I see the facts of the Bible, and I know them well,
I am not doubting that you think you know the facts of the Bible.
But many people can claim this kind of thing. That does not mean they are correct. The truth of God's Word will back them up in what they say.
You said:
but it is good to learn the intent of Scripture and not live by the letter as you are suggesting 2 Corinthians 3:6.
You are ripping that verse out of it's context to prove an unbiblical line of thinking.
Paul is contrasting between the Old Law (the written Torah) with the New Covenant teachings that were by the Spirit.
"Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." (2 Corinthians 3:6).
The letter is in reference of the Old Law in how it could kill you because there death penalties attached for breaking certain laws within the Law of Moses. He made us ministers, not of the letter (i.e. the Torah, Old Covenant, Old Contract), but he made us ministers of the New Testament. So this verse is not suggesting what you are suggesting.
We can see the contrast is between the Old and the New.
#1. Not with ink (the Torah, OT), vs.
but with the Spirit of the living God (New Covenant) (verse 3).
#2. Not in tables of stone (the Torah, OT), vs.
but in fleshy tables of the heart (New Covenant) (verse 4).
#3. Not of the letter (the Torah, OT), vs.
but of the spirit (New Covenant) (verse 6).
#4. The ministration of death, written
and engraven in stones... the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses (the Torah, OT), vs.
the ministration of the spirit (New Covenant) verse 8).
#5. The ministration of condemnation (the Torah, OT), vs.
the ministration of righteousness (New Covenant) (verse 9).
You said:
The Question "if" makes the suggestion hypothetical but not untrue. It becomes hypothesis because it never happened.
David was on a downward path and God went to extra lengths to stop this [finally sending his prophet] and he [God] was victorious, showing that it was God's intent to save David. Since God was so intent on saving David it is hard for me to believe that he wasn't already saved but he needed David to do his part for Ezekiel 18 makes it clear that there is no escape without repentance under God's law.
So while the letter says he is not saved the Spirit says he is saved because I have no intention of losing him.
King David was not saved in his sins of adultery and murder. To say so otherwise is to teach a license for immorality because one is basically saying a person can be like a King David and still be saved (Thereby teaching others that they can sin and still be saved).
#1.
Numbers 35:16-18 says it only takes on act of murder to be a murderer; And
Leviticus 20:10 says it only takes on act of adultery to be an adulterer.
#2. Jesus Himself regarded just looking at woman once as an act of adultery (
Matthew 5:28).
#3. John says, "No murderer has eternal life abiding in them." (
1 John 3:15).
#4.
Proverbs 6:32 says "Whosoever commits adultery with a woman lacks understanding: he that does it destroys his own soul."
#5. Jesus Himself says that just looking at a woman in lust (Which is adultery) is potential for a person to be cast bodily in hell fire (See
Matthew 5:28-30).
#6. David needed to confess of his sin in order to be forgiven (See
Psalms 51).
#7.
1 John 1:9 says if we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
#8.
Revelation 21:8 says, "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." Murderers and whoremongers will be cast into the lake of fire. All liars will be cast into the lake of fire. ALL liars, and not just some. NO murderer has eternal life abiding in them (
1 John 3:15).
As for Ezekiel 18:
Ezekiel 18:24 says,
"But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity,
and doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked
mandoeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die."
Some have suggested that this is talking exclusively of the physical punishment of the Law like capital punishment. But that is not really the case here unless one thinks God is going to send all of Israel to face capital punishment.
For Ezekiel 18:31-32 says,
31 "Rid yourselves of all the offenses you have committed, and get a new heart and a new spirit. Why will you die, people of Israel?
32 For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Sovereign Lord. Repent and live!"
You said:
As it is written, "Whom The Lord loves he rebukes and chastens." See Hebrews 12:6.
Imagine if you will there is a master who has a dog. One day the dog poops on the carpet and so the master lightly smacks the animal and yells at the little guy. The goal is to get the animal to stop pooping hot piles of steamy brownie goodness on his white carpet. The master chastens his dog to correct the animal. To reform the animal. To get the animal to stop pooping. But imagine another master who owns a dog. Except this master owns a dog who has an uncontrollable pooping problem. The master knows the dog has a pooping problem whereby the poor little furry guy cannot help but to release brown tootsie rolls all over his lovely bright carpets. This master yells at the dog and smacks him for pooping on the carpet knowing full well the animal cannot stop pooping.
The second master is kind of like what you believe because you no doubt take the Belief Alone false interpretations on Romans 3:10, Romans 3:23, Romans 7:14-24, and 1 John 1:8 that says we are sinners and we cannot help but to sin and that no believer can overcome sin this side of Heaven (which would even include grievous sin).
For you believe King David was saved in his sins of adultery and murder (Which means you believe that you can tell others that they are saved if they commit such sins) like a King David, correct? For after all, nobody can stop sinning, right? However, the Bible teaches we can overcome grievous sin (See 1 Corinthians 10:13, Romans 13:14, Galatians 5:24, 1 Peter 4:1-2, 2 Corinthians 7:1). In light of these Biblical facts, how do you not see that telling others that King David was saved in his sins of adultery and murder as not teaching a license to sin? For even if you were to tell them they can do these sins temporarily as long as they confess them to God, it is still telling them that they can sin and still be saved on some level (Which is a violation of basic morality). Would not God have to agree with this kind of justification of sin or evil in order for it to work? Can God agree with sin?
What would be the purpose of chastening under this kind of belief?
It would be like chastening a dog with an uncontrollable pooping problem.
It would be cruel of the master to chasten the animal if such were the case.
You said:
There is your conundrum and it makes it unhelpful to hypothesise things that never happened as we may cast doubt and fear on the unlearned that is unnecessary.
The conundrum is your belief that says King David was saved while he committed his sins of adultery and murder. It is self destructive and telling folks this will not lead anyone into living righteously. They will just think they can use an excuse the next time they sin (not worrying about the many warnings in Scripture Jesus warned us about in regards to how sin can destroy our souls - See Matthew 5:28-30, Matthew 6:15, Matthew 12:37, Matthew 25:31-46).