The Rapture is not Biblical, False Doctrine? But accepted?

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Jesus himself said, two would be doing (this or that) and one would taken away, and the other left behind

Lets look to the Bible for examples of those taken and those left behind.
Noah left behind
Antediluvian taken in death

Lot and his daughters left behind
Sodom an Gomorrah taken in death

But now the common belief is upside down compared to the Biblical teaching, those taken go to heaven those left behind die. Wonder who is behind this false teaching.

If it is okay with you all I prefer to be left behind instead of Taken in death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ADisciple
Upvote 0
Sep 9, 2016
8
5
52
South Africa
✟8,392.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
1 Thess. 4: It simply refers to the church being 'caught up' to be with the Lord in the air.

Matthew 24 seems to refer to tumultuous events on earth after which the Lord comes to the earth in power and glory.
If you take it literally, it refers to what happens to the remnant of true believers, when Christ returns.

The rapture theology works a bit different. Kind of like:"The church will be beamed up BEFORE the Antichrist starts its trouble on Earth". And that's false as far as I can read it from the bible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ADisciple
Upvote 0

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
If the tribulations happen in my lifetime, then I hope God will let us stay. Think of how many people we could possibly help lead towards salvation, with so much proof staring them in the face. It seems like it would or could be a time when those who are able to speak up and speak out could possibly help others. Feels like it would be a more meaningful bodily/mortal death, down to the wire for as many souls as possible.

Sorry once the tribulation starts all decisions have been made either for Christ or against Christ.

Daniel
12 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JacksBratt
Upvote 0
Sep 9, 2016
8
5
52
South Africa
✟8,392.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
There are three types of saints:

Old Testament saints
New Testament saints
Tribulation saints

The New Testament saints will be raptured before the Tribulation starts.

The verses that pertain to going through the Tribulation apply to the Tribulation saints, not the New Testament saints.

That's an arbitrary distinction of 'Saints' and I would object especially against the distinction between NT and Tribulation saints.

Second mistake is the BEAMING up BEFORE tribulation. That's NOT what the NT tells us:.

22 For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.
23 But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things.
24 But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,
25 And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.
26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.

Bible Gateway passage: Mark 13 - King James Version

Christians will have to face the Tribulation. In fact, the whole tribulation is actually a crushing down on Christians (and probably Nationalists of all kind that don't want to be part of a Globalist Regime).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ewq1938
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
My friend, what you posted is not "hard proof". It is rather taking quotes out-of-context of Church theological history. Though it is true that some of the Church Fathers were premillennialists, including Irenaeus and Justin Martyr, they were not dispensationalists (which is the theory behind the rapture idea today, and which began with people like Darby). Irenaeus and Martyr viewed the Catholic Church as the New Israel. Perhaps most importantly, they did not understand the Church to be an invisible, spiritual entity that would be taken secretly from the earth before the final events of the world, which is the dispensational rapture theory. The idea of this kind of Rapture would have been completely foreign to them.

In addition, premillennialism was never a universal teaching of the Catholic Church, and by the fifth century it was no longer held by any of the Fathers.

Also, opinions of individual Church Fathers did not and does not necessarily constitute the official teaching of the Church at the time, nor now.
You are entirely correct in saying that the church ceased to teach premillennsm, although you are quite incorrect in saying that “by the fifth century it was no longer held by any of the Fathers.”

But you are misrepresenting church history in saying that “some of the Church Fathers were premillennialists.” The hard fact is that there is absolutely no Christian writer previous to Origen who denied a literal millennium, and whose works have been preserved. And you need to remember that Origen was originally condemned as an heretic.

So the hard fact is that every Christian writer who commented on the subject during the first two centuries of the church clearly taught premillennism. This included Papias (c.110-140) , Justyn Martyr (c. 150-160), Irenaeus (c.186-188), Tertullian (c. 207-208), and Hyppolytus (c.202-211). And after the church’s first two centuries, we find Commodianus (c. 240), Nepos (c. 250-260), Victorinus (c.270), Lactantius (c. 304-311), and Apollinaris (c.310-390).

Other early premillennists whose works I have not personally found, but have been referenced by others include Aviricius Marcellus (c.163), Methodius (died c. 311), and Gaudentius (c. 387-410).

(Note: I do not consider myself an expert on dates. All the dates I have given are approximate, and are strictly the opinions of others.)

Additionally, I most certainly did not say that any ancient Christian writer was a dispensationalist. But, although I did not say it in this thread, these early writers actually taught what would today be considered a strange mixture of Dispensationalism and Covenant Theology, their works containing most of the essential elements of both systems of doctrine.

But you are entirely incorrect that Irenaeus did not teach a rapture before the great tribulation. I did not go into it in this thread, but I have published detailed analyses of the entire end time scenario he constructed. And there can be zero doubt that:

1. Irenaeus saw only a 3-1/2 year tribulation, which he saw as the last half of Daniel’s seventieth week.

2. Irenaeus clearly taught that the church would be “suddenly caught up” before this “great tribulation.”

3. Irenaeus taught that this event would take place after the Antichrist came to power, and after he had “put the church to flight,” but that it would take place before the Antichrist began to destroy the world. And he called this period in which the Antichrist would destoy the world the “great tribuation.”

4. At the point in his scenario where Irenaeus said that the church would be “suddenly caught up,” he distinctly changed the nouns and pronouns he used in regard to those passing through these times. Up to that point he always used words such as “the church,” “we,” or “us.” But after this point in his scenario, he used only terms like “the righteous,” “they,” “them,” and “those.” This distinct change ih his use of nouns and pronouns proves that he really meant what he appeared to have been saying, when he spoke of the wickedness of the world in general terms, and then said, "And therefore, when in the end the Church shall be suddenly caught up from this, it is said, 'There shall be tribulation such as has not been since the beginning, neither shall be.'For this is the last contest of the righteous, in which, when they overcome they are crowned with incorruption.'"
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
i don't really give a rats bottom what 'some commentary says " -the word of god is quite plain and clear on it . not sure why some people think a commentary is some how authoritative .

I agree with you completely, that the only thing that counts is what the Bible itself actually says.

But in this discussion, as happens in all such discussions, certain people seek to disparage the doctrine of a rapture before the great tribulation by falsely claiming that this is a relatively new doctrine, having never been taught before the early 1800s.

In this context, and only in this context, it becomes signficant to conclusively prove that this claim is simply and totally incorrect.
 
Upvote 0

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
1. Irenaeus saw only a 3-1/2 year tribulation, which he saw as the last half of Daniel’s seventieth week.

2. Irenaeus clearly taught that the church would be “suddenly caught up” before this “great tribulation.”

3. Irenaeus taught that this event would take place after the Antichrist came to power, and after he had “put the church to flight,” but that it would take place before the Antichrist began to destroy the world. And he called this period in which the Antichrist would destoy the world the “great tribuation.”

Are you saying that Irenaeus taught the GAP theory of the 70 week prophecy of Daniel?

This statement is Hearsay "And he called this period in which the Antichrist would destoy the world the “great tribuation.”

It is clear in the Bible that The LORD will destroy this earth, not the antichrist, and return it back to the way it was prior to the Creation week at his second coming.
2 Peter 3:10
But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
 
Upvote 0

ADisciple

Always Learning
Site Supporter
Sep 7, 2013
28
22
North Carolina
✟67,019.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You might not know this, or have been told this, but you seem to have a gift for understanding which few have. (As my wife would say, "You go girl.") Anyway, I reiterate what I have said before, your need to read Rosenthal's, The Prewrath Rapture of the Church. You go girl!

Thanks so much =) I have the book on my Amazon wish list. Might have to wait a month or two, too many bills coming up at the moment and have taken too many days off sick, so funds are a tad low at the moment.
 
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,282
6,485
62
✟570,686.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Better yet read about it, God's people went through the plagues of Egypt. The last seven had no effect on them.
There are seven last plagues in Revelation that will have no effect on God's People. Because they have the seal of God in their forehead.
When do we get this seal of God on our forehead?
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Are you saying that Irenaeus taught the GAP theory of the 70 week prophecy of Daniel?

This statement is Hearsay "And he called this period in which the Antichrist would destoy the world the “great tribuation.”

It is clear in the Bible that The LORD will destroy this earth, not the antichrist, and return it back to the way it was prior to the Creation week at his second coming.
2 Peter 3:10
But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

Justyn Martyr, Irenaeus, and Hyppolytus all clearly taught that the last of Daniel's seventy weeks remained to be fulfilled in the future.

And a report made by someone who has made a detailed study of what someone else taught is not hearsay.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
When do we get this seal of God on our forehead?
Revelation 7 King James Version (KJV)
7 And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.

2 And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,

3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.

4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.

5 Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand.

6 Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nephthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand.

7 Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand.

8 Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

9 After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands;

10 And cried with a loud voice, saying, Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb.

11 And all the angels stood round about the throne, and about the elders and the four beasts, and fell before the throne on their faces, and worshipped God,

12 Saying, Amen: Blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever. Amen.

13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they?

14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
 
Upvote 0

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Justyn Martyr, Irenaeus, and Hyppolytus all clearly taught that the last of Daniel's seventy weeks remained to be fulfilled in the future.

And a report made by someone who has made a detailed study of what someone else taught is not hearsay.

My error it should read heresy not hearsay.
 
Upvote 0

JellyQuest

Active Member
Dec 14, 2016
108
44
58
nz
✟18,366.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I agree with you completely, that the only thing that counts is what the Bible itself actually says.

But in this discussion, as happens in all such discussions, certain people seek to disparage the doctrine of a rapture before the great tribulation by falsely claiming that this is a relatively new doctrine, having never been taught before the early 1800s.

In this context, and only in this context, it becomes signficant to conclusively prove that this claim is simply and totally incorrect.
Or they do the opposite.
The question remains one of motive.
Those who desire a pretrib rapture dont seem to want to lay thier lives down for Jesus ,now or anytime.
 
Upvote 0

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Justyn Martyr, Irenaeus, and Hyppolytus all clearly taught that the last of Daniel's seventy weeks remained to be fulfilled in the future.

Thanks for the information I did not know this. Now these statement of Jesus have more meaning.
Matthew 24:11
And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
Matthew 24:24
For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

marineimaging

Texas Baptist now living in Colorado
Jul 14, 2014
1,449
1,228
Ward, Colorado
Visit site
✟90,207.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What I find interesting is those with scholarly factoids discussing this 1st century priest or that 17th century theologian. I didn't develop any notion of the Rapture of the church from any of those writings. I never read them as best I can recall. I developed an idea of the Rapture, as we understand it, from reading the King James Version of the Bible. This notion was nurtured by discussions and sermons by our pastor, but not written in stone by them. While I was influenced in more depth by my continued discussions, not once did those pastors or students influence me to embrace the Rapture as an event I could look forward to. That was between me and the Word of God.
 
Upvote 0

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I see no one has attempted to dispute what is posted in post 140:

The Rapture is not Biblical, False Doctrine? But accepted?

Only dispute I have is
2. the resurrection. (dead saints resurrect bodily in heaven and follow Christ as he returns to the Earth-second coming) (1Th 4:14-16)

As it does not fit with verse 16
16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

This says that the dead in Christ are risen after the decent from heaven as it is his voice that calls them from the grave. Story of Lazarus is our example of the resurrection where the dead are called forth with his voice.


2 Thessalonians 1:6-8 King James Version (KJV)
6 Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you;
7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, (we are not angels)
8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:

I cannot find any mention of the resurrected coming with the Lord at the second coming. I do find it after the millennium when New Jerusalem is brought to this earth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JacksBratt
Upvote 0

DingDing

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2016
858
272
65
Florida
✟29,332.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Thanks so much =) I have the book on my Amazon wish list. Might have to wait a month or two, too many bills coming up at the moment and have taken too many days off sick, so funds are a tad low at the moment.

I understand what that is like. I pray for you to get past this cold soon.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: ADisciple
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Original Happy Camper

One of GODS Children I am a historicist
Site Supporter
Mar 19, 2016
4,195
1,970
Alabama
✟486,806.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You mean there is a difference?! :idea:

My brother took it that I was criticizing him when I was saying that those that wrote that the last week of Daniel's 70 week prophecy were committing heresy. The reason that it is heresy is that the last week is about Christ's ministry, death at the cross and the gospel going to the gentiles, not about the antichrist. Futurism is a RCC teaching generated by Francisco Ribera a Jesuit priest during the counter reformation.
 
Upvote 0