• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Noah's Flood & the Strait of Hormuz

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,307
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
The bible describes a great flood over the whole of the earth in the time of Noah.
So you problem is not with the Bible. Your problem is with your interpretation or understanding of the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,111
3,171
Oregon
✟922,857.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Archeology is not a theory, it is science.
All you have presented is theory and your own opinion about where Eden is located. That's it.
You also have not presented any archeology towards your belief of Eden's location.
 
Upvote 0

Gene2memE

Newbie
Oct 22, 2013
4,603
7,128
✟329,365.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
According to Ussher's chronology, he estimated that Moses was born in 1592 BC and died at the age of 120 in 1472 BC. What people do not realize is how much the Hebrew people changed the Bible that we have today.

I seen no reason to accept Ussher's chronology as remotely reliable or accurate.

I also see no reason to accept a faith tradition of Mosaic authorship of the Torah. Particularly when there's very good evidence of composite assembly between roughly 450 and 330 BC, with later attribution to Moses, and acknowledgement in Jewish and Christian biblical scholarship of such.

If I was to accept Mosaic authorship and the Ussher chronology, I'd also be forced to adopt a standard of evidence that accepts other fantastical claims and genealogies. Am I also to accept that the Sumerian kingdom lased circa 270,000 years, the Babylonian kingdom lasted 38,000 years or that Emperor Jimmu is a direct descendant of the sun goddess Amatersu?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,341
16,105
55
USA
✟404,999.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
So you problem is not with the Bible. Your problem is with your interpretation or understanding of the Bible.

I'm not quite sure what this is supposed to mean. The bible describes a global flood. (A flood of all the earth) Are you trying to equate the inundation of the Persian Gulf with the flood of Noah, or not?
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,307
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
So, you're a Biblical literalist? And a young earth creationist too?
Yes, bingo, correct. I am YEC, OEC, Theistic Evolutionist and you may as well throw in GAP for good measure. I am all of the above, but it is the most easy to explain dispensations or one day is 1,000 years. A day is literal, yet contains all time, all ages, and all mysteries. The Bible has 70 to 100 layers of meaning.

We need to learn how to read the original bible because a lot of the Bible does not get translated. The translators just did not have that deep of a level of understanding. The translations can be shallow. Science and history can help us to understand a lot of what fails to get translated.

A prime example is Adam and Eve wearing fig leaves. A little research shows that they made clothing from the fiber of the fig tree. The clothing is more like paper and more for decoration. Although it is interesting when they use the term fig leaf religion. God showed them how to use animals for warmer clothing. Down is a good example.

shamed-naked-eden.png

I seen no reason to accept Ussher's chronology as remotely reliable or accurate.
I see no reason to continue this conversation if you do not accept the work Bishop Ussher has done.
 
Upvote 0

Gene2memE

Newbie
Oct 22, 2013
4,603
7,128
✟329,365.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Yes, bingo, correct. I am YEC, OEC, Theistic Evolutionist and you may as well throw in GAP for good measure.

The first three of those are mutually exclusive positions.

I am all of the above, but it is the most easy to explain dispensations or one day is 1,000 years. A day is literal, yet contains all time, all ages, and all mysteries. The Bible has 70 to 100 layers of meaning.

So, as I understand it from these two responses, what you believe has no internal consistency? Nor is any internal consistency required? The Bible can mean whatever you understand it to mean?
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,307
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
The first three of those are mutually exclusive positions.
We know the earth is 4.5 billion years old which makes OEC true. We KNOW that Adam and Eve lived 6,000 years ago in the Garden of Eden, which makes YEC true. The most famous YEC is Bishop Ussher, who says very little about anything that took place before Adam and Eve. His 2,000-page book is a history of the last 6,000 years.

You can not deny Evolution because it stands up in a court of law. Theistic evolution simply acknowledges that God could have used Evolution. It does not endorse any of the many, many theories that are a part of evolution. It simply accepts what the Biology book has to say. What the legal system requires us to teach our High School students .

You have three circles with very little overlap and very little common ground because you are talking about three different things. When my son was in High School he said they wanted to fight over the Biology book. I told him just do his reading and homework and not waste any time on the arguments.
So, as I understand it from these two responses, what you believe has no internal consistency? Nor is any internal consistency required? The Bible can mean whatever you understand it to mean?

Kabbalah and the Hasidic are the same, but different. First of all, no one is qualified to study Kabbalah unless they have been a Christian or a student of the Bible for 40 years. I also believe no one is qualified to be an elder in a church unless they are a mature Christian with at least 40 years of Bible study. The Hasidic do try to explain the oral traditions to young people at the age of 12 or 13. ESP they like to work with girls or women.

There is a LOT I do not agree with or I have my own beliefs. I am simply a gentile that want to learn and study the Hebrew language so I can better understand my Bible. So am not Hasidic nor am I Messianic Christian.
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,307
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
The Bible can mean whatever you understand it to mean?
Everyone has a subjective opinion. Science is objective. So I try to use science to verify my theory and hypothesis. That IS what science is all about. That is how the scientific method works. People are free to argue for or against my hypothesis and I have the freedom to respond or give a rebuttal to their argument.

Over the years new discoveries in Science fall very nicely into supporting my hypothesis. We can look at a very small part of a mosaic or puzzle and easily figure out what we have not seen yet based on what we do know. This is pretty much how prophecy works. I use science, mostly DNA, Archeology, Geology and so on.

In Genesis 3:2 we are told: "And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living."

I believe this means all that have the breath of life in Genesis 2:7.

The Hebrew word for "breath of life" in Genesis 2:7 is "neshamah." In Hebrew, this word can also be translated as "breath," "soul," or "spirit." It is derived from the root word "neshem," which means "to breathe." The concept of neshamah is important in "Jewish" theology and is associated with the idea that God is the source of all life and that our souls are intimately connected to God's divine presence.
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,307
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Are you giving up your quest to prove the bible with science then?
I am giving up your request for me to waste my time when you are not willing to put any effort into coming up with anything valid. My son graduated Magnum Cumulatie in Computer Engineering. They threw half the class out. He does not claim to be smarter, he just claims to work harder. He reminds me of my brother who used to work 12 hours a day when he was in medical school. Even my father worked and studied hard in medical school.

So I am not going to waste my time on people who are not willing to put some effort into learning. I have better things to do with my time. Titus 3:9 "But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless."
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,341
16,105
55
USA
✟404,999.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
We know the earth is 4.5 billion years old which makes OEC true.
No. The measured 4.5 billiion year age of the Earth is what makes OEC necessary as a clean reading of the Genesis creation story and the subsequent chronology implicates a young Earth of 6-10 thousand year age (depending on the details of the chronology). OEC is the first attempt to adapt the traditional (YEC) creation view to objective scientific evidence. In this case, the age of the Earth. I'm not sure how OEC people deal with the chronology since A&E in Eden (which they definitely believe in) as it is not as common as later forms or YEC.

We KNOW that Adam and Eve lived 6,000 years ago in the Garden of Eden, which makes YEC true.
That's literally the thing creationists have to prove. It is the claim. It is also incompatible with OEC. Either the Earth is young (YEC) or old (OEC) it can not be both.
The most famous YEC is Bishop Ussher, who says very little about anything that took place before Adam and Eve. His 2,000-page book is a history of the last 6,000 years.
Not having read it I suspect it was "nothing" given "In the beginning" and all that.
You can not deny Evolution because it stands up in a court of law. Theistic evolution simply acknowledges that God could have used Evolution. It does not endorse any of the many, many theories that are a part of evolution. It simply accepts what the Biology book has to say. What the legal system requires us to teach our High School students .
Evolution stands up in a court of law because it is a science and appropriate for teaching in public schools. Creationism in its various forms (YEC, OEC, Theistic evolutoin, ID) is religion and as with all religious instruction, prohibited in public schools.
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,307
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Either the Earth is young (YEC) or old (OEC) it can not be both.
You are getting your science book mixed up with your history book. We can use science like archeology to verify what we read in our history book is real. For example, Abraham was from the city of UR and they have done excavations of that city. Even one of the oldest books, the Odyssey talks about the city of Troy. Again Archeology has done work on the ancient remains of that city.

In Genesis 11:28, it states, "And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees." Later, in Genesis 15:7, God tells Abraham to leave his home in Ur and go to a new land that God will show him.

We can ask about the DNA of Abraham only DNA is for populations, not individuals. It has been known for over a decade that a majority of men who self report as members of the Jewish priesthood (Cohanim) carry a characteristic Y chromosome haplotype termed the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH). The CMH has since been used to trace putative Jewish ancestral origins of various populations.


gettyimages-122220518-2048x2048.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Larniavc

I’m the best.
Jul 14, 2015
14,453
8,837
52
✟378,231.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
You are getting your science book mixed up with your history book. We can use science like archeology to verify what we read in our history book is real. For example, Abraham was from the city of UR and they have done excavations of that city. Even one of the oldest books, the Odyssey talks about the city of Troy. Again Archeology has done work on the ancient remains of that city.

In Genesis 11:28, it states, "And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees." Later, in Genesis 15:7, God tells Abraham to leave his home in Ur and go to a new land that God will show him.

We can ask about the DNA of Abraham only DNA is for populations, not individuals. It has been known for over a decade that a majority of men who self report as members of the Jewish priesthood (Cohanim) carry a characteristic Y chromosome haplotype termed the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH). The CMH has since been used to trace putative Jewish ancestral origins of various populations.


View attachment 328425
I did Control F on the Wiki page. There was no mention of Abraham.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,341
16,105
55
USA
✟404,999.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
After I noted that it is logically inconsistent to think both YEC and OEC are compatible (they are not), you wrote:
You are getting your science book mixed up with your history book.
Am I? I do know that the bible is neither. I do know the difference
We can use science like archeology to verify what we read in our history book is real.
Archeology can be used to supplement history, but history is the study of the past in the era of written documentation. A good portion of archeology focuses on pre-literate society.
For example, Abraham was from the city of UR and they have done excavations of that city.

Ur was still occupied until around 500 BCE, the rough epoch for the redaction of the Torah books. It is not remarkable that he was from a city that existed (or existed recently) when it was written. Nothing in the city of Ur indicates that Abraham was from there.

Even one of the oldest books, the Odyssey talks about the city of Troy. Again Archeology has done work on the ancient remains of that city.
And what is your point?
In Genesis 11:28, it states, "And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees." Later, in Genesis 15:7, God tells Abraham to leave his home in Ur and go to a new land that God will show him.
Since you are a big fan of Ussher's timeline, at the time he puts Abraham, Chaldea didn't exist yet. Oops.
We can ask about the DNA of Abraham only DNA is for populations, not individuals.
It may come as a shock to you, but I have my own personal, unique, genome. I am not a population.
It has been known for over a decade that a majority of men who self report as members of the Jewish priesthood (Cohanim) carry a characteristic Y chromosome haplotype termed the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH). The CMH has since been used to trace putative Jewish ancestral origins of various populations.
And what does this have to do with the only part of my post you quoted (and really didn't address at all)? Haven't the Jews been free of a priesthood for 1950 years (since the Romans destroyed their temple in 70 CE)?
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,307
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
I do know that the bible is neither.
The Bible is a history book. We use the Scientific method and scientifically gathered evidence to interpret and understand the Bible. Gerald Lawrence Schroeder is an Orthodox Jewish physicist, author, lecturer, and teacher at the College of Jewish Studies Aish HaTorah's Discovery Seminar. This is what he tells us: "At MIT, in the Hayden library, we had about 50,000 books that deal with the development of the universe: cosmology, chemistry, thermodynamics, paleontology, archaeology, the high-energy physics of creation. Up the river at Harvard, at the Weidner library, they probably have 200,000 books on these same topics. The Bible gives us 31 sentences. Don't expect that by a simple reading of those sentences, you'll know every detail that is held within the text. It's obvious that we have to dig deeper to get the information out."

That means between Harvard University and MIT there are 250,000 books that prove the Bible is accurate and true. Even more amazing the Bible condenses those 250,000 books down to 31 sentences. In Genesis Chapter 1, there are 312 unique words in the original Hebrew text that do not repeat themselves. This count includes all the different forms and inflections of each word. Even if you ha ONE book for every word, that would be 312. But we are told that there are AT LEAST 250,000 books to explain those 31 sentences made up of 312 words.

The Hebrew Bible is much deeper than the translation. There is a lot in our Bible that is beyond the ability of the translators to understand, that does NOT get translated into our English Bible. That is why we need to read, study and learn Hebrew so we can go into a deeper understanding of our Bible.

What amazes me is when we have a person with a Ph.D. at even Harvard, Yale, or MIT that I would have trouble putting them in a third-grade Bible study class. We still have to teach them at a first or second-grade level. So even though they can function at a graduate level in Science. With the Bible they have a long way to go.

If they agree or not, just to have an honest understanding of what a religious perspective is. Of course, there are people that are dishonest and just want to lie, cheat and steal. But that is a different story.
 
Upvote 0