Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And now that we've established that life begins after conception, it's just a matter of arguing about how long after.Twinning
"Before about 14 days post-conception, some embryos split into two embryos (identical twins). Therefore, some think, embryos before this point aren't yet individual, unitary human beings.
But the fact than one organism can give rise to two doesn't mean it isn't an individual organism. A flatworm, as Patrick Lee observes, can be cut to produce two separate flatworms, and that doesn't mean a flatworm isn't a flatworm. The evidence of embryology shows that human embryos, likewise, are unitary and individual organisms even if twinning later occurs."
@ChristianForCats
We have a definitive no to the question if this conversation can go on without attacks or other things you don’t want and no sign of that changing, so, what’s the point of the thread continuing?
This is false, because an embryo is not a human being. An acorn is not an oak tree.Both an embryo and a fetus are stages of development of a human being.
I never claimed to have evolved from an embryo.You didn't evolve from an embryo, you once were an embryo.
I never said human life is not valuable. I merely clarified the definition of human being.If you don't think that a human life is valuable that is up to you, but don't be surprised that other people think nobody should willfully end the life of an innocent human being without their consent.
Saying something doesn't make it true.Abortions Murder,
it's HOW GOD views it and he's the Ultimate Authority.
Regardless as to what you choose to be deceived into believing,
it doesn't change the fact that abortions murder.
toss all the secular lies at me you want, you fool only yourself.
in the end.
If GOD declares it to be so than it is,
Abortion is Murder and Murder is SIN.
This is false, because an embryo is not a human being. An acorn is not an oak tree.
View attachment 325732
I understand that you cannot accept the scientific definition of a "human being" because it doesn't fit your opinion, but it's certainly not a dolphin in the woman's womb. It's a human.
If "fully developed" is your requirement for being a human being, then neither a baby nor a teenager are human beings. You are moving on thin ice there.
As the United States National Center for Biotechnology Information points out:
"Embryos are whole human beings, at the early stage of their maturation. The term 'embryo', similar to the terms 'infant' and 'adolescent', refers to a determinate and enduring organism at a particular stage of development."
Embryonic human persons. Talking Point on morality and human embryo research - PMC
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
And now that we've established that life begins after conception, it's just a matter of arguing about how long after.
That still doesn't discount the fact an embryo is a life defined as a human being with individual DNA.Embryos can be frozen for years and then implanted. Human beings cannot survive being frozen for years.
Wrong.This is false, because an embryo is not a human being. An acorn is not an oak tree.
"Even when they do" ... lol yeah right. There wouldn't be "a million unwanted pregnancies" if most people actually chose to use contraception.Even when they do, you still have a million unwanted pregancies in the US every year.
God is not going to treat someone with severe cognitive issues or a new born baby the same as an adult male of sound mind. That would neither be fair or just.In other words, morality is subjective instead of consistent.
English is a clunky language and any good Bible scholar double checks things by looking to the Hebrew or Greek to get a deeper shade of meaning.Sounds to me like you're claiming that English translations can't be trusted.