Originally posted by TheBear
The outcome, within the framework of a Chiristian Forum, does not suprise me. Put the same poll in the general public arena, and the results may be different. Put this same poll in the international scientific community, and you will see a drastic difference.
John
Originally posted by Shane Roach
Perhaps this would be a good time for you to explain again how it is that evolution does not in any way conflict with faith in God and Christ?
Originally posted by Shane Roach
Ok. Do you understand where the conflict even comes from? Can you imagine a reason why someone might believe in a 6 day creation other than that they have a firm belief in not using their brain, as you seem to have put it?
Originally posted by ANITA
evolution is a replacemnet for God.
Originally posted by ANITA
I THINK EVOLUTION IS BLINDLY ACCEPTED IN SO MANY CASES. LIKE THE IDEA THAT DINOS TURNED TO BIRDS. NOW IM SORRY BUT THAT IS THE SILLIEST THING IVE EVER HEARD. THAT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. DIFFERENT HEART CHAMBERS TO SDTART WITH. TO THINK THAT ONE DAY A REPTILE LAID AN EGG AND OUT POPPED A BIRD IS JUST WELL, IT WOULD SURE TAKE SOME FAITH TO BELIEVE THAT. BY THE WAY, THAT IDEA IS IN EVERY PUBLIC SCHOOL SCIENCE TEXT IN AMERICA. WHY DOES THE (F.A.R.M.) THEORY SO READILY ACCEPTED? I THINK GOD CREATED ALL THE BIRDS AND FISH ON DAY 5 OF CREATION AND ALL THE MAMMALS AND MAN ON DAY 6.
Originally posted by newworldcrusader
Kent Hovine is the best debater I have seen or heard.
Originally posted by brt28006
Click here to read a Kent Hovind speech scrutinized by a real scientist
Originally posted by brt28006
Maybe so, but all the flare in the world doesn't make a person correct.
Click here to read a Kent Hovind speech scrutinized by a real scientist
Originally posted by unworthyone
I guess you see the quote mining but the scrutiny did not have his own opposing views. He just said Hovind was wrong but without explanation of his own.