I think some of the stats you present, while useful to assess certain things, don't necessarily account for the factor of "already have money and established a good income and housing" vs. not having those things.
I mentioned this in another thread, but there's a bit of double-speak at play.
People will appeal to a handful of selected stats to claim the economy is "good" to defend a particular team's economic record, meanwhile, they're constantly asking for the types of things that one would only ask for if they thought a significant amount of people were having a rough time under the current economy.
"The economy is doing great!!; you're just scaremongering and misleading people for political gains.......
.... but, quick side note, we desperately need to overhaul the student loan and healthcare systems, increase subsidized housing, and increase the minimum wage by 50%, because we have a lot of people having a hard time keeping their head above water out there"
Well, is it great?, or isn't it?
If you want to really assess what drives opinions about "how the economy is doing" in the abstract rhetorical sense, which is what people use when they vote on "the economy"...that really comes down to a small handful of things, and it's the things that are close to home.
"What kind of buying power do I have in terms of housing?"
"What does my grocery bill look like?"
"How much does it cost to fill up my tank?"
Shallow and incomplete? Sure... but those are the things a majority of Americans are thinking about when they vote based on "the economy". They don't care about the Dow, or GDP to debt ratio comparisons between Q2 and Q4...
"Can I cover my bills, and if so, how much money do I have left afterwards to do fun stuff?"...that's what most people are voting on when they say they're voting on "the economy"