Absolute proof.. can't deny.. the earth is flat

[trophy33]

Oops!

How do you know they are craters ?

Because thats how impact craters look like. We can witness the process and we can experimentally repeat the process with the same outcome.

 

[Apple Sky]

 

[Jipsah]

Before spouting off here why don't you go & do some research to what 'sillica aerogel' actually is ?

I've known what it is for a great many years. Wonderful insulation. It doesn't float in the sky, sorry.

 

[Jipsah]

Like I said, Just pictures.......... We don't know for sure these are creators.

Lunar moles.

 

[Jipsah]

They don't, God doesn't chuck stones at the earth.

Giant space geezers, then.

 

[prodromos]

In the Flat-Earth model, the Sun and Moon spotlights are perpetually hovering over and parallel to the surface of the Earth. From our vantage point, due to the law of perspective, the two luminaries appear to rise up the eastern horizon, reach their peaks high overhead, and then sink below the western horizon. They do not escape to the underside of the flat Earth as scoffing detractors often imagine, but rather rotate concentric clockwise circles around the circumference from tropic to tropic. The appearance of rising, peaking and setting is due to the common law of perspective where tall objects appear high overhead when nearby, but at a distance gradually lower towards the vanishing point...

Your post and the linked video do not address the fact that the sun and moon remain exactly the same size from rising to setting. The law of perspective would require that they get smaller as they near the horizon. They don't, thus your explanation does not pass the smell test.

 

[Apple Sky]

Because thats how impact craters look like. We can witness the process and we can experimentally repeat the process with the same outcome.

But still you can't prove that's what they are.........

 

[Apple Sky]

Your post and the linked video do not address the fact that the sun and moon remain exactly the same size from rising to setting. The law of perspective would require that they get smaller as they near the horizon. They don't, thus your explanation does not pass the smell test.

But it does prove that you can bring the sun back into magnification, this proves that the sun is far away from our prospective viewing & that the sun is still there, but to far away for us to see it, hence the night time.

 

[trophy33]

But still you can't prove that's what they are.........

I personally cannot prove it to you personally. But thats fine, I cannot even prove to you that for example America exists, when you reject photos, videos, literature and experience of other people.

However, it has nothing to do with knowing what craters are, generally, if somebody is reasonable.

 

[prodromos]

But it does prove that you can bring the sun back into magnification, this proves that the sun is far away from our prospective viewing & that the sun is still there.

No it doesn't.

 

[Apple Sky]

No it doesn't.

Why doesn't it ?

 

[Apple Sky]

I personally cannot prove it to you personally.

I thought not.

 

[trophy33]

I thought not.

Thats all right. We have to accept that convincing an unreasonable, irrational person who believes all kinds of nonsense and in the same time rejects all the solid evidence, reasoning and the general human knowledge is not a necessary goal of online discussions.

Its just how we spend our free time - sometimes its more useful, sometimes less.

 

[Apple Sky]

Thats all right. We have to accept that convincing an unreasonable, irrational person who believes all kinds of nonsense and in the same time rejects all the solid evidence, reasoning and the general human knowledge is not a necessary goal of online discussions.

Who's we & who is it your trying to convince

 

[trophy33]

Who's we & who is it your trying to convince

We - the participants on this forums.

I am not trying to convince anyone, and namely not the irrational people like you. If you will read my post again and more carefully, you may understand that that is what I am saying.

 

[rturner76]

Ok... try to prove me wrong.. I have been on the fence with this "flat earth" thing.. but I have news..

The earth is 71% water and it is NOT carbonated...
So.... it's flat....

 

[Apple Sky]

I am not trying to convince anyone,

Good.

 

[rturner76]

Empirical proof that the Earth is round.
Naval and air exploration
Since the 1500s, many people have sailed or flown completely around Earth in all directions, and none have discovered an edge or impenetrable barrier. (See Arctic exploration and History of Antarctica.)


A ton of different ways that prove we live on a sphere. If you really want the truth, try to debunk some of these methods that have determined this. If you are still unable to believe in a sperical Earth, I think it's only fair to acknowledge that you believe in a flat Earth on faith alone and not by the scientific method.

Empirical evidence for the spherical shape of Earth - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[prodromos]

Why doesn't it ?

I've explained it to you twice now, and for the third time, the sun and moon do not get smaller as they get further away, thus your claim that the sun and moon disappear due to the law of perspective is false.

 

[Jipsah]

But still you can't prove that's what they are.........

Welll yeah, we can. Y'all just refuse to look at the proof.