Women are using the 6-6-6 dating rule to find the perfect man — but is it hurting their chance at finding love?

[Michie]

People are just discovering what dating profiles with 6-6-6 mean. No, it’s not satanic — but it could lead you to a devilishly eligible bachelor.

The 6-6-6 rule refers to men who are 6 feet tall, have six-pack abs and make over six figures.

Some women claim to use the rule to find men who fit the bill and help narrow down the seemingly never-ending lineup of potential matches on dating apps.

Continued below.

Women are using the 6-6-6 dating rule to find the perfect man — but is it hurting their chance at finding love?

Some women claim to use the rule to find men who fit the bill and help narrow down the seemingly never ending lineup of potential matches on dating apps.

nypost.com

 

[pgp_protector]

Ah well I only match 2 of those 3 Guess I'm out of luck. But than again I'm not looking as I'm working or year 32.

 

[Michie]

I just roll my eyes at that vapid nonsense.

 

[JustaPewFiller]

So I guess it doesn't matter if the potential date is a horrible person as long as he is a tall, in shape and financially well off horrible person?

It seems very silly and shallow.

Not to pick on the ladies at all. I know several men who have equally shallow and silly requirements.

 

[Michie]

So I guess it doesn't matter if the potential date is a horrible person as long as he is a tall, in shape and financially well off horrible person?

It seems very silly and shallow.

Not to pick on the ladies at all. I know several men who have equally shallow and silly requirements.

Vapid has no gender boundaries.

 

[Ignatius the Kiwi]

Female hypergamy is real and has been accelerated in modern times. Especially Inn the USA.

 

[Richard T]

Female hypergamy is real and has been accelerated in modern times. Especially Inn the USA.

Asian and African woman are very aware of the concept of marrying up. Fortunately, for American men even a man near poverty can qualify.

 

[NBB]

Supposedly.
The 'Chads' sleep with them and then dump them, the women don't understand this 'Chads' are passing a good time, and they have high standards for which person to marry, so they say women aim at the 15% of the top men, but those 'winners' play with them.
The good guys who doesn't have much money etc, could be faithful to her but women don't want them.

 

[bèlla]

Supposedly.
The 'Chads' sleep with them and then dump them, the women don't understand this 'Chads' are passing a good time, and they have high standards for which person to marry, so they say women aim at the 15% of the top men, but those 'winners' play with them.
The good guys who doesn't have much money etc, could be faithful to her but women don't want them.

This is what happens when you listen to red pill sources instead of real people. No woman refers to men as Chad's or the related nonsense that comes from that community. Using the lingo is more of a hindrance than not and it carries a stigma. Most associate it with misogyny and incels.

The belief that women are in the dark about high wage earners is false. That's the narrative the red pill puts forth to appease the male ego. But much like you have your communities there are places women do the same and share their experiences. I've been in their company and I'm not speaking of the ones on social media saying what they deserve.

But the real McCoys. They look the part. Dress the part. They're poised, intelligent and talented. They invest in themselves at a scale beyond the norm and it wasn't just material. They were learning languages, skills, taking classes and increasing their deportment. They worked on themselves while waiting for their complement and won't be alone. Because they understand the man who values that and his standard.

When a woman begins to pour into herself it moves her forward and expands her consciousness. Your problem isn't 6-6-6. It's that men aren't investing in themselves to the degree women are and they're outgrowing them. They're looking for someone who can take them beyond their experiences and that requires discretionary income.

You're also dealing with the realities of a hyper masculine ideal. Which is represented through the height and physique. There's a complementary hyper feminine standard for women. That's why they're slimming down and wearing corsets. I discussed this with @timewerx the other day. Attractiveness is entering a new dimension in our society. Plastic surgery was the first step but Ozempic took it to another level.

We're entering the era of the beautiful people and that's what they'll promote. The pendulum has swung and body positivity is out. 666 is the sign. For several years you've heard about women desiring tall men and high wage earners. But there wasn't a slogan because it didn't come from them.

This is meant to trigger men. It'll make you mad, despondent, violent or throw in the towel. They don't care as long as you're triggered. Don't let it get under your skin.

~bella

 

[Ignatius the Kiwi]

This is meant to trigger men. It'll make you mad, despondent, violent or throw in the towel. They don't care as long as you're triggered. Don't let it get under your skin.

~bebella

How is anything you've said contrary to what Redpillers say? Except that it's from a feminine perspective which justifies these high standards?

 

[bèlla]

How is anything you've said contrary to what Redpillers say? Except that it's from a feminine perspective which justifies these high standards?

No standard is inclusive. Whether it's height, weight, wealth or attractiveness. Someone falls short in the criteria they prefer. I don't have an issue with standards. No one can tell you what to like. They can advise you to expand your horizons. But at the end of the day you have to live with your choice not them. If that's a 5'10 goddess so be it. That's your thing.

There's no political correctness in companionship. You're talking about the person you'll spend your life with. The one you're willing to love, honor, serve and make sacrifices for. You can't dictate that for someone else. Because you don't have to walk it out they do.

All women aren't looking for men with those qualities. The ones who might give them a chance are overlooked. If the goal is partnership you focus your efforts on those who reciprocate not the unattainable.

Men didn't stop liking skinny women because some were overweight. He liked what he liked and dated accordingly. There were a lot of women on the sidelines who were frustrated because they passed them over and I told them something similar. You have two choices. Lose the weight or choose another guy. You're not going to change him and the same holds true.

It wasn't that long ago when that was the case and the men told them no. They weren't going to compromise or give them a chance. Now the tables have turned and they're complaining. When you relegate people to numbers don't be surprised when it comes back to haunt you. And here we are.

~bella

 

[FireDragon76]

It's stupid and shallow, but it's nothing new.

 

[NBB]

This is what happens when you listen to red pill sources instead of real people. No woman refers to men as Chad's or the related nonsense that comes from that community. Using the lingo is more of a hindrance than not and it carries a stigma. Most associate it with misogyny and incels.

The belief that women are in the dark about high wage earners is false. That's the narrative the red pill puts forth to appease the male ego. But much like you have your communities there are places women do the same and share their experiences. I've been in their company and I'm not speaking of the ones on social media saying what they deserve.

But the real McCoys. They look the part. Dress the part. They're poised, intelligent and talented. They invest in themselves at a scale beyond the norm and it wasn't just material. They were learning languages, skills, taking classes and increasing their deportment. They worked on themselves while waiting for their complement and won't be alone. Because they understand the man who values that and his standard.

When a woman begins to pour into herself it moves her forward and expands her consciousness. Your problem isn't 6-6-6. It's that men aren't investing in themselves to the degree women are and they're outgrowing them. They're looking for someone who can take them beyond their experiences and that requires discretionary income.

You're also dealing with the realities of a hyper masculine ideal. Which is represented through the height and physique. There's a complementary hyper feminine standard for women. That's why they're slimming down and wearing corsets. I discussed this with @timewerx the other day. Attractiveness is entering a new dimension in our society. Plastic surgery was the first step but Ozempic took it to another level.

We're entering the era of the beautiful people and that's what they'll promote. The pendulum has swung and body positivity is out. 666 is the sign. For several years you've heard about women desiring tall men and high wage earners. But there wasn't a slogan because it didn't come from them.

This is meant to trigger men. It'll make you mad, despondent, violent or throw in the towel. They don't care as long as you're triggered. Don't let it get under your skin.

~bella

I'm not even from usa.
Myself if i would get married God needs to get me one, i don't want to do mistakes. But i am not looking because i have other things to take care of.
Also, i avoid having animosity towards women, i think 'red pill' videos comments etc, bash women too much, even if they would have a point, is a place where there is too much animosity, so i try to avoid getting my mind biased.

Between autism, that it costs me greatly to even approach people to make friends, and other issues, i am at a point that i don't care much about this, i care about being healed spiritually and have a good relationship with God.

 

[bèlla]

Also, i avoid having animosity towards women, i think 'red pill' videos comments etc, bash women too much, even if they would have a point, is a place where there is too much animosity, so i try to avoid getting my mind biased.

This is the result of our sinfulness and chickens coming home to roost. For the longest time it was acceptable to reduce women to numbers based on their appearance. While many didn't limit themselves to that alone the practice remained nonetheless.

I believe we are multifaceted. Some qualities grab our attention more than others but that doesn't mean nothing lies beneath. I've had my share of wounded birds as close friends and helped them to heal and embrace their loveliness. I know there's more than meets the eye.

But we've reached a point in society where reason is fleeting. While I understand preferences and attraction. Only the devil could have weaponized what men once applied to women and used it against them through a slogan.

Between autism, that it costs me greatly to even approach people to make friends, and other issues, i am at a point that i don't care much about this, i care about being healed spiritually and have a good relationship with God.

Ask for the Lord's healing and restoration and pray against infirmity and all helper spirits. May He grant you your heart's desires and bring you into the fullness of all He has on your behalf. God bless you.

~bella

 

[2PhiloVoid]

People are just discovering what dating profiles with 6-6-6 mean. No, it’s not satanic — but it could lead you to a devilishly eligible bachelor.

The 6-6-6 rule refers to men who are 6 feet tall, have six-pack abs and make over six figures.

Some women claim to use the rule to find men who fit the bill and help narrow down the seemingly never-ending lineup of potential matches on dating apps.

Continued below.

Women are using the 6-6-6 dating rule to find the perfect man — but is it hurting their chance at finding love?

Some women claim to use the rule to find men who fit the bill and help narrow down the seemingly never ending lineup of potential matches on dating apps.

nypost.com

Seriously??????

................. and people wonder "why" I'm a Premillennialist.

 

[timewerx]

You're also dealing with the realities of a hyper masculine ideal. Which is represented through the height and physique. There's a complementary hyper feminine standard for women. That's why they're slimming down and wearing corsets. I discussed this with @timewerx the other day. Attractiveness is entering a new dimension in our society. Plastic surgery was the first step but Ozempic took it to another level.

I don't fit the gold standard, in fact, I'm light years away from the gold standard. Yet I'm still trying to improve myself purely for health and spiritual purposes. Like I'm keeping in shape but doing it entirely with diet and exercise. No surgery, no drugs.

I'm not concerned not fitting the gold standard anyway, I'm not looking for women who fits the gold standard and I'm assuming there are also women who thinks the same because otherwise, I'll have no hope of finding someone!

 

[2PhiloVoid]

This is what happens when you listen to red pill sources instead of real people. No woman refers to men as Chad's or the related nonsense that comes from that community. Using the lingo is more of a hindrance than not and it carries a stigma. Most associate it with misogyny and incels.

The belief that women are in the dark about high wage earners is false. That's the narrative the red pill puts forth to appease the male ego. But much like you have your communities there are places women do the same and share their experiences. I've been in their company and I'm not speaking of the ones on social media saying what they deserve.

But the real McCoys. They look the part. Dress the part. They're poised, intelligent and talented. They invest in themselves at a scale beyond the norm and it wasn't just material. They were learning languages, skills, taking classes and increasing their deportment. They worked on themselves while waiting for their complement and won't be alone. Because they understand the man who values that and his standard.

When a woman begins to pour into herself it moves her forward and expands her consciousness. Your problem isn't 6-6-6. It's that men aren't investing in themselves to the degree women are and they're outgrowing them. They're looking for someone who can take them beyond their experiences and that requires discretionary income.

You're also dealing with the realities of a hyper masculine ideal. Which is represented through the height and physique. There's a complementary hyper feminine standard for women. That's why they're slimming down and wearing corsets. I discussed this with @timewerx the other day. Attractiveness is entering a new dimension in our society. Plastic surgery was the first step but Ozempic took it to another level.

We're entering the era of the beautiful people and that's what they'll promote. The pendulum has swung and body positivity is out. 666 is the sign. For several years you've heard about women desiring tall men and high wage earners. But there wasn't a slogan because it didn't come from them.

This is meant to trigger men. It'll make you mad, despondent, violent or throw in the towel. They don't care as long as you're triggered. Don't let it get under your skin.

~bella

The strange thing for me in all of this is the apparent felt need among many women AND men to identify their hypersexualization in what seem to be clearly anti-Christian contexts. "We're not just liberal anymore; Oh no, sugar! We're anti-Christian and we're done with all that Jesus stuff!"

The social future isn't looking very rosy.

 

[FireDragon76]

The strange thing for me in all of this is the apparent felt need among many women AND men to identify their hypersexualization in what seem to be clearly anti-Christian contexts. "We're not just liberal anymore; Oh no, sugar! We're anti-Christian and we're done with all that Jesus stuff!"

The social future isn't looking very rosy.

Young people are working through religious trauma en masse, after the rise of fundamentalism in the 1980's and 1990's. Sometimes that involves alot of drama and poor choices, but I can understand where they are coming from.

 

[bèlla]

The strange thing for me in all of this is the apparent felt need among many women AND men to identify their hypersexualization in what seem to be clearly anti-Christian contexts. "We're not just liberal anymore; Oh no, sugar! We're anti-Christian and we're done with all that Jesus stuff!"

The social future isn't looking very rosy.

I don't believe this is genuine. I hadn't looked at the article and pieces in the Post are for the populace. I was on a site with profiles three weeks ago and didn't see the slogan. Nor have I encountered anyone insisting on a six-pack in addition to the pair. I believe that was added to facilitate the 6-6-6 moniker.

The piece is meant to encourage its use among women and make men despondent about their prospects. They want to trigger them and it's evident in the symbolism and timing of the article.

It was right before a full moon and eclipse. You'll notice a lot of orange in the images and there's a reason for that. We've entered the ember months (all months ending in ember) and the period is more challenging in the spirit realm and requires reinforcement. Some people produce ember month prayers for that reason.

Symbolically speaking, orange relates to fires and decapitation in this period. You may have noticed its appearance in the media and associated it with fall. But that's not what it means all the time and you have to look at the piece to see who's losing their head or taking it.

The ideal is surrounded by the hue and represents the aggressor while the others are victims. The obvious outcome of something like this is negative. Back in the day men rated women by numbers. But only the devil could turn that on its head and create a slogan that uses the same against them.

You can't change your height and impressing the need for greater income in this economy would be frustrating. This is a period when a man is more likely to need support than demands. That's why they did it. They know layoffs are increasing and things are getting harder. You destroy your enemy while he's weak.

~bella

 

[Michie]

This so-called rule is not new. It’s been a standard for some delusionals since 2019 or before.

Here is what it used to mean but it has since devolved.

Simple as this sounds, there’s a lot packed in here: The guy to date is 1) open to marriage and kids, 2) likely to become an involved parent and member of the community, 3) a natural leader, and 4) possessed of a wholesome, all-American vibe. These are specific standards, but they’re broad — lots of different kinds of men could meet them — and they are likely to offer the best chance at long-term compatibility.

It’s just another one of those silly fads that spread like wildfire on the internet.

Can’t link the paragraph due to language.