contact, then getting the vaccine seems like a sensible calculation. If one, does not have extensive contact outside of their own social/family unit, then the calculus changes.

Biden didn't "decisively act to end Covid". He helped manage the roll out of the vaccination program, which is but one aspect of managing the pandemic. As other posters have pointed out, it's not just immigration at the southern border which is an unchecked vector coming into this country. Processes haven't been put into place at other entry points, either, so vaccinations or not, all of the variants of Covid have plenty of entry points. Putting all of our eggs into the vaccination basket isn't the same as developing a comprehensive plan to work to eradicate the disease.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,556
6,068
64
✟337,382.00
Faith
Pentecostal
I've read a lot of the relevant scientific studies; I've also written some of them. I was on a call today with the CDC and most of the public health labs and academic centers that are monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in the US. I have a pretty good idea what people are thinking in this space.

Correct.

Correct, but we have no idea of how likely complete vaccine escape is or on what time scale it might occur. As it happens, we're already seeing the same mutations occurring over and over again, and so far none have been in that category, so it's quite possible that complete vaccine escape is not likely.

Strict control meaning what? If a true vaccine escape variant appears (assuming it doesn't appear in the US -- we've already contributed our share of alarming mutations), I'm fine with having mandatory quarantine for anyone entering the US, as long as it includes everyone, citizen or not. Good luck getting that through the American political process, though -- we can't even get Americans to wear a piece of cloth on their face, so I doubt we're going to convince them to let themselves be confined for two weeks if they take a trip abroad. And those measures would need to be back-stopped with ongoing intensive test-and-trace programs (which are also politically unacceptable in much of the country), mandatory isolation and quarantine in locations where vaccine-escape variants have gotten in (and they will get in), coupled with local mandatory social distancing and masking. If we as a nation had the political will, we could do as well as other countries have but I see no evidence that we have the necessary will and discipline.

That's all dealing with a hypothetical situation, though. Where we are now, asylum-seekers are a negligible contribution to the progress of the pandemic in the US.

It's interesting you call out Americans for not wanting to wear masks while.at the same time wanting to excuse illegal immigration which brings a greater risk into the country. It's a g ad scratcher.
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,728
7,756
64
Massachusetts
✟342,516.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It's interesting you call out Americans for not wanting to wear masks while.at the same time wanting to excuse illegal immigration which brings a greater risk into the country. It's a g ad scratcher.
(1) I have said nothing about excusing illegal immigration. (2) illegal immigration is not bringing a greater risk into the country than we've already got.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,579
11,396
✟437,402.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Any American who is not doing everything he or she can to prevent getting sick and transmitting that disease to others is part of the problem.

As for the article, "Asylum Seekers Bring Deadly COVID strain," the appropriate response should not be to blame Biden's border policy, which he is dealing with as we speak.

Is he? What's the plan here?

I haven't heard a peop out of the administration other than to downplay the issue in weeks.
 
Upvote 0

stevil

Godless and without morals
Feb 5, 2011
7,034
5,808
✟249,915.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The "filthy disease-spreading vermin" schtick has been used quite often in the past in order to argue against immigration-- legal or illegal.

It's not often that we get a actual disease to attach to the routine... so there's that.
If I were a blatantly racist person I would be using this as an excuse to complain against immigration.
In fact I would then go out of my way to go onto the internet, start up threads and spread the word.

However if I were a decent person, I'd instead go out of my way to promote people getting vaccinated and wearing masks, and social distancing, I'd be voting in presidents, prime ministers, governors etc that support these things. I'd also be looking to counteract people who are on the internet and promoting anti vaccination, anti masks, anti social distancing with facts.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums