Your claim is that if someone might misuse something, the news should not talk about it?The purpose does not matter. It is how certain people choose to use it.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your claim is that if someone might misuse something, the news should not talk about it?The purpose does not matter. It is how certain people choose to use it.
Does this mean you'd support a nationwide moratorium on the advertising of guns/weapons, gun shows and such?When you know people will use it for that purpose, you should not promote it.
This has no correlation.Does this mean you'd support a nationwide moratorium on the advertising of guns/weapons, gun shows and such?
See no correlation. This is about making someone a "TARGET".We know for a fact people misuse them for violent purposes routinely.
It is your inconsistency. Victims vs persecutors. And provide for the targeting of a persecutor.If you are to be consistent, then there should be no promotion for those, right?
When you know people will use it for that purpose, you should not promote it.
Don't look now but your paper thin ad hoc rationalization appears to be exposed.This has no correlation.
See no correlation. This is about making someone a "TARGET".
It is your inconsistency. Victims vs persecutors. And provide for the targeting of a persecutor.
So your analogies do not apply.
The radical groups, and individuals who target law enforcement, of all stripes exposes your irrational bias in judgement here.Don't look now but your paper thin ad hoc rationalization appears to be exposed.
Do they use guns? I bet they use guns.The radical groups, and individuals who target law enforcement, of all stripes exposes your irrational bias in judgement here.
These groups are "groups" based upon what they say and DO. they have identified themselves. They are the "demonizers". Identify much?Do they use guns? I bet they use guns.
The fact remains, you want to demonize one group and absolve another.
We know law enforcement these days have been killed, set up etc. Made targets (Demonized) as oppressors of whomever these make into victims. they also like to intimidate those who do not agree with them.You can try to dress it up however you like, but no one is going to buy your reasoning.
Cool sorry bro, changed my life.These groups are "groups" based upon what they say and DO. they have identified themselves. They are the "demonizers". Identify much?
Uh huh. Keep trying to point the finger at one side while ignoring the other.We know law enforcement these days have been killed, set up etc. Made targets (Demonized) as oppressors of whomever these make into victims. they also like to intimidate those who do not agree with them.
It actually fits better than the ICE app.This has no correlation.
The app actually let's people that may be the target avoid arrest.See no correlation. This is about making someone a "TARGET".
"Collusion with big tech" to trap (catch criminals),"collusion of anti law enforcement" using tech to trap (ambush) Ice.I gotta say, I’ve been pretty plugged into all this ICE stuff going on around here and this thread was the first time I even heard of this app. Most people I know are following pages on instagram and twitter that are alerting people of the whereabouts of ICE agents every day. None of these pages have been promoting this app or anything like it. Knowing the past collusion between big tech and the government, this “tracker app” comes across much more like a trap for the people using it than anything kind of resource for people directly impacted by these ICE raids.
Do you have a general knowledge of most anti law enforcement groups for what you say to mean much?It’s a bit silly to focus on a single app being “promoted” on CNN when most people I know aren’t relying on this app or CNN for any ICE raid information to begin with.
To entrap the people using the app. It’s seems the most likely reason why it’s suddenly being promoted on mainstream media as well as from the press secretary."Collusion with big tech" to trap (catch criminals),"collusion of anti law enforcement" using tech to trap (ambush) Ice.
All I know is no one around me is relying on CNN or any app they’re promoting for ICE alerts. It makes the whole thing very suspicious.Do you have a general knowledge of most anti law enforcement groups for what you say to mean much?
On now we have another victim. This is just going into which is the victim here.To entrap the people using the app. It’s seems the most likely reason why it’s suddenly being promoted on mainstream media as well as from the press secretary.
Plenty of suspicion on all sides.All I know is no one around me is relying on CNN or any app they’re promoting for ICE alerts. It makes the whole thing very suspicious.
Enough anti-law enforcement groups a plenty.Fortunately there’s enough resources out there that this one app isn’t necessary to avoid ICE raids or to alert others of them. Most groups have been doing fine without this app drawing attention to themselves.
Who is more likely to be victimized, ICE or the people they are targeting?On now we have another victim.
I would hope people around me would alert the neighbors when there’s armed, masked men grabbing random people off the street. That’s precisely what a community watch is supposed to be looking out for.