Subduction Zone
Regular Member
No, I think you aren't reading what I wrote. I mentioned how supporters said it was stolen by Russia - not that they didn't interfere. Yes, there is a difference. See below:
Let's see...last election. Hillary said it was stolen by Russia. I mean NONE of her supporters brought into that either.
Sorry, but maybe it is you that is confused. We heard for years about how Trump colluded with Russia. Hillary blamed Russia - among a bunch of other stuff.
lol if you seriously need a citation? You have been living under a rock for a while now. It's not that hard to find.
Now, now. Just because you are wrong is not an excuse to get mad. People accused Trump of collusion. They did not try to overturn an election. There is a big difference. And are you denying that there was Russian interference for Trump? If you are I am not the one that has been living under a rock. Here are the facts that both sides agree on. Well, the honest people agree with them. There was Russian interference. Even Republicans found that. The interference was in support of Trump. Donald Trump said some very stupid things that would have been illegal if he did them. He of course said "it was a joke" his constant lame excuse when he is caught doing that. There was no evidence of him colluding with Russia. But there was clear evidence of obstruction of justice. He could have been impeached on that alone, but unfortunately impeachment is a political action and not a legal one. He would almost certainly have lost a legal suit, but as President he is protected from that. The Democrats could see that he would not lose a political suit so they did not impeach him for that.
Upvote
0