• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is modern secular society headed down the path to Sodom and Gomorrah.

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,664
1,661
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟313,429.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I've always been under the impression that 'being a Christian' in today's world could be fraught with political tensions. I'm not surprised that these tensions are present and seem to be growing, really. What I am surprised at is how many fellow Christians express surprise or even panic about the way society, and the world, is changing today.

For those who hold to some sort of Dominionist or Charismatic 'Kingdom Now' theology, I know the growing political tensions look like an incursion upon what has been deemed by them to be "their Christian rights and their Christian nation" (i.e. a perspective held by a number of folks here in the U.S.).
Ok I had to look this up as I wasn't sure what it meant. I have heard of Charismatic but understood this as more a prophetic belief, with healing and speakinging in tongues and all that.

But I am not sure how this group lives out their beliefs. Are they more political than most Christians. See politics as a means to bring about Gods Kingdom. We don't really have any groups like that though we do have pretty lively Charismatic churchs like Hill Song who are pretty out there.
While I don't hold a dogmatic view on eschatology or politics, some of the difference in my expectancy about ongoing tensions and what to do about them may be due to my own Premillennial and Historicized leanings in eschatology which shade my understanding of World History and World Politics. What we have today is, I think, a further permutation of various confluences in social thought which have been coming together for the last three or four centuries. But so many other people seem to think it's a "sudden onslaught" of moral upset. It's not.
It could be both I think. We are the product of our history while at the same time the culmination of that history, the evolution of thinking has actually created that sense of onslaught.

Which sort of makes sense. As I mentioned earlier at least for the west we have for the first time in a long time rejected God from the public square. This is a pretty big change in our recent history. I can see that change in my own lifetime. Its a different landscape to navigate now to what it was even 10 years ago.

Its like there was something brewing, it had not yet fully been expressed and infiltrated throughout mainstream society. But then certain events happened ie the internet, 9/11, social media and Covid. These events have rapidly changed our worldview and thinking.

So in some ways we have experienced a lot that people may feel uncertianty and worry like we are going somewhere fast but not sure exactly where that is. Cerainly we are seeing more and more people becoming anxious especially young people. Maybe the past is catching up with us so to speak.
 
Last edited:
  • Useful
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
7,391
3,721
82
Goldsboro NC
✟247,478.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I think social norm represents much more than what is legal as far as what is conducive of a healthy society. I mean the social norm is that porn is available without restrictions for potentially anyone. Sure parents can set filters but out in the public square theres no restrictions. Even for adoslecents and young adults its unhealthy being so easily available in that its sets an unreal idea and expectation around sex and relationships.
But the principle reason you object to it appears to be that it conflicts with the unreal ideas and expectations around sex and relationships that Christians wish to impose on them.
Then theres the celeb role models who promote unreal ideas around sex in the media and the unlimited access to all sorts of crazy stuff, violence, sicko stuff that infliltrates into young peoples minds making them mentally ill and suicidal. How is that good. It may all be legal but its sure screwing people up.

No it hasn't. In fact there were laws in our distant past that forbid adultery. Then it remained a strong social norm for a long time. Even sex before marriage wasa taboo. Divorce was rare and marriages lasted a lifetime.

Now marriage and long term monogamous relationships are a dying breed and as a result we see than carnage and chaos this has created. The fact is marriage actually makes people more healthy and better behaved. Its the foundation for the family and the family is the foundation of any strong society.

That marriage and families, fatherhood has completely broken down should be a massive concern. But it seems for those who promote post modernist ideologies its a price they are willing to pay for individual freedoms.

I am 100% behind you on that one. But as I pointed out we should be able to level the same amount of criticizism at any ideological belief that is promoting extreme and unreal ideas and beliefs.
Which is why Christianity is coming under increasing criticism.
Just because some of the ideological beliefs about how society should be ordered don't have religious garb about them doesn't mean they are not motivated by unfounded metaphysical beliefs.

First, "not considered moral" is not based on science so your conflating two different things. It may be that what a society considers moral is actually immoral as we have seen with many societies like the Nazis or even strong socialism like in Russia.

Second what exactly is my narrative. How do I know you are not assuming what I am saying based on your own preconcieved beliefs and assumption. From the examples you are giving these seem more minority Christian ideas and yet I have stated time and time again that this is not my belief and even condemned it.

So what exactly do you think my narrative is. So far your misrepresenting it and thats not a good start.
It all seems be based on your idea that "Western Culture is the vessel in which Christ will be brought to the world".
We can know. I mentioned this that we are rational and moral creatures and have the knowledge and ability to derive the moral truth. Its already in us. Its the convergence of objective reality and lived reality. Its the culmination of our lived experience throughout history from which we derive these truths and morals from.

We created Human Rights from the horrors of war, the shock of how evil humans can be. It scared us to the point that we engraved these truths in unwritten law like the laws of physics every bit as real and any solid object. Part of that lived reality is that without some reality outside and above us that sets truth and moral standards we are doomed as we cannot ourselves be capable of moral truth.

But right now that is what we have been reduced to. Moral relativity, self referential truths, humans are the gods of truth and morals and there is not objectively tru moral like laws.
Laws are different from morals.
If thats the case then why are certain social norms that influence policy and law and underpinned by certain moral values being favored over others. Why are certain nobel causes being used to smuggling in ideological beliefs and not based on facts and reality. It seems hypocritical.
That is exactly what you appear to be doing.
OK I thought you were saying they were more a extreme arm of the Right. Now your saying the Right generally is an extremist party. Thats a big call. I am not sure that stands up to scrutiny.
You said yourself that you don't always follow US politics. The GOP has become a Christian Nationalist party.
It may be that what you percieve is extreme may just be a normal and commonsense reality that has been twisted by the Left into something extreme. That is what usually happens from both sides.

Once again I hav'nt followed US politics in enough detail to know this is true or not and that your interpretation is not biased. Both sides enage in cancelling each other and trying to sidestep the issues and truth. Cerainly politics has become more partisan.

But fundementally I disagree and I think its the Right that are more willing to talk, to discuss the issues with all cards on the table. Thats because primarily they have nothing to hide. Many of these issues are the same basic issues that everyone agreed with in the past. Its just that the Left have moved away from them and not the Right.
That is your delusion, Many of these issues were never agreed on in the past but enforced because Christians had more social power than they do now.
The fact that generally the vast majority of society was Christian or had some belief in God and supported these values in the not too distant past shows that the middle ground was based on these values and since society has moved away from this thats mostly to Leftist ideology shows that its the Left who are out of line and not the right.

'Thats not saying the Right are also now out of step. They are falling into the same game ideological thinking and both sides are now engaging in identity politics and society as a whole is less Christian and more secular in its beliefs and thinking which feeds the chaos.

Its history repeating itself. When society breaks down and people become more polarised all the extremes come out on the edges which eventaully become the middle. So the extreme Christian Right are like the Church in the past once again pushing extreme ideas.

But now its not just the church but 101 other extremist groups like antisemetist, Wokist, Trans and gender ideologues, many new terror groups even on home soil, new political groups like ANTIFA, BLM, Extinction Rebellion ect ect etc etc.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Round and round we'll go!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,218
11,278
56
Space Mountain!
✟1,333,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ok I had to look this up as I wasn't sure what it meant. I have heard of Charismatic but understood this as more a prophetic belief, with healing and speakinging in tongues and all that.

But I am not sure how this group lives out their beliefs. Are they more political than most Christians. See politics as a means to bring about Gods Kingdom. We don't really have any groups like that though we do have pretty lively Charismatic churchs like Hill Song who are pretty out there.
In the U.S., we have all sorts of permutations of "faith" and some of those are extremely political as a central part of their theology rather than parsing it out as another category of civic life. And sometimes, that theology invokes survivalist mentality and all too quickly resorting to living "by the sword" when politics don't play in their favor.
It could be both I think. We are the product of our history while at the same time the culmination of that history, the evolution of thinking has actually created that sense of onslaught.

Which sort of makes sense. As I mentioned earlier at least for the west we have for the first time in a long time rejected God from the public square. This is a pretty big change in our recent history. I can see that change in my own lifetime. Its a different landscape to navigate now to what it was even 10 years ago.

Its like there was something brewing, it had not yet fully been expressed and infiltrated throughout mainstream society. But then certain events happened ie the internet, 9/11, social media and Covid. These events have rapidly changed our worldview and thinking.

So in some ways we have experienced a lot that people may feel uncertianty and worry like we are going somewhere fast but not sure exactly where that is. Cerainly we are seeing more and more people becoming anxious especially young people. Maybe the past is catching up with us so to speak.

In a manner of speaking.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,664
1,661
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟313,429.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But the principle reason you object to it appears to be that it conflicts with the unreal ideas and expectations around sex and relationships that Christians wish to impose on them.
No I think this is what people do with identity politics. They choose to judge a group by the stereotypical assumptions of that group ie that the only reasons Christians promote certain beliefs and views is because of belief alone. That there is no rationality to their position which is not the case.

As I think I m,ewntioned to you earlier Christian truths and morals also have some common sense and truth about them in the real world, with our real lived experience. Think about all the important issues around sex which Christians support and you will find factual evidence and real lived experience which supports those truths and morals.

If Christ real and represents the truth as He claims then His truths have to also stand up in fact and lived reality. So a Christian can be confident that His teachings will stand up to any scrutiny.
Which is why Christianity is coming under increasing criticism.
I think thats part of it and rightly so. The Church and some Christians have acted badly and that has tarnished the reputation of Christians. But I think it has now gone beyond that. Its now targeting Christians perse. Its labelling all Christians that way when it was actually the minority who had done wrong.

Unfortuantely that minority as with any extreme ideology and behaviour always makes the loudest noise and is noticed. People don't talk about or acknowledge the many Christians working quietly behind the scenes doing Gods work. But unfortunately thanks to identity politics they have judged by the negative narratives pushed in society that all Christians are bad and as a result Christianity itself is bad.

But to be fair if we are going to do that we need to apply the same standard of criticisim to all groups that may push their agendas. But thats not happening. The evidence shows that Christians and Christian groups and organisations are being unfairly targeted and descriminated against while other ideological groups are overlooked. That smells of partisan politics and bias.
It all seems be based on your idea that "Western Culture is the vessel in which Christ will be brought to the world".
If Christ is the foundation of Christianity then the west was the vehicle by which the Gospel was brought to western civilisation warts and all. If it wasn't for the west and its beliefs about allowing the early church to grow and develop the Christian message then the west would not have Christianity full stop. As compared to say Asian, Russian or Middle Eastern cultures.

So in that sense its a blessing not because the west is Christian but because the west was the type of cul;ture that allowed Christianity to exist and develop. And this is also in line with the Gospel that it would first come to the Jews and then to the Gentiles. That is exactly what we should expect to have happened with the growth of the early Church. Despite in the end the wests growing rejection of that message.

But the principles that allowed the Christian church to flourish were also Christian values so it could not have happened any other way. The church would not have flourished under a culture that denied religious freedom. that upheld the freedoms we know in the west. Sothey sort of go hand in hand in some ways and that is the great aspect of western culture as opposed to other cultures.
Laws are different from morals.
They are still laws, unwritten laws on our hearts, our conscience. Behind the laws associated with how we treat others are morals. That is why we make them laws because its morally wrong. Killing, stealing, raping, assualting others which basically covers most of the law happen to also have a moral equivalence. Like I said we use to have a legal law that adultery was against the law.
That is exactly what you appear to be doing.
How is that the case. Smuggling would imply a hidden agenda. Masking that agenda with a completely different cause or reason. But as far as I can see Christians cannot have an agenda because its well established what their position is. Theres nothing to hide anymore as Christianity has been one of the most scrutinised beliefs.

So when a Christian speaks their belief, the Christian truths and values we know exactly what they are and when they conflict theres no hidden agenda as Christians are attacked for those very truths. The fact that they are attacked for those truths and values shows people know exactly what they are and its more that they attack Christianity because it represents the opposite of what the attackers believe.

No because its an agenda, not because its false, not because its wrong or that anyone is trying to push this on other. Just simply for expressing that truth.
You said yourself that you don't always follow US politics. The GOP has become a Christian Nationalist party.
OK well that is probably a sign of the times for US politics that the system has got to this point. It also supports my point that politics and culture has become more polarised because if one side has got to the point of being purely motived by ideological belief then so has the other side in kind. Thats how it works.

The political system has become more personal, more about what beliefs and ideology people have rather than what is best for the nation politically, economically and socially. Identity belief is more important than any unified belief.
That is your delusion, Many of these issues were never agreed on in the past but enforced because Christians had more social power than they do now.
Like what. Once again the US may have some different dynamics going on as they seem to be more of a Christian nations that most. But what exactlt was it that people did not agree with in the past that Christians enforced.

Evenso if this is the case the point is that the Left have reacted in kind with their own extreme and enforced ideology. That is what usually happens with identity politics. One side goes to the extreme and the other reactes with an equal and opposite extreme.

All I know is that today with the rise of PC, Cancel Culture and Woke identity politics this has primarily been introduced by Leftist governments throughout the world because they are the ones in power at the moment. Its no coincident that all the radical groups we see today such as Extinction Rebellion, BLM, ANTIFA, Trans Activist, Anti Semetism, University activist groups, all have Leftist beliefs.

All I know is that its the Right, Conservative and Christian views that are being cancelled. A speaker at any university who may dare to speak about the reality of biological sex, that DEI is a descriminating ideology, that open borders in unreal will be shut down. All I know is that opinion polls and surveys show that a growing number of people are fearful of expressing the beliefs and views against what the Left push. Thats the reality.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,664
1,661
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟313,429.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In the U.S., we have all sorts of permutations of "faith" and some of those are extremely political as a central part of their theology rather than parsing it out as another category of civic life. And sometimes, that theology invokes survivalist mentality and all too quickly resorting to living "by the sword" when politics don't play in their favor.
OK I trust that your a neutral observer as I know you. Is the US Right now a Christian party. Or is is more about Conservation values that may be aligned with the same long held values they have always had. Perhaps just more vehemently expressed today.
In a manner of speaking.
Do you think that there is some truth to people feeling and believing that these are testing times in world politics, culture, belief across a number of issues. That we are moving towards some threshold of pivotal point in our history. Or is is just in peoples imagination.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Round and round we'll go!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,218
11,278
56
Space Mountain!
✟1,333,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
OK I trust that your a neutral observer as I know you. Is the US Right now a Christian party. Or is is more about Conservation values that may be aligned with the same long held values they have always had. Perhaps just more vehemently expressed today.
As far as I see, the US 'right' isn't specifically an only Christians club, but as most people here know, it is and has been very heavily promoted by conservative Christians within a spectrum of intensities, from older style, mainline Republicans to extremist-right type groups.

Somewhere within that mix is a Christian demographic of Dominionists / Theonomists and also Kingdom Now proponents who see their place as one that (by right) is to bring about the injection of Biblical Law into their long-term political goals.
Do you think that there is some truth to people feeling and believing that these are testing times in world politics, culture, belief across a number of issues. That we are moving towards some threshold of pivotal point in our history. Or is is just in peoples imagination.

Sure, we're living in testing times but I think we all know the jury is still out as to exactly what this means in exacting Eschatological terms.

Moreover, it's not as if the world has suddenly become a testing place for Christians. It was and has been this way well before 9/11, whether people have realized it or not. It's just that now, there are some additional anti-Christian elements in the world that have manifested, further complicating the political problems we already had, making some folks panicky.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
7,391
3,721
82
Goldsboro NC
✟247,478.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
No I think this is what people do with identity politics. They choose to judge a group by the stereotypical assumptions of that group ie that the only reasons Christians promote certain beliefs and views is because of belief alone. That there is no rationality to their position which is not the case.

As I think I m,ewntioned to you earlier Christian truths and morals also have some common sense and truth about them in the real world, with our real lived experience. Think about all the important issues around sex which Christians support and you will find factual evidence and real lived experience which supports those truths and morals.

If Christ real and represents the truth as He claims then His truths have to also stand up in fact and lived reality. So a Christian can be confident that His teachings will stand up to any scrutiny.
Too bad you don't know what they are.
I think thats part of it and rightly so. The Church and some Christians have acted badly and that has tarnished the reputation of Christians. But I think it has now gone beyond that. Its now targeting Christians perse. Its labelling all Christians that way when it was actually the minority who had done wrong.

Unfortuantely that minority as with any extreme ideology and behaviour always makes the loudest noise and is noticed. People don't talk about or acknowledge the many Christians working quietly behind the scenes doing Gods work. But unfortunately thanks to identity politics they have judged by the negative narratives pushed in society that all Christians are bad and as a result Christianity itself is bad.

But to be fair if we are going to do that we need to apply the same standard of criticisim to all groups that may push their agendas. But thats not happening. The evidence shows that Christians and Christian groups and organisations are being unfairly targeted and descriminated against while other ideological groups are overlooked. That smells of partisan politics and bias.

If Christ is the foundation of Christianity then the west was the vehicle by which the Gospel was brought to western civilisation warts and all. If it wasn't for the west and its beliefs about allowing the early church to grow and develop the Christian message then the west would not have Christianity full stop. As compared to say Asian, Russian or Middle Eastern cultures.

So in that sense its a blessing not because the west is Christian but because the west was the type of cul;ture that allowed Christianity to exist and develop. And this is also in line with the Gospel that it would first come to the Jews and then to the Gentiles. That is exactly what we should expect to have happened with the growth of the early Church. Despite in the end the wests growing rejection of that message.

But the principles that allowed the Christian church to flourish were also Christian values so it could not have happened any other way. The church would not have flourished under a culture that denied religious freedom. that upheld the freedoms we know in the west. Sothey sort of go hand in hand in some ways and that is the great aspect of western culture as opposed to other cultures.
That is just plain blasphemous and disgusting.
They are still laws, unwritten laws on our hearts, our conscience. Behind the laws associated with how we treat others are morals. That is why we make them laws because its morally wrong. Killing, stealing, raping, assualting others which basically covers most of the law happen to also have a moral equivalence. Like I said we use to have a legal law that adultery was against the law.

How is that the case. Smuggling would imply a hidden agenda. Masking that agenda with a completely different cause or reason. But as far as I can see Christians cannot have an agenda because its well established what their position is. Theres nothing to hide anymore as Christianity has been one of the most scrutinised beliefs.

So when a Christian speaks their belief, the Christian truths and values we know exactly what they are and when they conflict theres no hidden agenda as Christians are attacked for those very truths. The fact that they are attacked for those truths and values shows people know exactly what they are and its more that they attack Christianity because it represents the opposite of what the attackers believe.

No because its an agenda, not because its false, not because its wrong or that anyone is trying to push this on other. Just simply for expressing that truth.

OK well that is probably a sign of the times for US politics that the system has got to this point. It also supports my point that politics and culture has become more polarised because if one side has got to the point of being purely motived by ideological belief then so has the other side in kind. Thats how it works.

The political system has become more personal, more about what beliefs and ideology people have rather than what is best for the nation politically, economically and socially. Identity belief is more important than any unified belief.

Like what. Once again the US may have some different dynamics going on as they seem to be more of a Christian nations that most. But what exactlt was it that people did not agree with in the past that Christians enforced.
Prohibition is good example.
Evenso if this is the case the point is that the Left have reacted in kind with their own extreme and enforced ideology. That is what usually happens with identity politics. One side goes to the extreme and the other reactes with an equal and opposite extreme.

All I know is that today with the rise of PC, Cancel Culture and Woke identity politics this has primarily been introduced by Leftist governments throughout the world because they are the ones in power at the moment. Its no coincident that all the radical groups we see today such as Extinction Rebellion, BLM, ANTIFA, Trans Activist, Anti Semetism, University activist groups, all have Leftist beliefs.

All I know is that its the Right, Conservative and Christian views that are being cancelled. A speaker at any university who may dare to speak about the reality of biological sex, that DEI is a descriminating ideology, that open borders in unreal will be shut down. All I know is that opinion polls and surveys show that a growing number of people are fearful of expressing the beliefs and views against what the Left push. Thats the reality.
A speaker at any university ought to be shut down for speaking slanderous lies.. Even a Christian university should think twice about giving Mike time to a Christian who spews filth like that.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,664
1,661
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟313,429.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
As far as I see, the US 'right' isn't specifically an only Christians club, but as most people here know, it is and has been very heavily promoted by conservative Christians within a spectrum of intensities, from older style, mainline Republicans to extremist-right type groups.

Somewhere within that mix is a Christian demographic of Dominionists / Theonomists and also Kingdom Now proponents who see their place as one that (by right) is to bring about the injection of Biblical Law into their long-term political goals.
Ok this sounds a minority. If the Right is not exclusively a Christian party and there theres a Christian spectrum of denominations then this group of 'Dominionists / Theonomists and also Kingdom Now proponents' must be a minority. Aminority taking control of the rest of other Christians who may not take the same approach.

Perhaps thats the problem that its not so much the Christian values or message but that some are trying to apply it in a certain way according to their belief about how Christianity should be applied today.

But this is really the Rights version of Identity politics in this case using religious identity and and belief as the marker as opposed to say DEI ideology that uses race as the marker and deguises their agenda within the nobel cause of protection minorities. Or other ideological groups who may use their beliefs around gender, sex the environment as a nobel cause to push their beliefs.

For example often behind these nobel causes is a Marxist ideology when we peel back the good intentions. Just as these extreme Christian groups want to bring in the Kingdom of God now other groups want to bring in a Marist or DEI utopia that they believe is how society should be ordered.

So maybe fundementally it is a spiritual battle, a ideological one and a moral one regardless of the identities.
Sure, we're living in testing times but I think we all know the jury is still out as to exactly what this means in exacting Eschatological terms.
Doyou think that its now come down to a fundemnetal Eschatological battle regadless of the identity group pushing their beliefs. It seems its come down to a life or death matter, far more meaning than just economically or politically. It seems fundementally its about the very nation of who we are and what reality represents.
Moreover, it's not as if the world has suddenly become a testing place for Christians. It was and has been this way well before 9/11, whether people have realized it or not. It's just that now, there are some additional anti-Christian elements in the world that have manifested, further complicating the political problems we already had, making some folks panicky.
I am not sure about that. I have seen in my lifetime mainstream culture go from the majority to an accepted minority to a rejected minority. We can track the rise of anti Christian attitudes and even persecution within the last 20 odd years. Something is definitely changed which goes beyond the natural evolution of changing attitudes and beliefs.

The level of scrutiny and antagonism is different to how beliefs may come and go. Like the Jews its reserved for special attention beyond the norms and into something more spiritual and deeper. Maybe psychological. But even so its not a normal reaction and one that will itself cause harm.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
7,391
3,721
82
Goldsboro NC
✟247,478.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Ok this sounds a minority. If the Right is not exclusively a Christian party and there theres a Christian spectrum of denominations then this group of 'Dominionists / Theonomists and also Kingdom Now proponents' must be a minority. Aminority taking control of the rest of other Christians who may not take the same approach.

Perhaps thats the problem that its not so much the Christian values or message but that some are trying to apply it in a certain way according to their belief about how Christianity should be applied today.

But this is really the Rights version of Identity politics in this case using religious identity and and belief as the marker as opposed to say DEI ideology that uses race as the marker and deguises their agenda within the nobel cause of protection minorities. Or other ideological groups who may use their beliefs around gender, sex the environment as a nobel cause to push their beliefs.
Not a Christian party officially, there is nothing of the Gospel about it, but a religious party for conservatives. The uniformity consists in pushing Western Christian Culture, like you, not the Gospel.
For example often behind these nobel causes is a Marxist ideology when we peel back the good intentions. Just as these extreme Christian groups want to bring in the Kingdom of God now other groups want to bring in a Marist or DEI utopia that they believe is how society should be ordered.

So maybe fundementally it is a spiritual battle, a ideological one and a moral one regardless of the identities.

Doyou think that its now come down to a fundemnetal Eschatological battle regadless of the identity group pushing their beliefs. It seems its come down to a life or death matter, far more meaning than just economically or politically. It seems fundementally its about the very nation of who we are and what reality represents.

I am not sure about that. I have seen in my lifetime mainstream culture go from the majority to an accepted minority to a rejected minority. We can track the rise of anti Christian attitudes and even persecution within the last 20 odd years. Something is definitely changed which goes beyond the natural evolution of changing attitudes and beliefs.
Persecution of Christians in Australia?
The level of scrutiny and antagonism is different to how beliefs may come and go. Like the Jews its reserved for special attention beyond the norms and into something more spiritual and deeper. Maybe psychological. But even so its not a normal reaction and one that will itself cause harm.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,664
1,661
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟313,429.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Too bad you don't know what they are.
We do thats the point. We knew this ealier in our history with values such as anti slavery, natural inalienable God given Rights and Humans Rights that followed including todays any descrimination laws ect. We know this from the reality of Gods creation and order in the world and how when we change this we invite chaos such as destroying the institution of marriage and family.

They are not just Christian values and truths but nature and reality and something we all know as being created in Gods image.
That is just plain blasphemous and disgusting.
Thank you, I know attacking and descriminating against people because oftheir belief is disgusting. Just like targeting groups based on their race.

Tell me which nation would you rather live in a Muslim one like say Iran or a western nation who at leasts allows the freedoms we know of today. The freedom to criticise ther government and other religions.

A culture can be both bad and good at the same time you know. What your doing is throwing the baby out with the bath water as many ideologues do when they burn their own nations flags and tear down all their history. The west may have brough the best and worst but thats the point, they allowed the best and the worst to happen because they allowed that freedom in the first place.

I would rather live in a nation where I can have the freedom to be a Christian, a Muslim, even a devil worshipper than one that will deny those freedoms like the majority of non western nations.
Prohibition is good example.
Oh ok, I thought it was going to be something like abortion or marriage laws.

Once again you take a simplistic view with limited knowledge of what the lived reality was at those times. Christians didn't just use their beliefs around alcohol to arbitrarily band alcohol like with many social issues.

The prohabition movement began at a time when alcohol was beginning to become commercialised and as a result had a profound effect on society with problems related to alcohol. It was the church who was in the streets having to deal with this problem. So ofcourse they were the ones with the most concern about reducing this problem.

They didn't go for a complete ban but promoted moderation and abstinance at first but this didn't work and the problems go worse. So a growing movement called for complete prhabition as a result. That would seem at least partly a natural reaction to this new problem introduced into society.

You have to remember that the church first lived what they preached. They were the ones who developed social support for problems with alcohol. William Booth started his institute for alcoholics around that time. So it was much morte than just forcing some belief on people and it had a wealth of lived experience behind it that showed it was a problem for society at that time. So there was a rational basis for it.

You also have to remember that this was not really forced but was a majority view. The law was supported for many years. Still today we have many restrictions on alcohol and the evidence from many non Christian experts say that fundementally alcohol and its follow on social acceptance of the abuse of legal and illegal drugs is clearly one of the biggest problems in society today.
A speaker at any university ought to be shut down for speaking slanderous lies.. Even a Christian university should think twice about giving Mike time to a Christian who spews filth like that.
Who says its lies and filth and if its a legitimate different opinion of belief it is should be allowed. We just had heads of universities justifying why anti semetic speech is a right for students to express.

So how is a Christian for example saying that sex is a biological fact slanderous or filth when its actually a scientific fact. If anything its something a university which places importance of facts should support and not the unreal ideologies that cancel this sort of thing. Many of the speakers cancelled are simply expressing truths we all accepted 20 even 10 years ago and dnow its filth.

Besides I though all views and beliefs were suppose to be allowed so long as they are not illegal regardless of whether someone agrees with them or intheir opinion thinks they are filth and slanderous lies.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,664
1,661
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟313,429.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Not a Christian party officially, there is nothing of the Gospel about it, but a religious party for conservatives. The uniformity consists in pushing Western Christian Culture, like you, not the Gospel.
Where have I pushed Western Christian culture above the Gospel. I think your misrepresenting things once again. Don't confuse me saying that the west happens to also uphold some Christians values as promoting western ideas about Christianity over the actual gospel.

The truths and values I have mentioned are universal and western culture happened to be the most aligned with those truths throughout history.

Lets take Christianity out of the west and find all the good things they have brought about compared to other cultures like the end of slavery, womens rights, civil rights, Human Rights, Rule of Law, Democracy and freedoms like the right to hold your own belief and political views. Surely without even using religion we can say these are benefits that the west brought about.
Persecution of Christians in Australia?
Why do you single out Australia. Is that to say because its not as bad in the rest of the world that its not really that bad. But as a native its bad enough. We usually folow other western nations about a few years behind. But its actually happening quicker now as the world becomes smaller.

There is definietly a move away from Christianity compared to the past. At least a third of people have no religion and many others may claim Christianity but don't practice it.

But in the media, with the elite, the activists whose voice is most heard and who most influence the narrative Christianity is demonised. We have had a number of high profile Christians in sports, charity work, politics, corporations attacked and cancelled for merely expressing their beliefs. Beliefs that were widely accepted only a decade or two ago.

Victoria – the Anti-Christian State
Despite a history of always promoting and living an “inclusive, diverse, respectful and supportive workplace” Mr Thorburn was forced out of Essendon. “They made it clear,” he said, “that my Christian faith and my association with a church are unacceptable in our culture if you wish to hold a leadership position in society … not tolerated or permitted in the public square.”

Secularism might aim at a religiously neutral public space, but it tends towards a public space actively hostile towards religion in general and Christianity in particular, especially as public discourse and policy-making comes to be possessed by the West’s new dominant ideology: progressivism.
Progressivism seeks to dismantle Christian ethics and beliefs
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

GrowingSmaller

Muslm Humanist
Apr 18, 2010
7,424
346
✟56,999.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
I am interested in this as I was speaking to some friends the other day about how especially in the media, Hollywood, Music and entertainment there seems to be this pagan or even Satanic ritualistism going on. Things like wearing these head dresses with goat horns and other pagan symbols. Its always very provocative and sexual as well. Almost a celebration of our animalistic side.

I think I know what is happening. Just like in the days when people defied God they turned to nature, to animals and nature itself like Stone idols. Now that modern society is rejecting God this same belief is coming back. It may seem natural for people to worship nature as god. But primarily when this happens its not really about gods in nature but the self as god, about worship our naturalistic side.

Also in those times people were made gods when theres no transcendent God. As self is god desires and feelings and self experience becomes godlike in status. Therefore comfort, pleasure and all the good feelings are moral and the aweful feeling ones are sin similar to Hedonism

So are we seeing a repeat of the down fall of society like Sodom and Gormorrah or like with how Empires have fallen where morality breaksdown and where the created is worshipped and not the Creator which undermines Gods natural order into entropy and chaos as has happened before except on a much bigger scale.
I don’t watch the mainstream pop industry, but I’ve seen glimpses.

I think part of the intent maybe to shock and grab attention, part of it maybe ironic subversion of conventional values, and part of it may just be rebellion against religion.

Maybe it depends on context, if people are not satisfied with the choices they have in the shopping aisle of faith then they may rebel or be unhappy - I personally found I never really got into churches, especially protestant ones.
I was attracted to “dark metaphysics” not ethically or ideally but simply as a form of rebellion but when I studied Buddhism for example (and here I think I’ve been influenced by cultural programming / and influences through the media in the 70s and 80s when I grew up like kung fu and punk rock on the screens and radios) I wasn’t triggered in the same way to be rebellious because I took the religion a bit more seriously. Also when I finally went to a Catholic Church even though I’m not Catholic now I saw some beauty in the and some of the Scriptures seemed wise.


Therefore, I fully get your reference point about Sodom and Gomorrah - whereas in the past I would’ve thought it’s just silly religious nonsense with no realistic relevance to my life.

So I’m introducing an idea of axiomatic networks here, like the belief systems people have and the axioms they use are relative to the individual and subculture . If you talk to a young atheist Liberal about Sodom and Gomorrah then they may just reject what you say as nonsense without considering it seriously therefore you may have to translate the wisdom into secular terms and philosophy terms in order to have them relate to your intention and meaning without the religious, scriptural connotation they automatically reject ?

You might want to translate religious ethics into a form of culture for secular success, and justify religion indirectly.

But with some of these people, they even reject secular success because of the ideologies and stratification in society which they oppose ethically and sometimes with good cause.

The idea is, why would I even want to be too successful in a messed up world which is a bit of a punk attitude? What’s happening with the pop culture? As far as I know is sometimes these impulses and instincts are being exploited by the commercial pop industry and people are being herded into satanic and antisocial behaviour as “artistic and legitimised” forms of rebellion against a society they may not like.

Notice how people with political issues against the mainstream I often targeted by sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll commercialised counterculture rather than anything more politically serious which isn’t really on the airwaves…
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
7,391
3,721
82
Goldsboro NC
✟247,478.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Who says its lies and filth and if its a legitimate different opinion of belief it is should be allowed. We just had heads of universities justifying why anti semetic speech is a right for students to express.

So how is a Christian for example saying that sex is a biological fact slanderous or filth when its actually a scientific fact. If anything its something a university which places importance of facts should support and not the unreal ideologies that cancel this sort of thing. Many of the speakers cancelled are simply expressing truths we all accepted 20 even 10 years ago and dnow its filth.

Besides I though all views and beliefs were suppose to be allowed so long as they are not illegal regardless of whether someone agrees with them or intheir opinion thinks they are filth and slanderous lies.
Here is the text I was referring to. Do you want to go over it point by point?

"Evenso if this is the case the point is that the Left have reacted in kind with their own extreme and enforced ideology. That is what usually happens with identity politics. One side goes to the extreme and the other reactes with an equal and opposite extreme.

All I know is that today with the rise of PC, Cancel Culture and Woke identity politics this has primarily been introduced by Leftist governments throughout the world because they are the ones in power at the moment. Its no coincident that all the radical groups we see today such as Extinction Rebellion, BLM, ANTIFA, Trans Activist, Anti Semetism, University activist groups, all have Leftist beliefs.

All I know is that its the Right, Conservative and Christian views that are being cancelled. A speaker at any university who may dare to speak about the reality of biological sex, that DEI is a descriminating ideology, that open borders in unreal will be shut down. All I know is that opinion polls and surveys show that a growing number of people are fearful of expressing the beliefs and views against what the Left push. Thats the reality."
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Round and round we'll go!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,218
11,278
56
Space Mountain!
✟1,333,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ok this sounds a minority. If the Right is not exclusively a Christian party and there theres a Christian spectrum of denominations then this group of 'Dominionists / Theonomists and also Kingdom Now proponents' must be a minority. Aminority taking control of the rest of other Christians who may not take the same approach.

Perhaps thats the problem that its not so much the Christian values or message but that some are trying to apply it in a certain way according to their belief about how Christianity should be applied today.

But this is really the Rights version of Identity politics in this case using religious identity and and belief as the marker as opposed to say DEI ideology that uses race as the marker and deguises their agenda within the nobel cause of protection minorities. Or other ideological groups who may use their beliefs around gender, sex the environment as a nobel cause to push their beliefs.

For example often behind these nobel causes is a Marxist ideology when we peel back the good intentions. Just as these extreme Christian groups want to bring in the Kingdom of God now other groups want to bring in a Marist or DEI utopia that they believe is how society should be ordered.

So maybe fundementally it is a spiritual battle, a ideological one and a moral one regardless of the identities.
Of course we're in a "spiritual battle." Everyone of us who has read the New Testament understands the essential concept.
Doyou think that its now come down to a fundemnetal Eschatological battle regadless of the identity group pushing their beliefs. It seems its come down to a life or death matter, far more meaning than just economically or politically. It seems fundementally its about the very nation of who we are and what reality represents.
No, it's not an eschatological battle today anymore than it was yesterday, or last century, or in the 4th century or in the 1st century. Somehow, though, the idea of identity in Christ has become entangled with identity with, or within, a nation or culture.
I am not sure about that. I have seen in my lifetime mainstream culture go from the majority to an accepted minority to a rejected minority. We can track the rise of anti Christian attitudes and even persecution within the last 20 odd years. Something is definitely changed which goes beyond the natural evolution of changing attitudes and beliefs.
From my view, the "mainstream culture" in the West has been changing in various ways for much longer than merely the last 20 years.
The level of scrutiny and antagonism is different to how beliefs may come and go. Like the Jews its reserved for special attention beyond the norms and into something more spiritual and deeper. Maybe psychological. But even so its not a normal reaction and one that will itself cause harm.

On a more immediate level that involves all of us who live today and have been alive for the last 20 years, I'd say that what we're seeing currently in Western culture is the ongoing psycho-social and existential fallout over Human Rights abuses of all kinds in the larger world brought about by both World Wars 1 and 2, and the Holocaust. And of course, the advent of technological advancements and modern commerce we've seen during just the past 100 years has made the gripes about those abuses quicker and more efficient to communicate, and hence, we increasingly see more and more calls for liberation and the legal recognition of rights.

Think of it as a kind of domino effect; and in the middle of that ongoing effect, Christianity as a whole has been given a big ugly black-eye.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,986
15,836
55
USA
✟399,500.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Far be it for me to interrupt when you volunteered to take blows from steve's verbosity...
Of course we're in a "spiritual battle." Everyone of us who has read the New Testament understands the essential concept.
Maybe its because I never read the NT (I've had most of it read *to* me over the years), but "spiritual battle" is an alien concept to me. It makes no sense and does not comport with any Christianity familiar to my experience. (Struggle against sin, sure, but "spiritual battle" sounds like the tag line to a bad movie about exhorcists.)
No, it's not an eschatological battle today anymore than it was yesterday, or last century, or in the 4th century or in the 1st century. Somehow, though, the idea of identity in Christ has become entangled with identity with, or within, a nation or culture.

From my view, the "mainstream culture" in the West has been changing in various ways for much longer than merely the last 20 years.
Indeed. The only major change to mainstream culture I've seen in the last 20 years or so is the widespread adoption of smart phones and the changes of behavior induced by them. That is worldwide, and not limited to "The West".
On a more immediate level that involves all of us who live today and have been alive for the last 20 years, I'd say that what we're seeing currently in Western culture is the ongoing psycho-social and existential fallout over Human Rights abuses of all kinds in the larger world brought about by both World Wars 1 and 2, and the Holocaust.
Really, WW 1 & 2? My parents grew up in the immediate aftermath of WW2. That was a long time ago. What "existential" or "psycho-social" fall out are we feeling 80-100 years later?
And of course, the advent of technological advancements and modern commerce we've seen during just the past 100 years has made the gripes about those abuses quicker and more efficient to communicate, and hence, we increasingly see more and more calls for liberation and the legal recognition of rights.
And interest in far-off abuses drops almost as quickly.
Think of it as a kind of domino effect; and in the middle of that ongoing effect, Christianity as a whole has been given a big ugly black-eye.
Largely from punching itself in the face.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
7,391
3,721
82
Goldsboro NC
✟247,478.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Far be it for me to interrupt when you volunteered to take blows from steve's verbosity...

Maybe its because I never read the NT (I've had most of it read *to* me over the years), but "spiritual battle" is an alien concept to me. It makes no sense and does not comport with any Christianity familiar to my experience. (Struggle against sin, sure, but "spiritual battle" sounds like the tag line to a bad movie about exhorcists.)

Indeed. The only major change to mainstream culture I've seen in the last 20 years or so is the widespread adoption of smart phones and the changes of behavior induced by them. That is worldwide, and not limited to "The West".

Really, WW 1 & 2? My parents grew up in the immediate aftermath of WW2. That was a long time ago. What "existential" or "psycho-social" fall out are we feeling 80-100 years later?
I grew up in the aftermath of WWII. It ushered in a period of unprecedented material prosperity and world domination for the United States.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Round and round we'll go!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,218
11,278
56
Space Mountain!
✟1,333,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Far be it for me to interrupt when you volunteered to take blows from steve's verbosity...

Maybe its because I never read the NT (I've had most of it read *to* me over the years), but "spiritual battle" is an alien concept to me. It makes no sense and does not comport with any Christianity familiar to my experience. (Struggle against sin, sure, but "spiritual battle" sounds like the tag line to a bad movie about exhorcists.)
True, the concept itself is open to a large amount of speculation among Christians, but for the most part its a meme that has been used as an allusion to certain things we find in the New Testament. And in this case of my own reference to it, I only intend to mean what Paul the Apostle meant by it.

Anyway, I won't elaborate further about since I know it's not something you're concerned about really.
Indeed. The only major change to mainstream culture I've seen in the last 20 years or so is the widespread adoption of smart phones and the changes of behavior induced by them. That is worldwide, and not limited to "The West".
Right, which is why in my last few posts in talking to Steve, I stated that I think what Christians perceive to be "battling" today has a long history of development. It's not a recent thing but the accumulation of many changes going back multiple centuries.
Really, WW 1 & 2? My parents grew up in the immediate aftermath of WW2. That was a long time ago. What "existential" or "psycho-social" fall out are we feeling 80-100 years later?
It's a known social fact that the destruction seen and experienced during both world wars brought about a disinclination among Europeans and Jews to believe in God.
And interest in far-off abuses drops almost as quickly.
Oh, I don't know about that. There's a small but growing bad of atheists who insist that trauma caused by having been exposed to Christian Doctrine (such as 'hell') has affected their personal sanity.
Largely from punching itself in the face.

I don't know that punching itself in the face is an appropriate anthropomorphism that really explains the lack of thought that some people bring to their engagement with Christianity. And the 'black-eye' descriptor I was using was meant to convey for the idea that scientific advances, critical studies and ideological movements have all provided elements of the ongoing trend to hold the Bible as being utterly passé.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,986
15,836
55
USA
✟399,500.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I grew up in the aftermath of WWII. It ushered in a period of unprecedented material prosperity and world domination for the United States.
Sounds like the source of existential crisis...
 
Upvote 0