Denied on basis of being a CredoBaptist

heymikey80 said:

'Guess there wasn't any way to answer this assertion.

What's the evidence Christ's church ever prohibited baptism of infants in its first four hundred years?

Click to expand...

His answer is that because they also practiced baptismal regeneration and other abominations, infant baptism by sprinkling or pouring, which they also practiced, must be wrong.

Is everything they believed subject to revision then as well? The Trinity, perhaps?

The test for whether what ANY church believes is right or wrong is the Bible. If the ancient church practiced it and it's historically, linguistically and theologically biblical, it's good and biblical doctrine. Both the Trinity and Infant Baptism by affusion are examples of this. Baptismal regeneration is not.

Anoetos said:

But why? Because you're out of historical revisions and blank denials?

Click to expand...

No, because i prefer to keep an amicable relationship with everyone in this Room. Unsubscribing or not replying means that this is as far as i'm willing to take it. I wont change your mind and i doubt you would change mine.