• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Democratic Party continues to fall

Status
Not open for further replies.

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,916
9,336
65
✟441,797.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
While we often say "children" we simply mean those who are "innocent" and deserve to keep said innocence.

We aren't upset that a two year old who is completely unaware of self might see a 1 year old get a diaper change.

We don't want our sons and daughters sexualized by government agencies into sexual degeneracy (from the age of 5 to the age of 18) and our daughters left unsafe in society because of it.

Sex is not meaningless and it can be absolutely destructive and life altering when applied in any kind of improper context.

We have a duty to protect our children.

What you are showing here is something called common sense. The fact that you have to explain it is strong evidence that far too many on the left have none when it comes to some things. I have have to shake my head at so many posts that show the complete loss of common sense. Thanks for being that person who shows what common sense is.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Hazelelponi
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,837
21,779
30
Nebraska
✟858,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Because she supposedly "cackles". Got it. Seems like a perfectly reasonable way to judge the policies of political candidates. Better to focus on that and what might have happened if she were elected than talk about the current disaster of an administration. For example, starting what the WSJ called "The Dumbest Trade War in History".
"supposedly" ????

H3_MZBCAcbE
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,088
14,242
Earth
✟254,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
  • Winner
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,837
21,779
30
Nebraska
✟858,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
You would have voted for Hariss except that you didn’t like how she laughs?
No?
Then why mention “how she laughs” at all?
That wasn't my point.

No.

I didn't vote for Harris because I didn't accept or like her policies.

Also, my point about "her laughs" is she is very hard to take seriously as a leader.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,088
14,242
Earth
✟254,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
That wasn't my point.

No.

I didn't vote for Harris because I didn't accept or like her policies.

Also, my point about "her laughs" is she is very hard to take seriously as a leader.
Well, you voted for the person whom you voted for for your own reasons and I shan’t question any of that.

It would seem that you’re still happy with how you voted and we will see if that joy continues for the next two years.

Have an excellent day.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,837
21,779
30
Nebraska
✟858,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Well, you voted for the person whom you voted for for your own reasons and I shan’t question any of that.

It would seem that you’re still happy with how you voted and we will see if that joy continues for the next two years.

Have an excellent day.
Thank you.

You as well.

For the record, I am not saying Trump is perfect, far from it. I just didn't have much choice.
 
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
50,217
18,126
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,072,704.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
“The Democratic brand is in the toilet,” Molly Ball wrote in The Wall Street Journal, noting that a Journal poll found that “60 percent of Americans view the party unfavorably while only 36 percent see it favorably. Democrats lost ground with nearly every demographic.”
Dire warnings about the Republicans, and especially Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) dominate the coverage. The Washington Post, chastised by owner Jeff Bezos for being out of touch with many Americans, was supposed to curb its worst excesses. Not happening.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,916
9,336
65
✟441,797.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Trump has over a 50% approval rating. He has a 49% approval from Hispanics and an unheard of 33% from blacks.

He's doing exactly what he was voted in to do. The Democrats doubled down on the reasons why they lost. They are over if they don't tone it down. And right now, they are not. So say goodbye to any chance of winning in the future.

They need to get back to the center and get some common sense if they hope to get back into power. As long as they remain obstructions and far left, they will continue to lose. As has been proven now, Ameticans whole heartedly support the end of leftist idiology such as, transing children, DEI, CRT, and spending our rax dollars foolishly like on transgender surgeries in Guatemala and Politico and Seseme Street and Gender garbage overseas.

If the Democrats are so concerned about illegals then they would step up and whole heartedly support shutting down the border and coming up with a solid immigration plan. Which rhe American people would support. So should the Republicans by the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟553,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Sometimes...
And sometimes judges agree with them


In this case, lots and lots of them. Over and over. Almost as if there's a pattern that threads like this are designed to distract from.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟553,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Also, my point about "her laughs" is she is very hard to take seriously as a leader.
She laughs -> is unelectable. Is a convicted felon -> vote for the guy. "Interesting" decision matrix, "interesting" enough that it makes posts like these hard to take seriously.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,837
21,779
30
Nebraska
✟858,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
She laughs -> is unelectable. Is a convicted felon -> vote for the guy. "Interesting" decision matrix, "interesting" enough that it makes posts like these hard to take seriously.
I thought personal attacks were against the forum rules now.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,837
21,779
30
Nebraska
✟858,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Could be, not sure what that has to do with assessing the content of a post to determine how seriously to take it.
Beyond her laughing was her terrible policies.

Felons can change, you know?
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,088
14,242
Earth
✟254,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Also, my point about "her laughs" is she is very hard to take seriously as a leader.

She laughs -> is unelectable. Is a convicted felon -> vote for the guy. "Interesting" decision matrix, "interesting" enough that it makes posts like these hard to take seriously.

I thought personal attacks were against the forum rules now.
I didn‘t catch that “personal attack”, can you point it out to me?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,837
21,779
30
Nebraska
✟858,030.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I didn‘t catch that “personal attack”, can you point it out to me?
I didn’t vote for Trump he’s a convicted felon. I voted for him based on his policies.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.