-(iconoclast)-
I live by faith in the Son of God
None of which has anything to do with Nestorianism, the Council of Ephesus or the term theotokos.
Hello.
So am i to ignore the words of Jesus?
Upvote
0
None of which has anything to do with Nestorianism, the Council of Ephesus or the term theotokos.
Hello.
So am i to ignore the words of Jesus?
I am not ignoring the words of our Lord in refusing to apply them out of context and in a manner contradictory to other parts of the Gospel text, for example, John 1:1-14.
That's what this discussion is ultimately about. If we read John 1 literally, Jesus is God incarnate and St. Mary gave birth to Him as such, full stop.
Hello thank you for your kind response.
Calling mary the earthly moyher of Jesus does not in any way denote Jesus.
Being born to a virgin is quite a miracle.
I believe we have to watch out how we say things because mary is not the mother of god.
That would be similar to making her a goddess.
Mat 12:47-49But my point is that this was all hashed out in detail before.
With all due respect, it doesn't make Mary a goddess in any sense, or it shouldn't. But Christ is the Divine Logos. And the Divine Logos was carried as in infant in the womb of Mary. She carried Him - God Himself, become Incarnate - within her body, and became mother to Him.
She is the bearer of God. If she is anything less, the infant Jesus wasn't God.
In all fairness you are not asking a question. Mary did not bear God the Father. Such an absurd and preposterous suggestion is simply being troublesome. If you revisit the Council of Ephesus and the discussion that was invoked during the Nestorian controversy, you will see that the Greek term employed was theotikos (God bearer) which was rendered in Latin Mater Dei (Mother of God) which has been consistently defended as a term accepted in the Church as it underlines the Divinity of Jesus. My personal preference is for the term theotikos though I am not uncomfortable with the term Mother of God as I understand that it has history and historic meaning which is both valid and true.Mat 12:47-49
Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.”
48 He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49 Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers
Jesus is God the Son. Did mary bear God the Father?
You know, for every feast day associated with Mary, that is the reading in our Church.Mat 12:47-49
Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.”
48 He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49 Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers
Jesus is God the Son. Did mary bear God the Father?
The 'a virgin' had a name, and that name is Mary, and to my mind most significantly Mary could have said NO to God, and then where would we be? Mary's YES made a big difference to everyone who believes, you and me included.Christ is the God the Son. Our God is a trinity yes.
There is no scripture to back up mary being the mother of God.
Just the earthly mother of Jesus.
Mary is no different to anybody else who believes in Jesus, who was born to a virgin, lived, was crucified, was ressurrected and now sits on the right hand of God.
No, but it would be a fair question for a Christian unclear about or not holding to the Trinity Doctrine. I do not think anyone using the title would confuse the two Persons or that we could speak of them as Individuals really "present" along with the Spirit, are One God. Note the distinct Presence of all Three at His Baptism, still One God.Mat 12:47-49
Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.”
48 He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49 Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers
Jesus is God the Son. Did mary bear God the Father?
But she is very much different and even the angel of God acknowledges this BEFORE the Virgin gives Jesus a "yes". She is also different because of Who He is, no other woman has carried God in Her Womb. And suggesting just another woman, which I actually heard a Baptist minister preach on, is certainly not what the Bible says about Saint Mary. It does not say all generations will call Her ordinary or common.Christ is the God the Son. Our God is a trinity yes.
There is no scripture to back up mary being the mother of God.
Just the earthly mother of Jesus.
Mary is no different to anybody else who believes in Jesus, who was born to a virgin, lived, was crucified, was ressurrected and now sits on the right hand of God.
I guess I still can't understand why people get upset and disagree on that point.
Does Jesus still have flesh?
Im not rejected mary bearing jesus who is God the Son.
Jesus had an earthly form. Mary was His earthly mother.
Im done. If you want to believe mary is the mother of god. Then that is between you and God.
Mary is the earthly mother of jesus, when he was in the earthly form.
But she is very much different and even the angel of God acknowledges this BEFORE the Virgin gives Jesus a "yes". She is also different because of Who He is, no other woman has carried God in Her Womb. And suggesting just another woman, which I actually heard a Baptist minister preach on, is certainly not what the Bible says about Saint Mary. It does not say all generations will call Her ordinary or common.
There is no scripture to back up mary being the mother of God.