the myth of flat earth debunked again

[Apple Sky]

Why did the world leaders meet in Antarctica plus Buzz Aldrin ?

I will say this , there are questions I have that as yet go unanswered & there is undeniable strange things going on at that part of the world .

 

[Apple Sky]

I notice you left off the trip which invites you to cross the Arctic circle on foot.

I doubt that anyone would want to go if it's on foot.

 

[Strong in Him]

I notice you left off the trip which invites you to cross the Arctic circle on foot.

WWF Journey to the Circle and Giants of Antarctica (Ocean Endeavour) | Intrepid Travel

Cross the Antarctic Circle with World Wildlife Fund Australia (WWF-Australia) whale scientists on a 14-day expedition to Antarctica.

www.intrepidtravel.com

 

[Strong in Him]

Why did the world leaders meet in Antarctica plus Buzz Aldrin ?

So you admit now that some people met there?
I thought it was supposed to be heavily guarded? Did the leaders gang up and fight off the army?

 

[Apple Sky]

So you admit now that some people met there?
I thought it was supposed to be heavily guarded? Did the leaders gang up and fight off the army?

Don't be silly - These leaders are the ones who give the orders for the military to be there in the first place.

 

[Strong in Him]

Don't be silly - These leaders are the ones who give the orders for the military to be there in the first place.

Like you say -

 

[MForbes]

Like you say -

I see what you did there - but she won't.

 

[prodromos]

We can see the lines in the parking lot, (by the way this in not even full zoom)

It looks to be full optical zoom

we can see the light poles and their shadows,
we can see cars, we can see trash cans. A flag pole with flag would be similar to the light poles, we would definitely see it!

If we can get these kinds of clear images of the earth from a satellite, why not the moon?
Something orbiting the moon, should be able to get the same kind of images.

There are a couple of reasons:

• Economics - Airbus profit from selling high resolution satellite images because such images have many applications. There is zero economic incentive for such images of the moon's surface.
• Transmission - high resolution images result in huge amounts of data. Low earth orbit satellites are able to transmit at high speeds because they are not far from the earth's surface. Lunar orbiters have to transmit data over orders of magnitude greater distances which limits the speed at which they can send data which again limits the resolution of images they can send.

No one is going to spend millions of dollars just to satisfy the demands of a tiny group of crackpots, especially when those crackpots will simply reject the images as CGI. You demand proof but dismiss it out of hand when it is given to you. Existing images show the lunar landers, moon buggy and tracks left by the astronauts which is evidence enough, but since you reject that, it is obvious that you would reject a high resolution image of the flag.

 

[prodromos]

Operation Dominic 1960's

Not Antarctica

Operation Deep Freeze 2012
www . nationalguard.mil/News/Article/574921/multi-force-operation-deep-freeze-underway-in-antarctica/

"This support is provided by the Joint Task Force-Support Forces Antarctica, led by Pacific Air Forces at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. JTF-SFA coordinates strategic inter-theater airlift, tactical deep field support, aeromedical evacuation support, search and rescue response, sealift, seaport access, bulk fuel supply, port cargo handling and transportation requirements."

There are no military bases in Antarctica.

 

[Apple Sky]

Operation Dominic 1960's
Operation Deep Freeze 2012

Or 'Operation Highjump', this was an interesting one.

Byrd's fourth expedition, called “Operation Highjump,” in the summer of 1946–47, was the most massive sea and air operation theretofore attempted in Antarctica. It involved 13 ships, including two seaplane tenders and an aircraft carrier, and a total of 25 airplanes.

 

[MForbes]

No one is going to spend millions of dollars just to satisfy the demands of a tiny group of crackpots, especially when those crackpots will simply reject the images as CGI. You demand proof but dismiss it out of hand when it is given to you. Existing images show the lunar landers, moon buggy and tracks left by the astronauts which is evidence enough, but since you reject that, it is obvious that you would reject a high resolution image of the flag.

Spot on.

 

[Apple Sky]

Why is Antarctica protected by military?
The restrictions that apply to Antarctica are generally in place to protect the environment and the biodiversity of the Continent. Lol'z

Why is Antarctica guarded by the military.?

Answer (1 of 11): Look at the amount of misinformation here. So 30 countries have militaries there. It’s blocked out on Google Maps. Planes cannot fly over it. Strange things have been identified like cave openings. Seeming relics. Russian scientists claiming fk have encountered mysterious creatu...

www.quora.com

Ha ha - More likely to stop anyone exploring any further.

 

[MForbes]

Why is Antarctica protected by military?
The restrictions that apply to Antarctica are generally in place to protect the environment and the biodiversity of the Continent. Lol'z

Why is Antarctica guarded by the military.?

Answer (1 of 11): Look at the amount of misinformation here. So 30 countries have militaries there. It’s blocked out on Google Maps. Planes cannot fly over it. Strange things have been identified like cave openings. Seeming relics. Russian scientists claiming fk have encountered mysterious creatu...

www.quora.com

Ha ha - More likely to stop anyone exploring any further.

You should be careful of the links you post. If you scroll further down, you'll see that many folks debunked that post as a bunch of bullcrap. You have a serious case of cranial rectumitis, lady.

 

[prodromos]

Nope, you can use any flight website you like, any one, choose to go from Santiago to Johannesburg and those are the routes you will see.

Not in dispute

It's interesting, to your photo and initial reply regarding the flight routes,
I responded by going to a flight booking website and getting actual real routes that can be purchased.
All I did is enter in that I want to go from Santiago to Johannesburg. Do you get that?
But your "confident" !? Then why not just go on some airline websites yourself, and see for yourself dear one.
I am not talking off the top of my head, or based on "confidence" but rather on real evidence and facts.

You didn't provide a link to your search results so I can't confirm, but since you were the one who looked it up, was the flight via Sydney with Qantas or not?

My clear argument was and is that you will not find any non stop flight from Santiago to Johannesburg,
dear one, go ahead and see for yourself, choose any airline you want.

And dear one, to prove me wrong all you have to do is find 1 non stop flight from Santiago to Johannesburg.

Prove you wrong about what? All you are doing is arguing against a strawman. No one has argued that there should be non-stop flights between Santiago and Johannesburg or that the existence of such flights would prove a globe. That has already been proven with non-stop flights between Sydney and Johannesburg or Sydney and Santiago.

If you refuse to do that, recognize that you choose to bury your head in the sand,
but confidence is not something you sincerely have, or else you would have already responded showing
a non stop flight from Santiago to Johannesburg.

You are the only one burying their head in the sand. You mention direct flights between Sydney and Santiago or Sydney and Johannesburg but refuse to acknowledge that those flights are devastating to your argument. It doesn't make you look too bright.

 

[Apple Sky]

You should be careful of the links you post. If you scroll further down, you'll see that many folks debunked that post as a bunch of bullcrap. You have a serious case of cranial rectumitis, lady.

So what -

 

[MForbes]

So what -

Your ignorance overwhelms even ignorant people.

 

[prodromos]

Or 'Operation Highjump', this was an interesting one.

Byrd's fourth expedition, called “Operation Highjump,” in the summer of 1946–47, was the most massive sea and air operation theretofore attempted in Antarctica. It involved 13 ships, including two seaplane tenders and an aircraft carrier, and a total of 25 airplanes.

Long before the Antarctica treaty.

 

[Apple Sky]

Long before the Antarctica treaty.

Yes, it was after Byrd's interview on TV, that they decided to draw up the Antarctic treaty.

 

[Dan1988]

Starting at 1:05 in that video:
" I can not prove to you that the images and video from space are real and you can't prove that they are fake "

Yes, we can prove they are fake:

Nasa completely busted (has some bad language)
www . bit chute.com/video/fScNoJfvd3SO/

Bubbles in space?
www . bit chute.com/video/Y59CSrx2PHCM/

Astronauts gone wild 2004 Bart Sebril
www . bit chute.com/video/aPiFiIVCy7au/

Bart shows video footage of them faking being half way to the moon, shows the footage to the astronauts themselves,
their reactions are tell tale.


Astro-not with a snake hanging from his neck does a "magic trick" in space,
and other problems during zero-g:

www . bit chute.com/video/pMTQaLnKBBIg/

That's a great recent video, exposing that they use parabolic dives to fake zero-g.
They also use harnesses and cgi.
Some of the simplest hollywood tricks are also used, like sticking stuff to glass and moving that glass before the camera
to make it look like objects are floating.

If we are looking on bit chute, the flat earth truth dominates, as is evident by the likes the video you referenced got
verses the likes received by these videos.

There is no evidence to support the FE theory, but there is tons of overwhelming evidence for a globe earth spinning in space.

99.9% of the 8 billion people on the globe reject the FE theory as rubbish. I mean talk about being laughed out of court.

All of the worlds greatest minds laugh at FE's, have you seen how uneducated ignorant those who push the false FE theory are. Not a single intelligent person in the whole society. There's a wise old saying, it goes "if a wise man doesn't know something, he listens to the experts" I would rather stick with the worlds most intelligent people than accept advice from uneducated, deluded self proclaimed experts.

I can't believe people still believe the lie in 2024, even though we have photos and live videos of our globe earth. How delusional does a person need to be to deny what his eyes see.

 

[Apple Sky]

There is no evidence to support the FE theory, but there is tons of overwhelming evidence for a globe earth spinning in space.

This is just the way they planned it to be.