- Jul 13, 2018
- 5,153
- 1,654
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
I suppose. It would also curtail those who are discussing the ongoing developments and flip flops - and the constitutional fight to come over this unconstitutional mandate. Those are issues worth discussing.Likewise
Today, this vaccine- 2 years in when almost everyone has been exposed by now, and when millions are already recovered from previous infection. We all know that you don't take a vaccine for something from which you have recovered. Look at the CDC page for measles - you are exempt if you had measles (unless they have scrubbed that too).
Still here:
CDC considers you protected from measles if you have written documentation (records) showing at least one of the following:
- You received two doses of measles-containing vaccine, and you are a(n) —
- school-aged child (grades K-12)
- adult who will be in a setting that poses a high risk for measles transmission, including students at post-high school education institutions, healthcare personnel, and international travelers.
- You received one dose of measles-containing vaccine, and you are a(n) —
- preschool-aged child
- adult who will not be in a high-risk setting for measles transmission.
- A laboratory confirmed that you had measles at some point in your life.
- A laboratory confirmed that you are immune to measles.
- You were born before 1957.
Another year it could be a pill that would be mandated for all. Or any number of interventions if this stands.
Upvote
0