• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is it okay to simply assume that God saves all?

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
35
Shropshire
✟193,879.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
That's a great point. The image is there, always. It can be a struggle to see it, and that should probably give me more humility due to my failure to see it. What does that say about me? Maybe I don't want to see myself in the other that I despise. I don't know.

Same for me. I also struggle to see me as God sees me. A minister actually told me that a couple of weeks ago. I said I'd try to but, what with one thing and another...

Let the scripture posting begin!

What a shame it's bedtime here in the UK!
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,104
6,137
EST
✟1,121,354.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Is it okay to simply assume that God saves all?
@Hmm
Short answer. No!
Who better than the native Greek speaking scholars who translated the Eastern Greek Orthodox N.T. know the correct translation of the Greek words in the N.T.?
Here is an oft disputed verse, where Jesus mentions "eternal punishment."

EOB Matthew 25:46 Then he will answer them, saying: ‘Amen, I tell you: as much as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’ These [ones on the left] will go away into eternal [aionios] punishment [kolasis], but the righteous into eternal life.”
EOB 1 John 4:18 There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear, because fear is connected with punishment. [kolasis]But the one who fears is not yet perfect in love.
http://fortsmithorthodox.org/NEW TESTAMENT.pdf
The "Hell No" folks argue that "aionios" never means "eternal" and that "kolasis" does not mean "punishment" but really means "correction."
According to the native Greek speaking scholars who translated the EOB "aionios" does mean "eternal" and "kolasis" does mean "punishment."
"Kolasis" only occurs twice in the N.T. the second occurrence is 1 Jn 4:18. Note the one who has "torment"/"kolasis" is not corrected i.e. "not made perfect." Thus it is not "okay to simply assume that God saves all." Hope this helps.



 
  • Like
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In the past, many self-identified Christians used the Bible to justify slavery quoting passages such as Ephesians 6:5-8: “Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ”.
I can imagine them saying that's clearly "what the Bible says", and on plain reading it seems to be, but we don't interpret it that way now and we don't feel the need to defend our interpretation with passages that oppose slavery.
We just feel that it's right to assume that slavery is wrong.
Emphasis on "feel" rather than truth.

Slavery is not preferable, just as poverty, disease and handicap are not preferable, but slavery as God legislated it is not immoral, just as poverty, disease and handicap are not immoral.
This suggests that our sense of right and wrong and of what's reasonable are valid ways to think about God. Which means that, when thinking about Chrisitan universalism, it's okay to ask which view just makes more sense. In general, it's okay to ask "Would the God perfectly portrayed by Jesus in the Gospels really send anyone to an eternal hell of torture/torment?. If He's omnipotent, can He not find a way to draw all people to Himself freely?"

So our starting point when thinking about universalism doesn't have to be "How does this fit into the Bible?" It could instead be "How could God possibly allow any one of His children to be be lost/annihilated/tortured forever".

It's infernalists who try to put the burden of scriptual proof on you. But rather than entering into "sophisticated" exegetical arguments it's okay to start with the assumption that if God exists, He's a God who will one day restore all His creation.

One does not simply go to bed when someone on the Internet is wrong. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So our starting point when thinking about universalism doesn't have to be "How does this fit into the Bible?" It could instead be "How could God possibly allow any one of His children to be be lost/annihilated/tortured forever".
Thanks for this interesting topic.

The question: "How does this fit into the Bible?", has its own assumptions built in. (a loaded question)

A better question may be: "What is God's plan for his creation?", what is God about? Did God create humankind in order to punish them for not being like him? Or is God in the restoration business? The answers seems so obvious.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Thanks for this interesting topic.
The question: "How does this fit into the Bible?", has its own assumptions built in.
(a loaded question)
Loaded only to those who view the Bible as not being able to be correctly understood in terms of itself, requiring the assistance of man's ideas to fit it into the terms of fallen man's "wisdom."
A better question may be: "What is God's plan for his creation?", what is God about? Did God create humankind in order to punish them for not being like him? Or
is God in the restoration business? The answers seems so obvious.
Being obvious and being seen are two different things.
Things may be obvious, but they are not always seen.

And that is: God is in the "preparing a bride for his one and only Son" business, and which involves aspects with which fallen man may not understand nor agree, as in Romans 9.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,802
1,917
✟985,912.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Do you think the verse I quoted "clearly indicates" that slavery is okay?

And if not, why not?
No! Christ did not come to make a heaven on earth. This messed up world is actually the very best place for willing individuals to humbly accept God's help (charity) as charity and thus fulfill their earthly objective.
You can fulfill your earthly objective as a slave, so there is no reason to go after eliminating slavery on this earth, but we are to help others choose to accept God's gifts. Jesus did not spend time and energy trying to do away with slavery, since it does not prevent us in becoming Christians.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,802
1,917
✟985,912.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I guess the question is , who are his children?
1 John 3
Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. 8 He who sins is of the devil, for the devil has sinned from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil. 9 Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.

10 In this the children of God and the children of the devil are manifest: Whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is he who does not love his brother. 11 For this is the message that you heard from the beginning, that we should love one another, 12 not as Cain who was of the wicked one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his works were evil and his brother’s righteous.
Paul in talking to pagans in Athens and says: “We are all God’s off springs”, so in that way we are all God’s children. We are all born innocent (children of God) but as we mature, we all sin and we are slaves and children of who we obey.

Think about the prodigal son, since this is the way, we are treated. Was the young son still the young son of the father when he after he left the father and was involved in big time sinning

With the lost sheep and the lost coin, the owner went looking for them, so why not go after the lost son?

If the young son had not returned but stayed in the pigsty and starved to death (accepting the full punishment he deserved), would that mean the father did not Love him as a son?
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Paul in talking to pagans in Athens and says: “We are all God’s off springs”, so in that way we are all God’s children.
Not quite. . .

For starters, Paul is
1) quoting several Greek poets there--Epimenides, Aratus and Cleanthes,
2) not giving divine truth, and
3) quoting them in the context of demonstrating that as we are not, so God is not, like gold, silver or stone (idols), images made by man's design and skill.
It's not about all mankind being "children" of God. All mankind are creatures of God until they are born again of the Holy Spirit and become children of God by faith in Jesus Christ.
We are all born innocent (children of God)
Not according to NT apostolic teaching:
"The result of one trespass was condemnation for all men." (Romans 5:18)

We are all born condemned (Romans 5:18), and must be reborn (John 3:3-7) to become a son of God. (John 1:12; Matthew 5:9, 44-45; Romans 8:14, 19; Galatians 3:26, 4:5; Ephesians 1:5)
but as we mature, we all sin and we are slaves and children of who we obey.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think that your concept of slavery and the slavery spoken of in the bible are very different. The meaning of a bible verse is based on the meaning that it had in the time and to the people it was originally delivered to.
It's the same meaning in both: ownership of a person by another person, as their personal property.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is a passage telling Christians who where slaves, how to behave towards their owner.
It does not justify owning slaves.
Nothing in the NT attempts to "justify" the OT law of God, including the law legislating slavery.
The bibles attitude towards slavery can br seen in
1 Timothy 1:10
New International Version
10 for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine , and in the OT laws against trding in slaves.
That refers to Exodus 21:16, and in the Greek of 1 Timothy 1:10, it is andrapodistes; i.e., "men stealing," kidnapping, and making into slaves, for which the penalty was death.
It does not refer to the slavery legislated by God in Leviticus 25:39-54.
The problem of universalism, that everybody will be saved is it goes against the whole of the bible.

In the OT compliance with Gods laws was required for his blessings and failure brought punishment.
In the NT it is equally clear that some people will be saved whie others will not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,802
1,917
✟985,912.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Thanks for this interesting topic.

The question: "How does this fit into the Bible?", has its own assumptions built in. (a loaded question)

A better question may be: "What is God's plan for his creation?", what is God about? Did God create humankind in order to punish them for not being like him? Or is God in the restoration business? The answers seems so obvious.
I know this is one of your favorite topics.
Everything needs to start with the objective.

If there is this eternal intelligence it would be at the epitome of the best it could be and not in the process of improvement. It would be the ultimate bad or good but not somewhere in-between. Why be bad when He can be good just as easily? The ultimate “good” would be what is called Godly type Love (to be defined later) and is a totally unselfish type Love. Since this God would be able to direct our thinking, why would He have us think of Him as being totally bad, when He could make us think bad was good and thus, He would be worthy of praise? If God were bad and we praise a “Good God” than we are not praising Him.



The differences and issues begin with misunderstanding of the objective. Most Christians like: Man’s objective is to “bring glory to God” and have scripture references to support that objective, but a person can take any commandment of God given in scripture and have Biblical support for call that command: “Man’s objective”. We are certainly commanded to do that command, so why is it not man’s objective?

There are the two superior commands which all other commands are subordinate to and combined would be like: “Love God (and secondly others) with all your heart, soul, mind, and energy.” That appears to be man’s “Mission Statement”. The huge problem with fulfilling that “Mission Statement” is the fact that the “Love” needed would have to be huge, way beyond anything man could develop, learn, deserve, earn, pay back, be instinctive to man, or somehow just be forced upon humans.

Thus, the reason you have free will, is because it is required for you to complete your earthly objective.

This messed up world which includes satan roaming around is not here for your pleasure, but to help each of us to become like God Himself in that you have the unique, unbelievable Godly type Love (God himself is Love).

There are just somethings even an all-powerful Creator cannot do (there are things impossible to do), like create another Christ, since Christ has always existed, the big impossibility for us is; create humans with instinctive Godly type Love, since Godly type Love is not instinctive. Godly type love has to be the result of a free will decision by the being, to make it the person’s Love apart from God. In other words: If the Love was in a human from the human’s creation it would be a robotic type love and not a Godly type Love. Also, if God “forces” this Love on a person (Kind a like a shotgun wedding) it would not be “loving” on God’s part and the love forced on the person would not be Godly type Love. This Love has to be the result of a free will moral choice with real alternatives (for humans those alternatives include the perceived pleasures of sin for a season.)

Read the story of the Prodigal Son in Luke 15, the young son was generously given more then he could handle (like most of us today), which the father would realize. The prodigal son returned to his father, not out of “Love”, but selfishly wanting a job he did not deserve or should even ask for. Just because the son became just willing to accept pure undeserved charity from the father he hated, allowed the father to shower him with gifts. God is that way with you.

God has created beings to shower them with the greatest gifts possible, the greatest gift being having a Love like His.

If there is this Creator of the universe out there, His “creations” could not really “do” anything for Him, so this Creator would have to be seen as a Giver (Unselfish Lover) and not trying to “get” something from His creation.

Why would God have a totally unselfish type of Love, since He personally would not get anything out of it? If God’s “Love” is some kind of knee jerk reaction, then it is really meaningless (something like; gravity which is nice to have, but everyone automatically has it). God Loves us in spite of what we have done, who we are or what we will do, so it has to be by His choice.

God would create the right universe for the sake of the individuals that will accept His gift (the most powerful force [Love] in all universes, since that force [Love] compels even God to do all He does) and thus the willing become like He is (the greatest gift He could give).

What keeps the all-powerful Creator from just giving whatever He wants to his creation, eliminating the need for free will and this earthly time.

This Love is way beyond anything humans could develop, obtain, learn, earn, pay back or ever deserve, so it must be the result of a gift that is accepted or rejected (a free will choice).

This “Love” is much more than just an emotional feeling; it is God Himself (God is Love). If you see this Love you see God.

All mature adults do stuff that hurts others (this is called sin) these transgressions weigh on them, burden them, to the point the individual seeks relief (at least early on before they allow their hearts to be hardened). Lots of “alternatives” can be tried for relief, but the only true relief comes from God with forgiveness (this forgiveness is pure charity [grace/mercy/Love]). The correct humble acceptance of this Forgiveness (Charity) automatically will result in Love (we are taught by Jesus and our own experience “…he that is forgiven much will Love much…”). Sin is thus made hugely significant, so there will be an unbelievable huge debt to be forgiven of and thus result in an unbelievable huge “Love” (Godly type Love).

Sin has purpose in helping willing humans in fulfilling their objective. God does not like it but allows it.

Unfortunately, I, along with others, needed to see and know the brevity of life in order to respond sooner than later. Time is not on our side, since we do not get better, but worse. If everyone had at least 60 years, there would be no rush to repent and repenting does not get easier with time. We all tend to spiral down into the pigsty of life (like the prodigal son) and that does help, if when we do come to our senses we turn to the Father, but that does not have to take 60 years.

Let me just give you an example of How God works to help willing individuals.

If the nonbeliever had knowledge of God's existence that person would not need faith in God's existence, but faith is needed for humility and humility is needed to humbly accept pure charity and the only way to get Godly type Love is through accepting it as pure charity in the form of forgiveness.

This also shows a “need” for man to sin.

Let’s talk about “Adam and Eve”:

Adam and Eve were made “very good” by God’s standard (as good as made beings could be made, but not perfect like Christ). They had the same “objective” as you and I have, but what we and they found out was: what would be perceived as an ideal place and condition, was actually a lousy place to fulfill man’s objective. Not sinning meant they deserved all that God was giving them (it was His responsibility to care for His creation). There was no reason for Adam and Eve to humbly accept God’s gifts as pure undeserved charity and they had to be given a survival instinct to give value to life, but that creates a self-concern and a kind of selfishness. They were eventually going to sin, have curses to live with, and eventually die. Is death bad in and of itself? Curses limiting resources also provided a way to experience Love through helping others, and now they had a need for undeserving charitable forgiveness.

I am not wanting to go back to the Garden situation even without the tree of knowledge and satan roaming around, since Adam and Eve sinned in that situation. What would a better situation look like?

This messed up world is what I and others need to fulfill our objective, I need: death, Christ to go to the cross, past sins, work to do, purpose for being here, tragedies of all kinds, hell, guidance to know what pleases and displeases God, Christ’s example, the indwelling Holy Spirit and the Church.

People who do not want to be undeservingly Loved in spite of the way they are, but want only a carnal type Love (to be loved for the way people perceive them to be), would not be happy at the Love Feast in heaven since there is only this Godly type Love. Yes, they might be really unhappy in hell, but the choice is not between the lessors of two evils. People go to hell not to help them nor because God does not Love them, but out of God’s Love for those who are helped by the existence of hell and the fact people go there.

We will not sin in heaven, yet we have the free will to do so, why will we not sin? We know about sin since we have sinned, we know about satan since he has tempted us, we know about Love since we used it, we can not see spiritual things so we not only know the Spirit is with us, but can literally see him at our elbow, we will not have sexual bodies, which can cause us to be naturally competitive, we virtually have everything so there is nothing to covet, the only thing we are not all equal with is Godly type Love, but that only means Paul Loves me more then I Love Him back so who is better off in that situation. I do not have scripture to back this up, but as a Christian my greatest joy comes from helping others, so in heaven I would want to protect and preserve all those that come to heaven without ever having the opportunity to fulfill their earthly objective and thus come with only a wonderful child for wonderful parent type love.





That is an introduction to the huge topic of Love.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, eternal punishment can no corrective purpose because there will never be a point at which the correction is made because it simply goes on and on forever.
Some people seem to think that God changes from a forgiving father into a merciless monster at the point of our death if our faith wasn't quite good enough. But obviously God's nature doesn't change like that. He's not a Jekyll and Hyde character, sometimes being merciful and sometimes being just. He's always both at the same time because His mercy is always just and His justice is always merciful.
In addition to being a contradiction of terms (mercy, justice), that is not quite what the Bible presents.

Biblically, his mercy is always according to justice; i.e, his mercy always satisfies justice first.
Jesus had to satisfy (pay the penalty of) God's justice on man's sin so that mercy could be offered by God.
There is no mercy in God's justice which has not been satisfied (penalty paid).
I don't quite see how eternal torture fits into the picture but perhaps someone can send a diagram in or something to show how it does.
Being neither prosecutor, nor jury, nor judge, it is not ours "to see" how God's punishment of anything fits into anyone's picture.
That belongs to the Judge alone.
We don't judge him, he judges us.
We don't call God to the bar of our reason to give an account of his justice.
We must appear before the bar of his divine justice to give an account of our transgression.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,918.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What is justice but flourishing life? Anything short of that and God fails to finish what God set out to do, i.e. create a good creation where life flourishes in the divine presence.
Biblical support for this being what "God set out to do"?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,685.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
What is justice but flourishing life?
I hope you can explain something better here that doesn't include what appears to be a huge eisegetical use of Scripture on your part. I have always considered you a better student than that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

sawdust

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
3,576
600
68
Darwin
✟205,772.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But rather than entering into "sophisticated" exegetical arguments it's okay to start with the assumption that if God exists, He's a God who will one day restore all His creation.

Yes Adam, let's ignore what God says and go along with whatever our heart desires. I mean, what possible harm could come from that? ;) :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,393
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,356.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I know this is one of your favorite topics.
Everything needs to start with the objective.
Your mile-long reply does nothing to address my post.

"Did God create humankind in order to punish them for not being like him?"
"Or is God in the restoration business?"

Saint Steven said:
Thanks for this interesting topic.

The question: "How does this fit into the Bible?", has its own assumptions built in. (a loaded question)

A better question may be: "What is God's plan for his creation?", what is God about? Did God create humankind in order to punish them for not being like him? Or is God in the restoration business? The answers seems so obvious.
 
Upvote 0