- Apr 5, 2007
- 144,401
- 27,047
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Yes.Even if he doesn't replace a single person he still needs to be able to supervise them in doing their work.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes.Even if he doesn't replace a single person he still needs to be able to supervise them in doing their work.
I’m pretty sure he’s supervised people.And there is no indication he has any experience doing so, or knows enough about the organization to be able to provide guidance on policy.
He won’t need to supervise that many.Thousands of employees?
Well, at least you're honest.Because it annoys the crap out of the Left.
Dr. Oz wants a healthier senior population which could greatly cut the costs. He could, for example, allow seniors free memberships in health clubs. And maybe have some incentives to use those health clubs.What makes you think so? He has no experience running a health insurance system.
But the current head of CMS is Chiquita W. Brooks-LaSure.QFT -
Xavier Becerra has zero background in medicine.
Less as Chiquita W. Brooks-LaSure has worked in public health and Medicaid specifically, so far more actual experience and relevant education than Dr. Oz.He has as much experience as the current head. And he’s a doctor.
But that's not true. The current head of CMS most certainly did have experience in public health as a researcher and lead Medicaid analysis.And I said that the current director had not experience prior to getting the job. I don’t recall hearing complaints from either side.
Yeah, that's an excellent reason to appoint people into positions. Much better than relevant experience and institutional knowledge. Drawback is that he really ought not to hawk any products he has a vested interest in.Because it annoys the crap out of the Left.
Whenever any candidate goes to great lengths to hide information, my immediate reaction is to assume it's very bad--especially when the physical evidence is weightier than reported.
For instance, he has been publicly called out by the FDA for "irresponsible and misleading" claims about levels of arsenic in apple juice. ''
Which isn’t administrative.But that's not true. The current head of CMS most certainly did have experience in public health as a researcher and lead Medicaid analysis.
Okay.Yeah, that's an excellent reason to appoint people into positions. Much better than relevant experience and institutional knowledge. Drawback is that he really ought not to hawk any products he has a vested interest in.
From what I've read so far, no one on team Trump has signed the ethics agreements to even begin to learn about any agencies they may lead.
Chiquita was a Congressional staffer for a number of years. I prefer someone with medical education and training to head Medicare.But the current head of CMS is Chiquita W. Brooks-LaSure.
Less as Chiquita W. Brooks-LaSure has worked in public health and Medicaid specifically, so far more actual experience and relevant education than Dr. Oz.
“Health clubs” are just going to allow people to wander in to use their facilities/equipment for free?Dr. Oz wants a healthier senior population which could greatly cut the costs. He could, for example, allow seniors free memberships in health clubs. And maybe have some incentives to use those health clubs.
President Trump may choose Hulk Hogan, a senior, to head fitness for the nation and together they might implement programs that could delay heart disease and diabetes for the senior population.
No. The government can negotiate a steep discount, particularly since seniors will not be expected to be heavy users of health clubs. It can be a benefit of Medicare. Just like the government can negotiate drug prices for 66 million seniors on Medicare.“Health clubs” are just going to allow people to wander in to use their facilities/equipment for free?
Sure, why not?
I didn’t have socialized-health-clubs on my bingo card, but okay.No. The government can negotiate a steep discount, particularly since seniors will not be expected to be heavy users of health clubs. It can be a benefit of Medicare. Just like the government can negotiate drug prices for 66 million seniors on Medicare.
Dr. Oz wants a healthier senior population which could greatly cut the costs. He could, for example, allow seniors free memberships in health clubs. And maybe have some incentives to use those health clubs.
President Trump may choose Hulk Hogan, a senior, to head fitness for the nation and together they might implement programs that could delay heart disease and diabetes for the senior population.