DOJ Quietly Deletes Study After Charlie Kirk's Death That Says Right-Wing Extremists Engage in 'Far More' Political Violence

[Say it aint so]

The U.S. Department of Justice appears to have quietly removed information online regarding right-wing violence following the assassination of Charlie Kirk.​

​

As of Friday, Sept. 12, a 2024 study titled “What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism” no longer appears on the DOJ website under President Donald Trump's administration. However, it is still viewable as an archived post on Wayback Machine. “Militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States. In fact, the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism,” the first two lines of the study read. The study went on to say, “Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives.”--HERE​

​

No matter how much gaslighting the Trump admin and the right may invoke, that is the reality.
I mean exactly how many liberal radicals militias are out there in the woods playing army in preparation of a revolution?
But kind of like climate change and science itself, anything the Trump admin doesn't like gets deleted from government websites.
They are literally whitewashing reality.

 

[iluvatar5150]

I mean exactly how many liberal radicals militias are out there in the woods playing army in preparation of a revolution?​

Seriously. The only reason our side was finally able to get a shooter with decent aim is because he flipped after growing up conservative.

 

[Larniavc]

People are saying

This phase has, since the beginning of language been a cypher for ‘what I believe’.

 

[Say it aint so]

This phase has, since the beginning of language been a cypher for ‘what I believe’.

I think it was coined by FOXnews.

 

[DaisyDay]

I think it was coined by FOXnews.

I thought it was Trump.

 

[Servus]

I mean exactly how many liberal radicals militias are out there in the woods playing army in preparation of a revolution?

If only Antifa didn't exist.

The 'redneck' vegan arming himself against white supremacists

Donald Trump's inauguration as US president a year ago reinvigorated many right-wing groups, including white supremacists. Now the militant left is fighting back with some shock tactics of its own.

www.abc.net.au

 

[JosephZ]

If only Antifa didn't exist.

Or Aryan Nations, QAnon, Proud Boys, Boogaloo Movement, Three Percenters, or Oath Keepers to name a few.

 

[Servus]

Or Aryan Nations, QAnon, Proud Boys, Boogaloo Movement, Three Percenters, or Oath Keepers to name a few.

But the idea is supposed to be that there's no left-wing version of that.

 

[Servus]

Seriously. The only reason our side was finally able to get a shooter with decent aim is because he flipped after growing up conservative.

So now it's finally being confirmed that Tyler Robinson is a member of the left-wing.

That's a really good quote - it should go viral.

 

[iluvatar5150]

So now it's finally being confirmed that Tyler Robinson is a member of the left-wing.

That's a really good quote - it should go viral.

I mean… I was making a joke, but I’ve already conceded elsewhere that it looks like he was not a right-winger. I also never argued strenuously that he was, merely that the crowd shouting that he was a leftist didn’t have enough information to support that claim.

 

[Say it aint so]

If only Antifa didn't exist.

View attachment 370196

The 'redneck' vegan arming himself against white supremacists

Donald Trump's inauguration as US president a year ago reinvigorated many right-wing groups, including white supremacists. Now the militant left is fighting back with some shock tactics of its own.

www.abc.net.au

Well what do you know. There is one.....kind of.
Any comment to deleting all the government reports regarding right wing domestic terrorism?

 

[Servus]

Well what do you know. There is one.....kind of.

More than one. Digging uncovers interesting information about liberal and left-wing militant groups.

 

[Say it aint so]

Digging uncovers interesting information about liberal and left-wing militant groups.

Any comment to deleting all the government reports regarding right wing domestic terrorism?

 

[Servus]

Any comment to deleting all the government reports regarding right wing domestic terrorism?

One becomes all?

Search | National Institute of Justice

nij.ojp.gov

NIJ Journal Issue 285: Domestic Radicalization, Violent Extremism, and Terrorism

The NIJ Journal features articles to help criminal justice policymakers and practitioners stay informed about new developments. The NIJ Journal presents research-based information that can help inform policy decisions and improve understanding of the criminal justice system.In this issue, our...

nij.ojp.gov

 

[Say it aint so]

"Download full issue" of "NIJ Journal Issue 285: Domestic Radicalization, Violent Extremism, and Terrorism"
gives one:

They are at least consistent. Again, a comment on removals?

 

[Servus]

"Download full issue" of "NIJ Journal Issue 285: Domestic Radicalization, Violent Extremism, and Terrorism"
gives one:

View attachment 370206

They are at least consistent. Again, a comment on removals?

It's their content and they can take it down if they want to.

Do you normally read NIJ journals? Or was the People magazine article the first you ever heard of them?

 

[Say it aint so]

It's their content and they can take it down if they want to.

Do you normally read NIJ journals? Or was the People magazine article the first you ever heard of them?

No, that belongs to the citizens of the US.
The People magazine sources the now deleted site.
So that is the source to read, or apparently look at the "The requested page could not be found."
And I notice you still haven't answer my question.
Or is your, "it's their content they can take down if they want to" your response.
I mean are you ok with them deleting justice reports, health reports, climate reports because it doesn't suit their alternative reality?

 

[Say it aint so]

And just today under the same topic.

A Trump Administration Playbook: No Data, No Problem​

A pattern of getting rid of statistics has emerged that echoes the president’s first term, when he suggested if the nation stopped testing for Covid, it would have few cases.

​

"When the Trump administration said last week that it would stop requiring thousands of industrial facilities to report their planet-warming pollution, the move fit a growing pattern: If data points to a problem, stop collecting the data.​

At the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, experts are no longer tracking the most expensive extreme weather events, those that cause at least $1 billion in damage.​

At NASA, Trump officials want to decommission two powerful satellites that provide precise measurements of the greenhouse gases that are driving climate change.​

And at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, layoffs have gutted a division that maintains statistics on car crashes, gun violence and homicides, among other things....​

...The impulse to get rid of facts and figures that the president dislikes has reached new heights in Mr. Trump’s second term, where it has extended to the officials who oversee that information. In August, for instance, the president fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, saying without evidence that weak jobs numbers had been “rigged” and “phony.”...​

...At the E.P.A., Trump officials said on Friday that they would end the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, the country’s most comprehensive way to track the heat-trapping greenhouse gases that are dangerously warming the planet. Lee Zeldin, the E.P.A. administrator, said in a statement that the program was “nothing more than bureaucratic red tape.”​

For the past 15 years, the program has collected data from roughly 8,000 industrial facilities nationwide, including coal-burning power plants, oil refineries and steel mills. The publication of this data has resulted in many companies reducing their emissions, most likely because the firms tried to become greener than their competitors, according to 2023 research by Sorabh Tomar, an assistant professor of accounting at Southern Methodist University.​

​

The OP is in regard to a justice system report. And thanks to forum member Servus, another report was found deleted.
One would think this would alarm everyone.

 

[Servus]

No, that belongs to the citizens of the US.
The People magazine sources the now deleted site.
So that is the source to read, or apparently look at the "The requested page could not be found."
And I notice you still haven't answer my question.
Or is your, "it's their content they can take down if they want to" your response.

Bingo. It's their website and they can delete whatever they want to on it. Was I supposed to come up with a conspiracy theory?

I mean are you ok with them deleting justice reports, health reports, climate reports because it doesn't suit their alternative reality?

I don't care because I don't read those things and neither do you.

 

[Say it aint so]

Bingo. It's their website and they can delete whatever they want to on it. Was I supposed to come up with a conspiracy theory?

I don't care because I don't read those things and neither do you.

There is no conspiracy theory to this. They just purge and delete facts, science, and basically reality when it doesn't suit them.
See post 18. It's "well we won't have a covid problem if we just stop testing."
And yes, I do read government websites.
They are a source of education, but when that org loves the poorly educated, the poorly educated are indifferent about data.