Trump admin cuts $60 million from Planned Parenthood

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,757
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,803.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The statement was concerning "woman's reproductive health", c-sections are part of a woman's reproductive health that require a doctor. Just because something isn't "a natural part of child birth" doesn't mean it isn't part of a woman's reproductive health.

-CryptoLutheran

Is the baby growing in the womb part of her reproductive health?
 
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,354
Clarence Center NY USA
✟237,637.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Perhaps I didn't. If women must get abortions, I'd prefer they were done in clean, accredited facilities.
Ringo

I wasn't aware that anyone was forcing women to get abortions. I doubt that is legal. Forcing women to get an abortion does not seem to be in line with the idea of pro choice. I suggest that any woman should call law enforcement if someone is insisting that they must get an abortion.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FireDragon76
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,757
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,803.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
  • Agree
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,132
3,089
✟405,713.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Don't waste time trying to appeal to the Left's sense of morality about the unborn. Now they're showing they don't even care about babies after they're born: https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.97ecc0e7c4ee

Every democrat running for president voted against a bill protecting them.
Okay. Now I am really getting upset. Honestly, this is something that I would be willing to disfellowship from someone if they supported this murder.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,757
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,803.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Okay. Now I am really getting upset. Honestly, this is something that I would be willing to disfellowship from someone if they supported this murder.

When abortion has been justified for as long as it has, it only makes sense that the proponents of it try to push the boundaries to this point. After this, the age of the baby will go up and up. Maybe even up to age 18 on the basis that the toddler/teenager has to be allowed to die in order to protect the mental health of the mother if the child is becoming too big of a burden for her.
 
  • Prayers
Reactions: Gigimo
Upvote 0

Ringo84

Separation of Church and State expert
Jul 31, 2006
19,228
5,252
A Cylon Basestar
Visit site
✟121,289.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I wasn't aware that anyone was forcing women to get abortions. I doubt that is legal. Forcing women to get an abortion does not seem to be in line with the idea of pro choice. I suggest that any woman should call law enforcement if someone is insisting that they must get an abortion.

Where did I say anything about "forcing" women to get abortions?

When someone says "If you must do something, I'd rather...", it doesn't mean "I'm forcing you"; it means "if you insist on doing this, for whatever reason, I would prefer [conditions]"
Ringo
 
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟188,109.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Which will only serve to hurt women who need health care, but I know that Donny doesn't care a fig about that.
Ringo
Elective abortion, which makes up the vast majority, is not "women who need health care"... it's a form of birth control.
 
Upvote 0

RestoreTheJoy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 13, 2018
5,153
1,654
Passing Through
✟457,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Saying that women's health care is PP's core mission and that abortion is one of those services is not "backtracking". It's consistent with what I've been saying: that cancer screening, STI testing and birth control - all non abortion - are services that PP renders to women across the country.

It's interesting that you seem to think you know more about Planned Parenthood than its president.
Ringo
Planned Parenthood does not provide cancer screenings. This has been debunked several times. It provides referrals. Great - send the money to those who actually provide services.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...d-provides-mammograms/?utm_term=.db4be1ea0d09

And yes, every service is counted independently in order to reduce the appearance of the prevalence of abortion. Even a woman who obtains an abortion will have multiple services, in order to reduce the percentage of abortion services provided. She will receive contraception (for afterward), anesthesia, referrals, consults...all "separate services".
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ringo84

Separation of Church and State expert
Jul 31, 2006
19,228
5,252
A Cylon Basestar
Visit site
✟121,289.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,757
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,803.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Citation needed.
Ringo

U.S. Abortion Statistics

WHY DO ABORTIONS OCCUR?
Also interesting to note is where most abortions take place, which just happens to be in the most democrat-leaning areas of the country, making it more about choices being made rather than being about the "woman's health":

  • In 2014, the highest percentage of pregnancies were aborted in the District of Columbia(38%), New York (33%), and New Jersey (30%). The lowest percentage of pregnancies were aborted in Utah (5%), South Dakota (4%), and Wyoming (<2%). (AGI abortion data + CDC birth data).
  • In 2015, approximately 35% of all pregnancies in New York City (excluding spontaneous miscarriages) ended in abortion (CDC).
 
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟188,109.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Citation needed.
Ringo
It's called common sense Ringo.... woman gets pregnant by having unprotected sex and decides she doesn't want the pregnancy and gets an abortion to move on with her life. Elective, not urgent health care....
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,132
3,089
✟405,713.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,757
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,803.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
That's a lot of words for "I have no proof".
Ringo

Dude, just read post #92. The citation you asked for is right there.
 
Upvote 0

FanthatSpark

LImited Understanding
Oct 3, 2013
2,143
579
✟78,811.00
Faith
Non-Denom
@Ringo84 Sir, I get you in your passion. However, the separation of funds from a big ole slush fund is for over-site by you, the people. A thing you may not be aware of is PP takes money out tax funds to give to election funds . In hypothetical picture it looks like this...

Trump campaign funding paid in part from PP taken from the tax payer. Now, you paid taxes but do not support a Trump. Well you just paid "in part" some of his campaign funding weather you like it or not.

Thus, the 60 million was taken so they can not do this with the peoples tax.

Sir, it is not PP as a whole that is responsible for lobbying with tax payer dollars as others do this thing as well. Thus, it takes your choice of where your tax dollars go by the top echelon . In time, this scandal will be brought forth on TV. If you want proof right now of this ya got to research in places you might not want to go. A good start is campaign funding of congress on both sides of the isle and see how many PP's come up. This is not their money but yours.

Hope this helps good sir.
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,132
3,089
✟405,713.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
At any rate, as a Lutheran I do not believe secular law has to be based on religious laws from the Old Testament.
I agree with your statement. Secular law does not have to be based on the biblical commands by God. However, when a secular law legalizes wickedness, it ought to be your duty as a Christian to place God's Word above the law of man. To suggest otherwise would be to say that Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were wrong for refusing to obey the secular laws commanding them commit idolatry. It is part of "taking up your cross" and being a disciple of Christ.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,132
3,089
✟405,713.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You might want to re-read Exodus 21:22-25,

"When people who are fighting injure a pregnant woman so that there is a miscarriage, and yet no further harm follows, the one responsible shall be fined what the woman’s husband demands, paying as much as the judges determine. If any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe."

The harm in question is harm to the pregnant woman. A miscarriage, with no more harm than that, results in a fine; if there is harm [to the woman] then the judge can determine the outcome, up to and including life for life.

-CryptoLutheran
Your translation is wrong.

"In favor of the NIV translation are the following arguments:

1. There is a Hebrew verb for miscarry or lose by abortion or be bereaved of the fruit of the womb, namely, shakal. It is used nearby in Exodus 23:26, "None shall miscarry (meshakelah) or be barren in your land." But this word is NOT used here in Exodus 21:22-25.

2. Rather the word for birth here is "go forth" (ytsa'). "And if her children go forth . . ." This verb never refers to a miscarriage or abortion. When it refers to a birth it refers to live children "going forth" or "coming out" from the womb. For example, Genesis 25:25, "And the first came out (wyetse') red, all of him like a hairy robe; and they called his name Esau." (See also v. 26 and Genesis 38:28-30.)

So the word for miscarry is not used but a word is used that elsewhere does not mean miscarry but ordinary live birth. "
The Misuse of Exodus 21:22–25 by Pro-Choice Advocates
 
Upvote 0