What are you prattling about, you bought up the 3 metre gap. It's not up for debate, is right here in the thread in black and white.
Because you brought up the K-T boundary, but didn’t feel it necessary to inform readers of that 3 meter gap.....
Why do I need to show animals fossilizing "post flood"? I'm citing paleontolgical and geological sources, universities, professors etc. What about you?
I am citing the actual evidence in where not a single animal has been found fossilizing, despite all your professors saying it can happen by those events, yet can’t provide you with a single solitary example. Sorry, empericial observational data (or in this case lack thereof) trumps your professors claims any day. They are strong on claims, but far short of any actual evidence.
All you can present is some nonsensical opinion that goes aginst well understood scientific principals, no evidence, no references. I know I'm not going to convince you because you are too proud you think you might be wrong. You think you know more about fossils than professional paleotologists, more about geology than the world's geologists, more about relativity and physics than the world's physicists and more about genetics than every qualified biologist and institution.
How can I present evidence that fossilization is occurring when it isn’t? That’s your claim you can’t provide evidence for, not mine. I say it isn’t, since you can’t provide a single one beginning fossilization, the evidence supports my claims, not theirs. Surely all your experts based their belief on some type of evidence and not mere claims? Oops, no, they just made claims.
In fact, I don't believe I've ever seen you waiver on your outlandish claims despite being shown multiple and numerous scientific references in every thread you've participated in. How do you expect to be taken seriously if you show such a stubborn reluctance to accept any information contrary to your beliefs? I suppose at the very least these exchanges go some way to expose the inadequacy and shallowness of creationist thinking so they aren't a complete waste of time.
You haven’t shown any evidence, that’s why I am asking for you to show me a single solitary one beginning fossilization. All you have given me is someone you say has studied it, is an expert, yet can’t provide a single example either...
As for other evidence that goes back to your ignoring scientific definitions, which support my claims too, not theirs. That’s why you don’t like to talk about finches.
As there has never been a global flood, as every geologist in the world has attested for the last 200 years (apart from the odd creationist shill of course), and you have absolutely zero evidence of one, this seems a tad hypocritical.
Please put up your evidence for a worldwide flood or shut up.
I’ve given you 73% of the earths surface as sedimentary layers. I’ve given you 99.9% of all fossils found in those layers.
You have given me claims that local floods, streams and lake beds cause fossilization too. But have yet to provide a single bone beginning fossilization in any of these places in recent history we can confirm was not caused by a global flood.
Not even ONE????
Oh, but that’s right, lack of evidence is evidence to an evolutionist. That’s like asking to be shown a single solitary common ancestor that split for any evolutionary tree.