I guess you felt the urge to take me off of ignore, to address my blatant lies, lol. I admit sometimes I post an image or two from a KJV only site, that I didn't fact check. But I can verify that the majority are mostly true, there may be an exaggeration but not much. And most of them I have posted you have not been able to properly refute.
Quotations from the church fathers are part of the critical apparatus.
I don't know what this is, can you explain how church fathers quoting from strictly byzantine text types does not support the byzantine text?
The same can be said for the unreliable websites you keep quoting. In fact, those are even worse.
this is a quote from wikipedia, since you trust it:
"
In Oct 15, 1862, Kallinikos Hieromachos, wrote a letter, were it stated that:
...I do myself declare to all men by this letter, that the Codex of the Old and New Testaments, together with the Epistle of Barnabas and of the Shepherd Hermas, which was abstracted by Dr. Tischendorf from the Greek monastery of Mount Sinai, is a work of the hands of the unwearied Simonides himself. Inasmuch as I myself saw him in 1843 ... in the month of February writing it in Athos...Dr. Tischendorf, coming to the Greek monastery of Sinai in 1844, in the month of May (if my memory does not deceive me), and remaining there several days, and getting into his hands, by permission of the librarian, the codex we are speaking of, and perusing and re-perusing it frequently, abstracted secretly a small portion of it, but left the largest portion in the place where it was, and departed undisturbed...And I know yet further,
that the codex also was cleaned with lemon-juice, professedly for the purpose of cleaning its parchments, but in reality in order to weaken the freshness of the letters, as was actually the case."
Codex Sinaiticus - Textus Receptus
