Seems you don't understand what justification is.
Justification is a
declaration of "not guilty," a
sentence of acquittal, a
pronouncement of sin removed.
It is a
forensic righteousness,
not an
actual righteousness, which is
sanctification (
Ro 6:19).
Your theological understanding is beyond reproach. Where did you earn your PhD degree(s)?
Scripture passages on justificaton can be interpreted as either before sanctification, with ongoing sanctification and as the final result of the finishing Faith in Christ. Depending on one's church doctrine and/or allowing His Word via His Holy Spirit as your Lord and primary counselor / teacher.
The RCC as well as Protestantism would agree with your order instead of Paul's order (1 Corinthians 6:11) with Justification following sanctification, instead of your order with justification preceding sanctification.
10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor those habitually drunk, nor verbal abusers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.
11 Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.
Possibly as early as 325 AD (if not earlier) the "mother church" of Christendom decided (as the Vicar of Christ) that Paul's order was wrong with "justification" taking place as early when an infant of Christian parents is sprinkled with "holy water" and born again.
The Pope stands in the place of Jesus Himself as The "Vicar of Christ on earth."
Protestants realizing the rational of RCC "salvation theology"... likewise choose to believe that dear Paul's order was
wrong (1 Corinthians 6:11). Both (RCC and Protestantism) may also believe that dear Paul was also wrong when he talks about ...
"working out one's salvation with fear and trembling."
Salvation is the forgiveness of sin through faith in the atoning work and person of Jesus Christ (Ro 3:25)
Whose faith? The doctrinal faith of the "mother church" and Protestant churches and the faith of a new Christian that is assured that their past, present
and even future sins are already forgiven (without repentance?) Religion by it's very nature is either very demanding or tells a new seeker-sensitive convert what they would prefer hearing.
How can you be justified (declared not guilty, sin removed, acquitted) before it actually takes place in salvation?
Your question goes to show how you have been indoctrinated by centuries of the mother church believing that Paul's order is wrong. What you need to do is see that you're order of Salvation has been perpetuated for centuries by Christendom, but according to Paul was apparently not the undertanding during the early 1st century "church". Only the true "church" can be "justified" by living a holy, righteous (sanctified life) before being JUSTIFIED to receive glorified body..
A seeker-sensitive believer is drawn to Jesus by inspiring testimonies of the Wonder-Working Power: Unexplained Healings, Miracles, Deliverances, Wisdom, Words of Knowledge and testimonies of His Abiding LOVE. And as Paul says running the race with such Persistence, Grace & Love against at times what seems to be Mission Impossible, but yet prevail
in Him and receive the Salvation Prize (glorified body).
According to your theology (order of Salvation) ... you interpret justification scrptures as taking place before sanctification with new converts being first "justified", but a lackluster track record of holy righteousness. Some church doctrine also tells the parents that when and infant, child or adult is water baptized they are also sanctified as well as justified.
Then they were never saved and justified in the first place, they were tares, not wheat.
That's a far-flung "tare" conclusion ... So your theology is that they are first "saved" and then "justified" but not really if they remain a nominal, lukewarm Believer
When it comes to nomnal lukewarm christians (of which there are more than a few in America they are not tares just lackluster with one foot in church and the other foot in the world. They may only attend church a few times a year ... maybe just Easter Service and Christmas primarily for the kids. Then when they fill out a Barna survey they count themselves as Christian (maybe even born again).
So according to a Barna Poll America is a Christian nation with millions and millions of "born again" Believers. Many Believers have repeated a prayer over TV by Church Pastor evangelist that tells them they are now "born again". Would you really consider these thousands upon thousands to be tares ... didn't think so.
Do you consider a 7th-Day Christian to be a tare ... didn't think so. Do you consider a back-sliding Christian that only attends churches when a special guest speaker is bringing an interesting message e.g. about UFOs, location of Noah's Ark, the Rpture, etc. to be a tare ... didn't think so either. The speaker could possibly be a tare, but not necesairly being a Christain who believes Christianity should be Fun. He/she is a "born again" Christian and in fact may have a special calling.to witness to ungrounded Believers that prefer a little entertainment in a service ... like the Pastor telling a funny joke/story before he brings a message of feeling good about yourself and self-worth.
In the parables to the Jews, you can be in the kingdom, but not of the kingdom.
So could that likewise apply to some
in Christendom, but not truly
of Faith? Now we know how to distinquish between in and of according to your theologsical interpretations
