Remember the "Russian collusion" investigation? LOL.
Anyone with eyes can see what's going on here.
the one that trump admitted too, but the excuse was, they didn't get anything from them, not that it didn't happen?
Upvote
0
Remember the "Russian collusion" investigation? LOL.
Anyone with eyes can see what's going on here.
It's a common tactic for people to parrot back someone else's points (Biden denentia accusations) when they run out of original content of their own.
Maybe this is a sign that the witch hunt is almost over. Fatigue is setting in.
What are you talking about?
Yeah, that was Don Jr. who arranged the meeting that Kushner also attended. Don Sr. lied about the purpose of the meeting to cover up his son's misstep.He admitted to trying to buy dirt from the russians on hilary, though to be fair I think it was his son who brokered it, but the excuse was they didn't get anything.
Is opposition research illegal?He admitted to trying to buy dirt from the russians on hilary, though to be fair I think it was his son who brokered it, but the excuse was they didn't get anything.
For example, accusations that someone is hiding something they didn't take a medically unnecessary test.The “He must be guilty of something “ fallacy?
No, generally not, but if you go about it the wrong way, it can be.Is opposition research illegal?
I don't recall that she arranged secret meetings with someone touted as being connected with the Russian government and then lying to the FBI about it. There are legal bounds to these things - or there is supposed to be.I mean Hillary paid for a dossier with information that came from Russia
She just paid for someone else to do it then tried to conceal the fact by funneling the money through a law firmNo, generally not, but if you go about it the wrong way, it can be.
I don't recall that she arranged secret meetings with someone touted as being connected with the Russian government and then lying to the FBI about it. There are legal bounds to these things - or there is supposed to be.
What nonsense. Every campaign has opposition research, - you already know, if you have not forgotten, that the Steele dossier started life as a Republican project that the Democrats took over after Donald got the GOP nod.She just paid for someone else to do it then tried to conceal the fact by funneling the money through a law firm
What nonsense. Every campaign has opposition research, - you already know, if you have not forgotten, that the Steele dossier started life as a Republican project that the Democrats took over after Donald got the GOP nod.
It never ceases to amaze me how a simple typo can repeated so often some think it proves a disturbing point. That is really drinking the covfefe!This is sometimes called "drinking the covfefe".
How do you feel about Hillary paying $12,000,000 for dirt on Trump?He admitted to trying to buy dirt from the russians on hilary, though to be fair I think it was his son who brokered it, but the excuse was they didn't get anything.
Typo?!? How dare you accuse Donald Trump of a typo?It never ceases to amaze me how a simple typo can repeated so often some think it proves a disturbing point.
Typo?!? How dare you accuse Donald Trump of a typo?
Covfefe
Trump never acknowledged that the tweet contained a mistyping. He instead tweeted again at 06:09 after deleting the original tweet: "Who can figure out the true meaning of 'covfefe' ??? Enjoy!"[13] White House press secretary Sean Spicer implied later that day that the tweet was not a typo but rather intentional: "I think the president and a small group of people know exactly what he meant."
It is absolutely not disturbing that President Trump tweeted a mysterious secret message to a select cabal, according to the White House.
No, but I believe it is disturbing that the White House issued such a blatant lie, solely to protect Donald Trump's image from the possibility of Trump having mistyped.And I have no doubt you believe it to be true -
I'm sorry if that's disturbing, but at the same time, it's disturbing to others as to why the misspelled word was sensationalized to begin with. Perhaps there needs to be a full-scale investigation by the Federal government, as to why Trump misspelled the word coffee on Twitter. Was it Code meant for the Russians? Perhaps it was code for the "Insurrectionists"?No, but I believe it is disturbing that the White House issued such a blatant lie, solely to protect Donald Trump's image from the possibility of Trump having mistyped.
Just as disturbing as someone asserting in this thread that "Biden is Obama", solely to protect Donald Trump's image from the possibility of Trump having misspoken.
I don't know what's more worrying... The 'deer in the headlights' look that Biden has or the mumbling. Regardless, there's really no comparison, and trying to push these observations of Biden off onto Trump is politically motivated.It goes beyond verbal and written flubs. Overall Biden appears progressively confused and infirmed. Whereas Trump appears robust.