Another Flood Question

[MyGivenNameIsKeith]

No, an asteroid really isn’t scientific when it comes to the dinosaurs. People don’t like to talk about the 3 meter gap that exists before the K-T boundary. A gap in which to date three bones have been found and one set of tracks. Clearly dinosaurs were almost entirely extinct before the asteroid struck. And since 99.9% of all fossils before the three meter gap are found in sedimentary strata.....

Would lead you to believe that the sediment was the very thing that caused their death. Sort of like breathing in ash. The pressure from the impending flood which came after the event would in turn pressurize and entomb the dinos and fossilize them.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

You should read the book written by Cahn. He does a very good job of explaining what a paradigm me. It would be against the rules for me to put a lot of that book here on this forum because of the political content. Or you could read the scientific articles that talks about the new paradigm in evolutionary science. That way you could get a scientific perspective on what a paradigm is and how sciences uses the word. Or just do your own google search if you do not understand the meaning of the word. If you want to read an article in a scientific journal then they expect you to know how to use a dictionary to look up the meaning of words. If you do not know the meaning of the words then you are not going to understand the article that you are trying to read.

We agree, such as the definition of subspecies when evolutionists talk about Darwin’s Finches.....

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Would lead you to believe that the sediment was the very thing that caused their death. Sort of like breathing in ash. The pressure from the impending flood which came after the event would in turn pressurize and entomb the dinos and fossilize them.

Except no dinosaurs are found in the K-T layer or above it, but end 100,000 years before it.

Since no iridium is found in the previous 100,000 years of strata, no mixing occurred.

 

[joshua 1 9]

We agree, such as the definition of subspecies when evolutionists talk about Darwin’s Finches.....

Darwin did that Finch study a long time ago. They have come a long way since then. Now we have to deal with things like the Tarsiar monkey and how to classify them.

 

[joshua 1 9]

The pressure from the impending flood which came after the event would in turn pressurize and entomb the dinos and fossilize them.

The evidence at the Ghost Ranch in New Mexico would indicate a flood.

 

[joshua 1 9]

No it doesn’t.

Take a look at this.

Paradigm, noun

1. a typical example or pattern of something; a pattern or model.
   "society's paradigm of the ‘ideal woman’"
2. a set of linguistic items that form mutually exclusive choices in particular syntactic roles.

Yet people still think a Paradigm is a metaphor and it is not. One is exact and literal and the other is vague and general. That is why they have trouble understanding the Bible.

 

[MyGivenNameIsKeith]

iridium levels are just theory supporting asteroid theory, as are any claims to "know" what happened. Iridium is even said to keep coming up from Earth's core in the sense of volcanic eruptions. There were many things going on at this time that we as observers tend to "put all our eggs in one basket" that pit theories and evidence against each other. I believe the evidence points to many things going on. I tend to think the multiple references in scripture point out these multiple events happening around the same period of time. Fountains of the deep, windows of heaven, also the fact it was the first time it had ever rained. Thus our evidence can show any number of hypotheses and theories which may all be correct.

 

[joshua 1 9]

iridium levels are just theory supporting asteroid theory,

Asteroids or comets are usually a marker. The Bible says there will be signs in the sky. This gives us an exact and a precise date for an event and for an age or era to end or begin. That does not mean the asteroid is a cause, it is just a marker that we can do a test on to come up with an exact date.

I like to use the nano diamond comet. Not as any sort of a cause but as a marker to know when one age or era came to an end and a new age began.

13,000-Year-Old Nanodiamonds Found On Three Continents

"Nanodiamond" Find Supports Comet Extinction Theory

 

[Larniavc]

Yet people still think a Paradigm is a metaphor and it is not. One is exact and literal and the other is vague and general. That is why they have trouble understanding the Bible.

It’s not a metaphor. It is a noun.

 

[Aman777]

Don’t believe you.

I have God's Word for it which AGREES in every way with every discovery of man. What supports your misconception?

 

[Larniavc]

I have God's Word for it which AGREES in every way with every discovery of man. What supports your misconception?

Where is God’s word on Pauli’s exclusion principle?

Where does God’s word agree with that.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Darwin did that Finch study a long time ago. They have come a long way since then. Now we have to deal with things like the Tarsiar monkey and how to classify them.

And Darwin was wrong a long time ago about them being reproductively isolated, hasn’t prevented the biologists from refusing to correct incorrect classifications. So really they haven’t come any ways at all...

“The tarsiers are prosimian (non-monkey) primates. They got their name from the long bones in their feet. They are now placed in the suborder Haplorhini, together with the simians(monkeys).

So it seems they are just as confused, placing non-monkeys together with monkeys.

Kind of like placing humans with monkeys, confusion reigns.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

iridium levels are just theory supporting asteroid theory, as are any claims to "know" what happened. Iridium is even said to keep coming up from Earth's core in the sense of volcanic eruptions. There were many things going on at this time that we as observers tend to "put all our eggs in one basket" that pit theories and evidence against each other. I believe the evidence points to many things going on. I tend to think the multiple references in scripture point out these multiple events happening around the same period of time. Fountains of the deep, windows of heaven, also the fact it was the first time it had ever rained. Thus our evidence can show any number of hypotheses and theories which may all be correct.

I tend to think it happened when the earth “became - hayah” desolate and waste, and darkness became upon the surface of the deep. Before man was even created.

But then that’s why “was” isn’t even listed as a possible meaning in any concordance for hayah, because it means to fall out or to become, a condition of becoming. But people won’t let the works of God declare his glory, instead confining Him to a singular creation.

There have been six creations and five destructions, with man being part of the sixth creation. Soon there will be a sixth destruction followed by a seventh and final creation.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Where is God’s word on Pauli’s exclusion principle?

Where does God’s word agree with that.

It’s the law He wrote to prevent two things from occupying the same space.

It just took Pauli a few years to divine what God had already written long ago.

 

[Larniavc]

It’s the law He wrote to prevent two things from occupying the same space.

It just took Pauli a few years to divine what God had already written long ago.

Oh good grief. You’re literally making this up as you go.

Adorable.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Looks like Justatruthseeker doesn't want to continue conversing with me if it means admitting being incorrect about a minor thing. What a shame, but forbid he ever try to claim that Cro Magnons have ever been portrayed with exaggerated ape features again. I'll make a formal debate challenge out of it if he does.

And Justatruthseeker, I wouldn't have been so stubborn about something like that usually, but you just had to pull the "I'm older than you, I was there, so I know better" card. Few things get on my nerves, and people acting like they know more just by virtue of their age is one of them. I found absolutely no evidence that Cro Magnons have ever been portrayed with exaggerated ape features in a scientific setting, and even children's toys didn't seem to do it. The toy you posted was a Neanderthal toy, and the only source I can find for it are some foreign news outlets and the possibility that it might be a children's toy from 1972... and one that came unpainted, no less https://i.pinimg.com/736x/82/b4/c7/82b4c76650fc8184bc076d68c78ed47d--tar-prehistoric.jpg
Not 100% sure that's a match for your little figurine, but sure looks like it to me.

 

[joshua 1 9]

So it seems they are just as confused, placing non-monkeys together with monkeys.

Opinion keeps changing. They call it a paradigm shift. Right now the whole paradigm of the tree of life is going through a paradigm shift. Because new information is adding another dimension to the tree.

Is evolution selfish or altruistic, depends on who you listen to because they do not agree with each other. Even Harvard professors can not agree on what the theory is. Every 30 years the pendulum starts to swing back in the other direction.

Now they call it social darwinism. The princess wants to be a warrior so we have to adjust our scientific beliefs so we can accommodate her. The germans think that they are the perfect race so they have to adjust their social science to accommodate their beliefs. People are worried that their race may really be inferior so we have to eliminate race theory and replace it with a theory on how culture explains everything. As Cher says: "& the beat goes on"

 

[joshua 1 9]

Cro Magnons have ever been portrayed with exaggerated ape features in a scientific setting

The question is could they pass the subway test. If you were to see a Cro Magnon on a NY subway could he pass for a native New Yorker? Or would people think that he was a foreigner?

 

[joshua 1 9]

According to history, it was some 11k years ago, in man's time. The first Human farming began on our planet in the valleys SW of Lake Van, Turkey, also called the Fertile Crescent. Noah was the first Human farmer on planet Earth.

New data obtained during excavations on Van Castle has revealed that Lake Van was much smaller 7,000 years ago and has risen over time to reach its current size. New research overturns theories about Lake Van

 

[Aman777]

Where is God’s word on Pauli’s exclusion principle?

God made Adam with the ability to understand complex things. Gen 3:22 Pauli inherited Adam's ability to know both good and evil...which means that Pauli descended from the first Human. Otherwise, he would NEVER have the increased knowledge to understand his exclusion principle.