Nothing lewd found at Florida drag show, undercover agents confirm.

[rjs330]

Define Groom. Got any examples of Kids that have been Groomed? Who are they? where are they?

Weird you don't feel such a protective streak when it comes to the number one killer of Children.... in that instance your answer is "Let's have MORE of it, Lets Make it EASIER."

The queens have admitted they are grooming the kids. The queen who started it write an entire manifesto on it. There is also this.

Watch: Drag Queen Admits They're 'Grooming' Your Kids During Story Hour

Do you think these events are appropriate for young children?

www.westernjournal.com

And guns? Wrong thread.

 

[rjs330]

I mean, the very people who are sure that their consciousness will survive death and go to heaven for their reward, seem to want that to begin now, on earth, “enemy territory”.
I’m told that Jesus didn’t have an easy time on His mission to save mankind.
Why should our society be ruled by Christianity’s principles?
What makes them better than rules that we all make?
Sure, religion can “have a say” but if it’s overruled, (please, continue the good fight, that’s a good and necessary thing), but the tendency has been to ratchet up the rhetoric and that really needs to end.
Have a fine evening.

That sure doesn't answer how ironic your post is.

And this topic isn't about making people live by Christian principles. This is about children and the harm that has been done to them, which everyone including Christian and non-Christian alike should be concerned about.

And right now it's the left in this country that is doing the forcing people to live by their set of principles.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Actually the idea of a spectrum was brought up by a number of people in this thread from the very first page.

"not found"

 

[Belk]

But who said the doctors and development experts are right in the first place. We know the government fudges the truth with their so callede experts with climate change. We know that the medical experts and doctors have got it wrong in fast tracking gender dysphoric young people to transition and not address the many other issues causing their distress.

What one group thinks lewd another thinks is perfectly fine. Look at the celebration of 11 year old drag queens in the media when there is obviously something very wrong going on as was shown in the case of drag kid Desmiond is amazing being sexualized and made a performance icon for the progressive ideology from a young age.

Jordan peterson interviews trans youth who now regrets transitioning - Google Search

www.google.com

Gender identity clinic accused of fast-tracking young adults

Gender identity clinic accused of fast-tracking young adults

Tavistock Centre launches review amid parents’ fears over pace of transitioning decisions

www.theguardian.com

We know that surveys have shown that 60% of parents of school aged children think Drag Queen story time is innapropriate for children.

Most Parents Oppose ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’

The popularity of “Drag Queen Story Hour” doesn’t include the parents of school-age children, who overwhelmingly oppose the phenomenon in which men dressed as women perform for children.

www.rasmussenreports.com

Seriously? What do all the experts know we should get rid of them since I think they are lying. This is not an argument, it's a demonstration of why we have to be careful of Dunning Kruger.

 

[MotoToTheMax]

then it seems there is no religion that is meant to be affiliated with one or the other political party

Good luck with that.

 

[rjs330]

The meshing of a major political party and it's seemingly corresponding religion seems to have done far more to divide than mere politics itself. Add the inevitable result of for-profit media groups and it should be no surprise we're here.

Are you kidding? People are involved in politics. And part of being a person is about what you believe and stand for. And you have all kinds of people with all kinds of beliefs in politics. You cannot separate someone from their belief system and tell them whatever they believe must be left at the door when you enter the political arena. That's an impossibility. Every democrat and every republican brings a belief system and value system with them. And we could just as easily say that whatever AOC believes has to be left at the door before she goes in.

The meshing of belief systems has always been a part of politics.

And there are religious people in both sides of the aisle. There are a great many left leaning Christians who support the Democrat ideology and use their religion as a reason to support it.

The fabric of our society is coming apart not because of religion. It's happening because the things that used to hold us together are being torn apart and the fabric has been pulled apart into individual threads. Everyone is being broken up into groups. The things that used to hold us together as a society are being torn apart. Religious community, family community, national community. When people feel unmoored from society around them people become isolated from the community it causes great problems. We have seen a huge uptick in suicide and suicidal ideations especially among the younger generations. Even as the left seeks to tear down the societal moorings that used to hold us together. As the left moves to break up the fabric and cause us to become individual threads we wonder why there are so many problems. Social cohesion is critical for a society to be strong and individuals to flourish.

If you are more integrated into a religious community you have far less depression and feelings of being alone. If you are more bonded to your family community you are far less likely to feel alone and individualized. If you are mure integrated into your national political community you are less likely to feel alone and marginalized.

Wow, there is so much more to unpack here I can't do it all in one post.

 

[Pommer]

That sure doesn't answer how ironic your post is.

And this topic isn't about making people live by Christian principles. This is about children and the harm that has been done to them, which everyone including Christian and non-Christian alike should be concerned about.

And right now it's the left in this country that is doing the forcing people to live by their set of principles.

Perhaps you’ve missed my larger point?
I’m saying that the people who do not cotton to your fine religion, to one degree or another, do not believe in an “afterlife”.
Knowing that this life is “all we get” one tends to do the best for the folks that are all already here, now, (without regard to what might happen after we shuffle off of this mortal coil).

 

[rjs330]

I'm not sure how many times I have to say this, but (once again) my claim is that biological sex is not strictly binary.
I'm not claiming it's trinary or quaternary or a rainbow or Belgian.

Well if it's not binary it has to be something. What is it then. I'm mean saying it's not binary but I don't know what it is is not a real answer.

 

[rjs330]

Perhaps you’ve missed my larger point?
I’m saying that the people who do not cotton to your fine religion, to one degree or another, do not believe in an “afterlife”.
Knowing that this life is “all we get” one tends to do the best for the folks that are all already here, now, (without regard to what might happen after we shuffle off of this mortal coil).

Tell me again how this answers your ironic post? You might notice how I haven't even used a religious argument. The entire transgenderism issue is not a solely religious issue, unless you want to say transgenderism smacks of religious overtones.

I said your post was ironic. And it certainly was.

Just who is saying you must believe a religious dogma on this? I think cause you are on a religious forum that all arguments must be religiously based. Not true. And transgenderism counter arguments are certainly not religious for the largest part.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Well if it's not binary it has to be something.

Yes, I suppose it does. But what we've established as true is that it's not binary.

 

[rjs330]

Yes, I suppose it does. But what we've established as true is that it's not binary.

Well in you mind maybe but I don't believe we've established any such thing.

I can't seem to find where WE established anything of the sort. The only real true thing that HAS been established thought the centuries is that sex is binary. If you want to come and claim it isn't you are going to have to do much better than simply claim it isn't.

 

[SeventhFisherofMen]

Well in you mind maybe but I don't believe we've established any such thing.

I can't seem to find where WE established anything of the sort. The only real true thing that HAS been established thought the centuries is that sex is binary. If you want to come and claim it isn't you are going to have to do much better than simply claim it isn't.

But WE can say whatever we want because saying it makes it true right? Doesn't just saying what i want to be true make it true? Oh wait

 

[Ana the Ist]

Which part is confusing or concontradictory?

Well for one...claims.

The alphabet people started off by claiming sexual orientation innate, and fixed, and as such...wrong to discriminate against.

This no longer seems to be the claim.

You also have a supposedly unrelated topic of a possibly non-real concept like gender added to the mix. It was insisted that it was separate from biological sex.

Now biological sex is claimed to be along a spectrum much like gender....and it clearly isn't.

Then when you consider the outrage at those Christian "conversion camps" that attempted to instill heterosexual tendencies.....

And compare them to the insistence that we basically teach children to explore different sexual identities....especially non-hetero ones...as early as possible....

It sounds like the entire group should either start dropping letters and making their own claims or we should dismiss their claims outright.

I mean, that's just a few contradictions. I don't want to write out every one I can think of. I'd be surprised if you can address any of them.

 

[Pommer]

Well if it's not binary it has to be something. What is it then. I'm mean saying it's not binary but I don't know what it is is not a real answer.

There isn’t a fixed number of genders, because “gender” is an adjective, not a noun.

 

[rjs330]

There isn’t a fixed number of genders, because “gender” is an adjective, not a noun.

We were talking about the sex of a person. Biology. Not as Ana put it, a non-real concept.

 

[Larniavc]

This no longer seems to be the claim.

In what what way is that no longer the claim?

 

[Pommer]

We were talking about the sex of a person. Biology. Not as Ana put it, a non-real concept.

But I am not “a” gender, my gender is part of the core of my being.
It just so happens that the “plumbing” that my body sports is “correct” to my own brain. And I am thankful for that. But the brain determines the gender just as the body determines the sex.
(Please, I do understand your position that the body determines the sex which determines the gender but this is in error.
Have a Happy Easter.

 

[Ana the Ist]

In what what way is that no longer the claim?

What Is the Sexuality Spectrum

The sexuality spectrum provides a way of defining sexual identity along a range of possibilities rather than selecting between categories. Learn what the sexuality spectrum is, how to use associated vocabulary.

www.webmd.com

If you're not interested in reading....it basically sounds like how they describe gender. As if people are going to bed heterosexual, are bisexual by the evening, and homosexual the next day. Or just start making up words like "demisexual" and pretend you're special.

In fact....not only is sexual orientation an infinite spectrum....and so is gender....but also, so is biological sex.

It's as if that gender stuff you were told to never question was just a trick to see exactly how many people were dumb enough to believe anything at all with the appropriate amount of shaming.

 

[Ana the Ist]

But I am not “a” gender, my gender is part of the core of my being.

In what way?

 

[Innsmuthbride]

"demisexual" simply means that a person takes no interest in having sex with someone unless they have a very strong bond with that individual. It is not weird, or "special" simply put "demisexuals" are LESS prone to one night stands. In short "demisexual" is an orientation NOT a gender.