- May 28, 2018
- 14,313
- 6,389
- 69
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Widowed
Mark Quayle said:
Now if you can present for me that the command to be without sin implies the ability to obey that command, have at it.
John does not imply that we must be completely sinless, but what has that to do with the question of free will in Salvation and Justification?
You keep slipping in and out of the question of free will in Salvation.
What questions were 'nonsensical'?
Now if you can present for me that the command to be without sin implies the ability to obey that command, have at it.
Justification is needed 'for eternal life'. Not Sanctification.Sanctification is to be made holy. And yet you posed the challenge:
I presented verses that show that sin can and must be overcome. John seems to imply that we must be completely sinless while the church in any case came to reject such an extreme rigorist view- as pertaining to a possibility in this life, anyway. Perfection must nonetheless be the goal, however; that's the journey we must be on. And so why would you ask nonsensical questions if you know that sanctification is necessary in order to gain eternal life? You're too intelligent not to get the point even if you disagree with it. But I'm not sure you do
John does not imply that we must be completely sinless, but what has that to do with the question of free will in Salvation and Justification?
You keep slipping in and out of the question of free will in Salvation.
What questions were 'nonsensical'?
Upvote
0