That could be a case of what I decades ago characterized as "the moderate critic being moved to the extreme by the over-reaction of the entrenched."Sabine has chosen to use her platform to get rage clicks from anti-science people and has repeatedly encourage their viewership and make her money. Videos that are used by anti-science people to say "angry science lady says scientists are evil/greedy/whatever" (it's already in this thread). In other videos (and I didn't spot it in this one) she goes from "particle physics is a waste to academic science is corrupt and wasteful in the same sentence. After reading the letter she spends the rest of her time (before the ad) libeling groups people and attacking two HEP experiments/facilities (DUNE and EIC), calling them make-work projects pursing made up problems. She's capable of reading the science cases for both and understanding them. The old Sabine would be explaining what could be discovered and what questions will be addressed even if she thought one of the public facing reasons was hype.
She knows how her videos will be used and she doesn't care or worse, she likes it.
I've been listening to her videos for a while now, and there certainly does appear to be a problem she's bringing to the forefront. You can ignore the problem because you don't like her or you can listen to see if there isn't a point to what she's saying.
Upvote
0