Well we all know "polls" are super reliable.
I remember when the "polls" said Hillary would win by a landslide.
Yes, they were very reliable for people who understand them. That is why they are and continue to be used.
Upvote
0
Well we all know "polls" are super reliable.
I remember when the "polls" said Hillary would win by a landslide.
Apparently not to reliable when Hillary was polled to win by a LANDSLIDE.Yes, they were very reliable for people who understand them. That is why they are and continue to be used.
Apparently not to reliable when Hillary was polled to win by a LANDSLIDE.
Hmmm, maybe the people back then didn't " understand " them".
No confusion here.Maybe you don't understand how they work, hence your confusion?
The polls said that a Hillary victory was likely however they were not calling for a wide margin of victory.Apparently not to reliable when Hillary was polled to win by a LANDSLIDE.
Hmmm, maybe the people back then didn't " understand " them".
No confusion here.
You seem confused however.
Polling measures public opinion, not electoral college votes. Going by the results of the election, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump, just like the polls predicted but due to the undemocratic way we elect our presidents, the less popular candidate won.No confusion here.
You seem confused however.
Obama?Good for them! Like they would vote for The Most Popular President in all Time anyway.
Obama?
whoa whoa whoa. Back up a second here. Do I understand you to say that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote just like the polls said she would?Polling measures public opinion, not electoral college votes. Going by the results of the election, more people voted for Hillary than they did for Trump, just like the polls predicted but due to the undemocratic way we elect our presidents, the less popular candidate won.
If I were to use the "reality and fact" based posts you've provided here as a rubric for what constitutes a good president, I'm not sure our lists would really look all that much the same.Obama barely makes the top 43 list.
I think that we've already established that some type of dysfunction has set in here.Obama barely makes the top 43 list.
Which proves “Poe’s Law”.If I were to use the "reality and fact" based posts you've provided here as a rubric for what constitutes a good president, I'm not sure our lists would really look all that much the same.
Merrick Garland's nomination was handled exactly in accordance with the policies then in effect.
You mean the 450 million he got from his father?
That’s a new one. Citation please
It's $413m, and that's the value in today's dollars:
Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
So when he received the funds it was NOT 400 million. It is just stated that way as part of a politically charged bias. it sounds better to the haters.