Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Perhaps. But any mate, male or female may match up without ever knowing what love actually is. What we really seek is a reliable best friend once all the hormones have settled.
Meaning celibate?
Would she be expected to reveal her old life in church?I'd go so far as to make sure she's well regarded in her church and be certain her friends are from her new life, not her old one.
Unfortunately they can check off all these boxes and still be UnGodly the way they treat men they are in relationships with. Unfortunately you gotta always be on the look out and not be impressed with their works.Celibate yes, but not celibate only. Living the Christian life.
Attending a good church, working in a morally upright field for her employment, doing various charities or whatever with church outreach...
I'd go so far as to make sure she's well regarded in her church and be certain her friends are from her new life, not her old one.
But yes, living the Christian life in general.
Would she be expected to reveal her old life in church?
Cannot a person change without living a life of prejudice and persecution at the hands of busybodies. There is a saying, What you don't know, can't hurt you. That might apply to new people in your life. That can also mean what others don't know can't hurt you... and increase your chances of escaping a past.I don't think that's necessary...
I'm trying to stay on topic, but this marriage thing is a huge deal in life for a man. (used to be anyway). and there are delicate considerations to be ironed out or else the marriage would probably be doomed to failure. So I dont think they're really tangents.
"Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new"I don't think that's necessary... But she would have to, to her pastor and any prospective suitors she was serious about considering.
This is a very strong reaction to being invited (voluntarily; nobody is forcing you to participate in the thread) to consider your own attitudes and motivations. Why lash out at hypothetical women like this?Can't women be expected to suck it up when they get said no too? What does think when she hears no? Oh no that is offensive to me because everybody should want me.....That's weird.
Context I find is quickly forgotten here. Assessing whether or not someone is a good fit for you isn't assessing their worth as a person necessarily. But a bad fit for you is of low worth as a partner to you. It's not a statement of the person's worth as a person or as a Christian or as a member of the fellowship. Worth as a partner is different from those, and worth as a partner to you is going to be determined by you and possibly some other wise people. Hence, you can welcome anyone into the church, but you are not obligated to date every unmarried person of appropriate age in the church who might be interested in you.For what it's worth - as someone who's brought her own complicated history and trauma into a marriage - I think it's fair enough to say that a history can bring challenges, and to ask yourself if you personally feel well equipped to deal with those challenges. The answer may be no.
I think it's more problematic to frame the question in terms of the worth or value of a prospective partner. There's a vein of contempt that runs through these discussions which is really quite disturbing.
I will welcome anyone into the church. However, I will not date just anyone who is in the church. I have no obligation to. It's one thing to encourage someone in a Bible study or to serve alongside them on a Saturday morning. It's another to date the person, and yet another to be married to the person, with all that entails.I am telling you this with love: If Jesus is able to not only forgive your mistakes, but welcome you into his ministry to serve him despite your mistakes, then you should try to do the same to others. After all, we are called to follow Jesus and be like him. I am telling you this from the perspective of a woman who thinks sexual shame is heavily placed upon us as a gender, and it shouldn't be. Being a stripper isn't any worse than being a liar, a thief, a smoker or a selfish person
I don't know why the woman's perspective needs to be considered any more than my perspective would need to be considered by a woman I would want to date. If I ask her out and she says no because she doesn't like me for whatever reason, did she consider my perspective? Should she have? People like what they like, and they don't like what they don't.I respect your opinion, but I feel like you're just talking about yourself, what you seek in a partner without taking into consideration the woman's perspective?
However, the point of this thread was (and still is): Is it "ok" for a Christian man to marry a Christian woman who has a questionable past?
This is a very strong reaction to being invited (voluntarily; nobody is forcing you to participate in the thread) to consider your own attitudes and motivations. Why lash out at hypothetical women like this?