Clare73
Blood-bought
- Jun 12, 2012
- 29,066
- 7,503
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Who made that rule?Whenever you have to bombard with over 10 Bible verses, it's a clear sign you don't know what you're talking about.
You're kidding, right?
An abundance of evidence is really no evidence at all?
In addition to divine foreknowledge, do you also not understand what absurdity is?
Methinks because the evidence overcomes your objections, and you have no way to unseat it, you create a pathetic absurdity to try to invalidate it.
Translate: The testimony of multiple Scriptures is proof of error, for truth can be testifed to by only one statement.You know you don't have any clear verse to prove your view, so you have to pull out so many verses or some wall of text to make it look like you're right.
Who made that rule?
Where did you learn that Biblical testimony to a doctrine must be limited to one statement?Maybe quote just one verse and then we talk.
Pick one about which you have a question, and we'll look at other Scriptures which corroborate or explain it.
Last edited:
Upvote
0