There's Asimov's Adage again. Quote by Isaac Asimov: “Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread...”
How about this, if you can prove Wikipedia a valid source on the pages you are using it to site, then we will talk about it.
If you make a statement back it up with the scientific method. That is all I was asking of the other poster and you butted in asking me to back up with evidence using the scientific method that he didn't have evidence. Again you are asking me to prove someone else did not have evidence instead of reading back a page and realizing on your own that no evidence eas given by the other poster. This does not seem odd to you? So anyway, I am exhausted and frustrated with the posts from you that don't seem to be fully reading the thread at hand. Fully read all posts in the thread so when you make a comment it sounds like you are on the same page. It is frus rating to deal.with your posts, this is your last warning. In fact since I am not at a computer I cannot quote this entire conversation to bring you up to speed so I am just going to temporarily block you for a few days to let this air out then I will schedule your unblocling in a few days when I am able to help more with your posts. I am on a phone so I can't do much.
I can see from some of your other posts that you are finding several of these exchanges quite frustrating. You probably realise this is a feeling that is present on both sides of the discussion. You might wish to consider the following:
the burden of proof does not lie on the person making the claim to prove the source is a valid source? I like conservapedia, but I don't quote it in debate. Here let me help you find sources, I am just in a giving mood today....
sorry sir I have you on block so I won't be adressing your posts, but I did post one more attempt at getting the poster to validate his sources in a respectable manner in my last post, I hope that helps. Take care.
well I should say I used to use it, I am not as conservative anymore. I am sort of in the middle politically speaking, I for instance think a wall is not a loving thing, keeping poor people out, is not a charitable action. I also think there should be some regulation of large business, which is sort of anti capitalistic. But other than that I agree with the rest. But unfortunately I don't fit the cookie cutter politics of today. I do recommend conservapedia, if all you do is read wikipedia. It's is sort of the opposite in some ways. I don't read news but if I did I would choose to read both liberal and conservative news sources, hopefully the truth is somewhere in the middle to two extremes. Everyone has bias, so if you assume there is left or right leaning bias, and you study to see it, you can relatively sift through content easily as see if a news source is leaning one way or the other. Wikipedia is really left leaning. Which I don't agree with either. But is just also happens to be very error ridden as well, due to being publicly edited by any one who logs in.
