A
Airman424
Guest
Does everyone here feel that Ellen White is a prophet? Does anyone struggle with that? Does belief in Ellen White's prophethood make or break one's Seventh Day Adventist faith?
I think ECR is correct. The denomination views it as fundamental that members believe that the writings of Ellen G. White be seen as a continuing and authoritative source of truth.I don't see how you could be an Adventist and not recognize the importance of the message God gave through sister White.
We don't know how close the time of troubles is but we know it's close, and we will need to be standing on solid ground.
I agree wholeheartedly. My journey of testing started with me desiring to prove to my brother-in-law that SDAism is correct. Open-minded exploration sometimes takes you in directions you did not anticipate, but a Spirit-led journey is life changing.I do thinks all Adventists, check that all Christians', should go through the process of testing what they profess to believe.
Well said.If you have a doubt in the shadows you need to get in there with a flashlight and clean out the cobwebs.
You and I would probably agree that -- hopefully -- the solid ground on which we're standing is Jesus Christ (and not our own fallible understanding of doctrine).We don't know how close the time of troubles is but we know it's close, and we will need to be standing on solid ground.
There certainly is enough hatred to go around whenever this topic is discussed and -- sadly -- there are "hate sites" on both sides of the table.then I went through all the hate sites
I agree wholeheartedly. My journey of testing started with me desiring to prove to my brother-in-law that SDAism is correct. Open-minded exploration sometimes takes you in directions you did not anticipate, but a Spirit-led journey is life changing.
Well said.
You and I would probably agree that -- hopefully -- the solid ground on which we're standing is Jesus Christ (and not our own fallible understanding of doctrine).
There certainly is enough hatred to go around whenever this topic is discussed and -- sadly -- there are "hate sites" on both sides of the table.
BFA
Ok, so ANY denomination should be able to stand on God's Word alone. I believe it was EGW herself, that said if we read our Bibles as we should, her writings would not be necessary. I believe her to have had a special annointing and a gift of prophecy. I don't believe her to be THE Gift of Prophecy, becuase that is not biblical.
If you take EGW out of SDA, what do you have left?
Actually, sister White was only one of many early pioneers that formulated the Adventist doctrine.... yes she expounded upon it and was shown greater insight into the Biblical narrative but was not soley responsible for it.
Right ECR.
SOTK, when you take EGW away, what you have left is the living Word of God, right? What else should anyone need? The messenger is in no way responsible for the message, they just deliver it. We focus way to much on the messenger, believing that messnger to be as great as the message or even the Orginator of the message.
We get different denoms/beliefs, because everyone focusses on certain aspects of the Bible, and then build their doctrine around them.
When we qare indivudals read the Bible, even with the guiding of the HS, our own comprehension and life experiences play a hug part in how er interpret what we are reading, there is no way around it. But I believe this is one way God relates to us as individuals. That is what makes the Bible so wonderful, a living Word, in that it alone can minister to anyone where right where they are. it is just full of stories of God doing exactly that.
now, one thing that might get in the way some of the time is the participation in Organized denoms. they tend to operate from a position that they have already interpreted everything for you and you will come to same conclusions if you we what and how we tell you. So it does set up conflicts when one earnestly serches an does not come to different conclusions. Organized religion doesn't take that to well. Depending on the position of the member questioning words like disfellowship and apostasy come into play. They are definteily not big on "new light".
In my experience there are many churches that are not even close to being as dogmatic as Adventists are about specific doctrine. The church I go to doesn't seem to really care if you believe that upon death we go to heaven looking down, or are in a state of "being with God" until the reserrection. It doesn't seem to matter if you think creation was in seven literal days, or in an undefined period of time in which God was in control. It doesn't seem to matter if you belive the Sabbath is now celebrated on Sunday,or you believe the Sabbath is a thing ended at the cross. I could go on......
It doesn't mean we don't have core beliefs, it just means we agree on the basics that God loves us enough to send His Son to die on the cross for our sins and we are saved by grace through faith in Him. As such we live lives trying to show the world this love. I would hope Adventism could be this way, too.
This is my experience as well.In my experience there are many churches that are not even close to being as dogmatic as Adventists are about specific doctrine. The church I go to doesn't seem to really care if you believe that upon death we go to heaven looking down, or are in a state of "being with God" until the reserrection. It doesn't seem to matter if you think creation was in seven literal days, or in an undefined period of time in which God was in control. It doesn't seem to matter if you belive the Sabbath is now celebrated on Sunday,or you believe the Sabbath is a thing ended at the cross. I could go on.......
Although theological bullying can be found in any group, some groups are more suseptible than others. These groups prefer the "my way or the highway" approach.
BFA
ECR,Yeah, kind of the way that God is specific in how we worship Him... what a bully.
ECR,Joe, can you please offer some expaination of what you were trying to say in this post? Thanx...
On two of the issues you cited, the state of the dead and time of creation, are to me, fundamental to understand so as to not be deceived.
With the state of the dead, if you understand and believe the majority of Bible text that say death is a sleep and that the dead know not anything, then we cannot be deceived with Satans attack through spiritualism. Believing in dead spirits or messages from loved ones can be used by the deceiver to draw us away from God and what He teaches.
With the creation timeline, the worlds understanding is that evolution is the only way the universe coud have come into existance and sadly alot of the church now believes, at least in part, this line of reasoning. This puts man (science) up against God and just because our finite minds cannot conceive of a lteral 6 day creation we err on the side of 'logic'. I don't know about you but the God I serve can do anything and if He said He spoke the universe into existance in 6 days, then how arrogant would it be for me to say othewise.
Not only this, but faith in science is what causes people to believe without question the wisdom of man eg: that it's global warming that's causing the increase in natural disasters when we know these are signs that Jesus spoke of almost 2000 years ago. Wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that Satan would try and divert our minds from prophesy and focus it on man's ideas?