New bank subpoena shows Hunter received money from Beijing during Joe's campaign

[JustOneWay]

I believe that Hunter Biden's only qualification to receive millions of dollars from foreign investors and possibly also foreign governments is the fact that he is Joe Biden's son.

Understood. Just like Ivanka and Jarad received two billion dollars because of the donald.

The relevant question would be is this illegal?

 

[Say it aint so]

Today at the hearing where the GOP's witnesses are undermining the GOP's claims, this:

​

"Democrats have twice made a motion to call former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and his associate Lev Parnas to testify before the House Oversight Committee's impeachment hearings.​

​

Republicans have twice voted this motion down." ​

LOL, that says it all.

 

[KCfromNC]

There's a massive amount of evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden. I know the Democrat lines, for the border it is the border is closed, the border is safe, the border is secure. For financial wrongdoing by Joe it is that there is "no evidence." The Bidens should not be able to invoke privilege, when Joe is president and when it is directed by Joe or other high officials working for Joe those individuals need to be held accountable. They are using taxpayer resources for their own political gain. Lori Loughlin used her own money, using taxpayer money is certainly worse, Lori did two months in prison. But this appears to be much more than that, we have sworn testimony that Joe took a bribe of five million. And there are what, ten Bidens identified as having received money from foreign companies and it appears a number of them did nothing to earn the money. Joe is suspiciously absent from the group, but we have a statement from Hunter on his laptop that "half" went to Joe. There is direct evidence of Joe influencing the firing of a prosecutor. Every time the investigation pointed to Joe it was stopped. So now we are properly at an impeachment inquiry.

This is for sure a whole lot of words to avoid mentioning a single bit of the alleged "massive amount of evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden".

It's becoming pretty clear why that sort of approach is used. The only real question I have is if the marks know it and are repeating it or just haven't figured it out yet.

 

[Valletta]

They are flinging everything they can, but nothing is sticking.

As I said, they impeachment investigation is just starting. With Joe claiming executive privilege it was necessary to take this step in order to obtain important records.

 

[KCfromNC]

I believe that Hunter Biden's only qualification to receive millions of dollars from foreign investors and possibly also foreign governments is the fact that he is Joe Biden's son.

Ignoring the fact the guy has an Ivy League law degree, of course.

 

[Pommer]

I believe that Hunter Biden's only qualification to receive millions of dollars from foreign investors and possibly also foreign governments is the fact that he is Joe Biden's son.

In 2019?
When Joe Biden was a private citizen and not in office?
Sure. Whatever you say.

 

[JustOneWay]

As I said, they impeachment investigation is just starting. With Joe claiming executive privilege it was necessary to take this step in order to obtain important records.

What important records?

 

[Valletta]

In 2019?
When Joe Biden was a private citizen and not in office?
Sure. Whatever you say.

The Bidens were pulling in big money when Joe was vice president. The people need to know Joe's role:

"The Biden Administration — including top officials at the Justice Department — lied to the American public and engaged in a cover-up that interfered with federal investigators and protected the Biden family, including President Biden himself," the committee said.

DOJ ordered Hunter Biden investigators to 'remove any reference' to Joe Biden in FARA probe warrant: House GOP

The House Ways & Means Committee released whistleblower documents Wednesday that Republicans say show a “clearer connection" between President Biden and Hunter Biden businesses.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Vambram]

In 2019?
When Joe Biden was a private citizen and not in office?
Sure. Whatever you say.

I believe that the evidence, when it's properly presented, will become very clear to you that Hunter Biden has been accepting millions of dollars from foreign businesses and probably even companies representing foreign governments for well over 10 years.

 

[Vambram]

Ignoring the fact the guy has an Ivy League law degree, of course.

While also being a crack addict?
I am positive that most people with an Ivy League law degree do NOT make millions of dollars a year.

 

[JustOneWay]

I believe that the evidence, when it's properly presented, will become very clear to you that Hunter Biden has been accepting millions of dollars from foreign businesses and probably even companies representing foreign governments for well over 10 years.

So? Why is the Congress investigating a private citizen? This is just wrong.

 

[Vambram]

So? Why is the Congress investigating a private citizen? This is just wrong.

Seriously?
smh

 

[JustOneWay]

I am positive that most people with an Ivy League law degree do NOT make millions of dollars a year.

So? I bet quite a few do....

 

[JustOneWay]

Seriously?
smh

Yes, seriously. Shake your head all you like. Congress has no power to indict or arrest him.

They're SUPPOSED to be working on a budget.

 

[Vambram]

Well, Hunter Biden is not the one who could be impeached.

Let me ask y'all a question, if there's enough evidence linking Joe Biden to a foreign corruption and influence peddling scheme,... would be enough to change y'alls mind about all this?

 

[Vambram]

Yes, seriously. Shake your head all you like. Congress has no power to indict or arrest him.

They're SUPPOSED to be working on a budget.

They are working on a budget which you would know if you had been paying enough attention to the last few weeks up to the present days in Congress.

 

[RestoreTheJoy]

Yeah but what about Trump?

(I just wanted to be the first one in with that argument).

You aren't the first. That was virtually the only thing said by the Democrats who showed up today to the hearing. But Trump!

 

[Vambram]

Understood. Just like Ivanka and Jarad received two billion dollars because of the donald.

The relevant question would be is this illegal?

Ivanka and Jared made their wealth LONG before 2016.

 

[JustOneWay]

You aren't the first. That was virtually the only thing said by the Democrats who showed up today to the hearing. But Trump!

Which is a valid question. Considering all of this is because of trump....what about trump? Don't look now, but trump is going down.

 

[JustOneWay]

Ivanka and Jared made their wealth LONG before 2016.

2 BILLION DOLLARS.

But go ahead, defend them all you like.