Absolute proof.. can't deny.. the earth is flat

[Apple Sky]

Trees, plants & flowers grow towards the light upright, so how do they manage to grow down under in Oz ?

The world is magical, not only does water bend but plants & trees can grow side-wards and downwards.

 

[prodromos]

Trees, plants & flowers grow towards the light upright, so how do they manage to grow down under in Oz ?

View attachment 351851

View attachment 351852

The world is magical, not only does water bend but plants & trees can grow side-wards and downwards.

"Down" is towards the centre of the Earth. "Up" is away from the centre of the Earth. Nothing magical about it.

 

[Apple Sky]

"Down" is towards the centre of the Earth. "Up" is away from the centre of the Earth. Nothing magical about it.

There is when water bends lol'z......

 

[Apple Sky]

Why is the sky blue? What is the firmament made out of? What is the dome above us? The answer may be something known as silica aerogel.

 

[Jipsah]

Trees, plants & flowers grow towards the light upright, so how do they manage to grow down under in Oz ?

View attachment 351851

View attachment 351852

The world is magical, not only does water bend but plants & trees can grow side-wards and downwards.

Down is toward the center of the earth. Up is toward the sky. North and south are directions on the surface of the globe. Lets not be illiterate.

 

[Jipsah]

Trees, plants & flowers grow towards the light upright, so how do they manage to grow down under in Oz ?

View attachment 351851

View attachment 351852

The world is magical, not only does water bend but plants & trees can grow side-wards and downwards.

And there we have the summary of "flat earth.

 

[Lost4words]

And there we have the summary of "flat earth.

Exactly!!

 

[lifepsyop]

Pseudo science. Flerfies have to gen up an "explanation" for stuff disappearing below the horizon, so they invent a "mist" that's invisible up close but obscures stuff at a distance. See also, "bravo sierra"
a

It's conventional accepted science as far as I can tell... Even "glerfies" use this as an explanation for why you can still see objects on the horizon that should have long since completely disappeared behind the curve of the earth.

from wikipedia:

Atmospheric refraction is the deviation of light or other electromagnetic wave from a straight line as it passes through the atmosphere due to the variation in air density as a function of height.[1] This refraction is due to the velocity of light through air decreasing (the refractive index increases) with increased density. Atmospheric refraction near the ground produces mirages. Such refraction can also raise or lower, or stretch or shorten, the images of distant objects without involving mirages. Turbulent air can make distant objects appear to twinkle or shimmer. The term also applies to the refraction of sound. Atmospheric refraction is considered in measuring the position of both celestial and terrestrial objects.

Atmospheric refraction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The more distant an object is on the horizon, the more atmosphere between it and the observer, thus the greater likelihood of distortion of the image within that atmosphere.

For argument's sake, assuming an infinitely flat plane receding into the horizon, you would undoubtedly observe significant refraction as more and more atmosphere inevitably overwhelms the physical object receding more and more into the distance and getting smaller and smaller.

 

[prodromos]

It's conventional accepted science as far as I can tell... Even "glerfies" use this as an explanation for why you can still see objects on the horizon that should have long since completely disappeared behind the curve of the earth.

"glerfies", how cute.
The difference between your claims and ours is that we can demonstrate the observed refraction experimentally whereas yours is just hand wavy magic.

The more distant an object is on the horizon, the more atmosphere between it and the observer, thus the greater likelihood of distortion of the image within that atmosphere.

For argument's sake, assuming an infinitely flat plane receding into the horizon, you would undoubtedly observe significant refraction as more and more atmosphere inevitably overwhelms the physical object receding more and more into the distance and getting smaller and smaller.

Take the sun for example. You claim it is getting more and more distant, however it doesn't get smaller but stays exactly the same size, right down to where it disappears, and as it reaches the horizon, refraction causes the bottom part of the sun to remain visible despite having passed the horizon and makes the sun appear flattened. If the earth was flat then the sun would get smaller as it receded and according to your claims it should "gradually" be obsured over time by the ever increasing depth of atmosphere, not vanish in a matter of minutes.

 

[Jipsah]

Why is the sky blue?

Highest frequency range in the visible spectrum. ROY G BIV, right? For a varety of suspiciously tech-geeky reasons, the higher frequencis of light make it through the atmoshere better than the lower ones, so you get more blue and above above. Our eyes aren't as sensitive to frequencies hjigher than blue, so it ends up looking blue to us.

r, if you prefer, the sky is blue because God designed it that way, which is also true, it just doesn't give the you technical details

What is the firmament made out of?

Air.

What is the dome above us?

The amosphere.

The answer may be something known as silica aerogel.

That's more likely than concrete blocks, but not by much. A very Flerfie idea, amyway, but no less goofy than any other flat earth foolishness.

 

[comana]

Tell that to God, he's the one who created a stationary level earth with a protective cover.

Protective from what. How to the meteors get through?

 

[Apple Sky]

That's more likely than concrete blocks, but not by much. A very Flerfie idea, amyway, but no less goofy than any other flat earth foolishness.

Before spouting off here why don't you go & do some research to what 'sillica aerogel' actually is ?

 

[Apple Sky]

Protective from what. How to the meteors get through?

They don't, God doesn't chuck stones at the earth.

 

[trophy33]

They don't, God doesn't chuck stones at the earth.

And btw, the same craters are on the Moon, on Mars etc.

 

[Apple Sky]

Take the sun for example. You claim it is getting more and more distant, however it doesn't get smaller but stays exactly the same size, right down to where it disappears, and as it reaches the horizon, refraction causes the bottom part of the sun to remain visible despite having passed the horizon and makes the sun appear flattened. If the earth was flat then the sun would get smaller as it receded and according to your claims it should "gradually" be obsured over time by the ever increasing depth of atmosphere, not vanish in a matter of minutes.

In the Flat-Earth model, the Sun and Moon spotlights are perpetually hovering over and parallel to the surface of the Earth. From our vantage point, due to the law of perspective, the two luminaries appear to rise up the eastern horizon, reach their peaks high overhead, and then sink below the western horizon. They do not escape to the underside of the flat Earth as scoffing detractors often imagine, but rather rotate concentric clockwise circles around the circumference from tropic to tropic. The appearance of rising, peaking and setting is due to the common law of perspective where tall objects appear high overhead when nearby, but at a distance gradually lower towards the vanishing point...

 

[Apple Sky]

And btw, the same craters are on the Moon, on Mars etc.

Nobody knows if this crater was caused by meteorite, these craters could have been mining quarries, mined by the Giants who were on the earth in those days, as for the moon, we only have pictures of these craters & there's no such thing as the planets, these are what some call ' Wondering Stars'.

 

[trophy33]

Nobody knows if this crater was caused by meteorite, these craters could have been mining quarries, mined by the Giants

And these giants have been mining also the Moon?

 

[Apple Sky]

And these giants have been mining also the Moon?

Like I said, Just pictures.......... We don't know for sure these are creators.

 

[trophy33]

Like I said, Just pictures.......... We don't know for sure these are creators.

Not sure about creators, but we do know these are craters.

 

[Apple Sky]

Not sure about creators, but we do know these are craters.

Oops!

How do you know they are craters ?