- Nov 15, 2006
- 43,920
- 14,014
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
My position in another thread is not the topic of the thread
Were you in the Navy?First rule in public relations is when asked a question, people will translate a “no comment” as “yes.”
Were you in the Navy?
(I'm breaking my own rule about not addressing IDs, profile pics, etc., it's a sincere and friendly inquiry.)
Perhaps not, but pointing out your inconsistent standards for judging the credibility of a source is a perfectly legitimate response to your attack on that source’s credibility.
If you don’t like folks pointing out your inconsistencies, maybe don’t be so inconsistent.
Thread isn’t about me. No matter how much you try to deflect it.
I notice there is no other response to what I posted except complaints about me.
Must be in the right track.
I'm not trying to make it about you. I'm trying to understand the rationale for the criticism you levied.
Perhaps you can just clear up the confusion once and for all: When is the NYT's use of unnamed sources "familiar" with a subject credible and when does it constitute "unverifiable gossip from a national gossip rag"? What factors lead to those assessments?