• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Did Christ at the cross end all the laws?

Status
Not open for further replies.

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,260
6,249
Montreal, Quebec
✟315,116.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why would Paul quote from the Ten saying it was the law if that wasn't the case.
It is obvious that merely quoting from the 10 does not necessarily mean that the 10 are still in force! How is this not obvious?

Even if Paul praises the 10 - as he does in Romans 7 - this does not mean they are still in force.

I can praise the merits of a law from the past without implying it remains in force.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,826
5,611
USA
✟729,312.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
A gross mischaracterization of my position as any objective reader will know.

Please stop with your repeated false attributions - by now you have to know that my position does not entail commitment to such an absurd position.
You can't have it both ways, this is the law of God that you keep saying is "retired" despite the apostles and Jesus all saying otherwise. I agree it is an absurd position to think the law of God is retired and that we are free to break these laws that God personally wrote for us.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,826
5,611
USA
✟729,312.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It is obvious that merely quoting from the 10 does not necessarily mean that the 10 are still in force! How is this not obvious?

Even if Paul praises the 10 - as he does in Romans 7 - this does not mean they are still in force.

I can praise the merits of a law from the past without implying it remains in force.
Basically what you appear to be saying what the apostles and Jesus was teaching was not meant for our benefit, the scriptures are multiple choice or what we feel like is meant for us.

So Jesus saying if you want to enter into life quoting from the Ten- not enforce. Not really sure with your thinking the point of the scripture if we are not to follow it on God's terms. For me, the scripture reveals the will of God and following His Word is the only safeguard we have to navigate the world we live in, so we can one day live with Jesus forever without sin, the way it was meant. This life is our test and not everyone who says Lord Lord will enter into heaven according to Jesus, but those who do the will of God. Matthew 7:21-23 For this is the love of God that we keep His commandments. 1 John 5:3
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Well... I would say that specifically the old Covenant is the one that God made with the Israelites when he brought them out of Egypt.

In Jeremiah 31 (and Hebrews 8), God says he's going to make a new covenant with the Israelites. It's not like the covenant he made when they came out of Egypt.

So we have two covenants: the new covenant, and the Coming out of Egypt covenant. If one is called 'new" what's a good shorthand for the other one? And I think that's where "old covenant" comes in.

Hundreds of years ago when the Catholic bishops and also the church of England were translating the Bible into English, the word "testament" had an overlapping meaning with the word "covenant".

And Yes it's true that today, we still use Old Testament and New Testament to refer to sections of the Bible.

I see what you're saying. You're saying that in common vernacular the term "Old Covenant" should point to the Mosaic Covenant since that is the covenant that was directly replaced by the New Covenant. And I can agree with that. However, we should not lose sight of the fact that the OT does contain descriptions and history relating to even older covenants. :oldthumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,380
4,712
Eretz
✟384,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Oh no you di'en't!

You just busted Orthodoxy on me didn't you? LOL

Good to see you my Eastern brother! Keep the faith. lol

Yes I did...we always keep the faith.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,302
2,555
55
Northeast
✟242,264.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I see what you're saying. You're saying that in common vernacular the term "Old Covenant" should point to the Mosaic Covenant since that is the covenant that was directly replaced by the New Covenant. And I can agree with that. However, we should not lose sight of the fact that the OT does contain descriptions and history relating to even older covenants. :oldthumbsup:
Yes, there are older covenants. This is a newer covenant, but not as new as the New Covenant :)

From Numbers 25:
Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned my wrath away from the children of Israel, in that he was jealous with my jealousy among them, so that I didn’t consume the children of Israel in my jealousy. 12 Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give to him my covenant of peace. 13 It shall be to him, and to his offspring after him, the covenant of an everlasting priesthood, because he was jealous for his God, and made atonement for the children of Israel.

What do you think? Is this Covenant still in force? It says it's an everlasting Covenant. But I've also heard that the Hebrew for "everlasting" can also mean "time indefinite".

It has bearing on the thread topic, since the old Covenant (or at least parts of it) are referred to the same way, I think.
 
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
The promises of God’s Word tells us something different….

John 14:26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.

We are promised the Holy Spirit is given to those who obey God. John 14:15-18, Acts 5:32

Jesus out of His own mouth said not to keep traditions of man over the commandments of God. Matthew 15:3-9, Mark 7:7-8 and we should not change one dot of God’s laws which especially include the Ten Commandments that God personally wrote with His own finger.

The problem with man thinking they have equal or greater over authority over the scripture is they start to change a little of God’s Word here or a little there and pretty soon, its nothing like what the scriptures teach. Only the Word of God is pure and we are called to worship Him in both Spirit and Truth. John 4:23-24

God bless!

I agree with the Scriptures you presented. However, you're making a mistake, a logical fallacy of argumentation. Let me explain...

You quoted John 14:26...

John 14:26
New Catholic Bible
26 However, the Advocate, the Holy Spirit,
whom the Father will send in my name,
will teach you everything
and remind you of all
that I have said to you.​

This was spoken by Christ and recorded by the Apostle John in His Gospel between 90 and 100 AD. Here Jesus PROMISES that the Holy Spirit will teach us all things and remind us of all Jesus has taught us. This means Jesus PROMISED that the Holy Spirit would guide the Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers, the Ante-Nicene Fathers, the Nicene Fathers, the Post Nicene Fathers, the Greek Fathers, the Latin Fathers, the Councils, and the Bishops of the Church (historically known as the Magisterium). Remember, Christ founded the Church on Peter's delegated authority, and promised this Church would prevail over all powers resisting her, and that she'd exist in continuity from the very time of her founding until Christ's Parousia.

Matthew 16:17-19
New Catholic Bible
17 Then Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you but my heavenly Father. 18 And I say to you: You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the netherworld will not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”​

IF the Holy Spirit was and is guiding the Church Christ founded in the NT as Christ promised... we ignore Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium to our own peril.

One thing non-Catholics forget is... the Church predates them. The doctrinal language commonly used by non-Catholics, and even the Canon of Scripture they draw from, is a product of the Catholic Church and our Councils. The Church founded by Christ Himself, an actual tangible, REAL, ecclesiastical body, and has existed in Catholic hands, a Church honoring the Seat of Peter, from the beginning. If Christ was telling the truth, and He was, we can be assured that our Sacred Traditions and the teachings of the Magisterium are led of the Holy Spirit.

Isn't it ironic that non-Catholics assume the Holy Spirit leads only those who oppose the ancient faith? And isn't it telling that the rejection of Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium has led to over 20 THOUSAND different non-Catholic private interpretations of Scripture that have created tens of THOUSANDS of different denominations, schisms, sects, heresies, and cults?

God isn't the author of confusion... and sadly... among non-Catholics you'll find an ocean of confusion. Even on these forums non-Catholic Christians are in total disarray, constantly debating their private interpretations, etc., with everyone one of them claiming they are simply reading the Bible and implying that somehow others aren't. lol

As a Catholic, when I speak to you... I'm giving you a solid historical understanding that goes back 20 centuries. In fact, if I had a time machine... I could travel back in time to any point within the past 2,000 years and find a Church practicing what I believe, sincerely holding to the creeds and ideals I embrace, and even practicing a liturgy I'm familiar with. Sadly, most non-Catholics will only find anything remotely like their churches as far back as the 1500's. Beyond that, it's just Catholics and Easter Orthodoxy. And if you go back before the Great Schism... there's only One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

So, yes... I fully agree with John 14:26 that the Holy Spirit will lead us into all truth. I simply accept that the Holy Spirit has been doing this from the first century until now... whereas you assume the Holy Spirit has only guided the churches since the Reformation. That's the logical fallacy and presumption of your argument. As stated before... if the Holy Spirit is leading the Church into all truth... this HIGHLIGHTS the sacredness of our Sacred Traditions, Church Fathers, Councils, and Magisterium.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Please forgive me but I do not believe you. I prefer the scriptures shared with you.

The Scriptures admonish us to honor and obey those bishops and authorities over us and to keep the traditions handed down by word or letter. And we Catholics have been doing this for 20 centuries. :oldthumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
The teachings of Jesus and the "inner voice" of the Holy Spirit.


I believe that Paul is saying that if we love we will automatically fulfill the Law - we have no need to refer to a "list" of do's and don'ts". So we can say the law is "retired" in the sense that we do not need it to guide our actions - as Paul says, if we love, we have done all we need to do.

Amen. Love God. Love others. The rest is merely commentary. :oldthumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Yes I did...we always keep the faith.

I love Orthodoxy! I'm Catholic, but I honestly have deep love and respect for the Eastern Churches. I do think they've frozen in time since the Schism, but that's probably more cultural than intentional. I'm Catholic because I believe in Christ's appointment of Peter's authority and I believe in the Filioque. But I love Eastern prayers, the Eastern liturgy is beautiful beyond words. Also, I prefer icons. But I'm still Catholic. lol
 
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, there are older covenants. This is a newer covenant, but not as new as the New Covenant :)

From Numbers 25:
Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned my wrath away from the children of Israel, in that he was jealous with my jealousy among them, so that I didn’t consume the children of Israel in my jealousy. 12 Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give to him my covenant of peace. 13 It shall be to him, and to his offspring after him, the covenant of an everlasting priesthood, because he was jealous for his God, and made atonement for the children of Israel.

What do you think? Is this Covenant still in force? It says it's an everlasting Covenant. But I've also heard that the Hebrew for "everlasting" can also mean "time indefinite".

It has bearing on the thread topic, since the old Covenant (or at least parts of it) are referred to the same way, I think.

Yes, the the term "everlasting" most often means "time indefinite", unless one is speaking about the nature of YHVH. The subject normally determines its meaning.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,260
6,249
Montreal, Quebec
✟315,116.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You can't have it both ways, this is the law of God that you keep saying is "retired" despite the apostles and Jesus all saying otherwise. I agree it is an absurd position to think the law of God is retired and that we are free to break these laws that God personally wrote for us.
Surely you know that I believe that the Spirit guides us with respect to what is sin or not. I have repeated this many times.

So whether you agree with me on this or not, you know that I do not believe that we are free to sin.
 
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I can claim that all elements of the Law of Moses - including the 10 - are "retired" and not be forced into the position of saying there no sinners.

For example, we need to follow Jesus's teachings - if I fail to follow them, I am a sinner. Likewise, I need to respond to the promptings of the indwelling Spirit. If I reject the leading of the Spirit, I am sinning.

Amen on following the promptings of the Spirit. :oldthumbsup:

According to the Church 10 Commandments still stand to condemn sin. The Law of God is like a schoolmaster revealing our need for a Savior and pointing us to Christ. The Christian is bound by the Law of Love, the Law of Christ. This law is the means of fulfilling the 10 Commandments automatically through love as described by Paul in Romans 13:8-10.

No Christian is entitled to their own opinion for no Scripture is a matter of private interpretation. If the notion isn't embraced by the historical Church... it isn't a historic Christian teaching.

I guess this is why I take issue with people saying, "I can claim..." or "I believe..." or "I take the Scripture as saying..." It's like... hey... there's over 20 centuries of theology, teaching, and tradition, on these things guys. lol
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,826
5,611
USA
✟729,312.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I agree with the Scriptures you presented. However, you're making a mistake, a logical fallacy of argumentation. Let me explain...

You quoted John 14:26...

John 14:26
New Catholic Bible
26 However, the Advocate, the Holy Spirit,
whom the Father will send in my name,
will teach you everything
and remind you of all
that I have said to you.​

This was spoken by Christ and recorded by the Apostle John in His Gospel between 90 and 100 AD. Here Jesus PROMISES that the Holy Spirit will teach us all things and remind us of all Jesus has taught us. This means Jesus PROMISED that the Holy Spirit would guide the Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers, the Ante-Nicene Fathers, the Nicene Fathers, the Post Nicene Fathers, the Greek Fathers, the Latin Fathers, the Councils, and the Bishops of the Church (historically known as the Magisterium). Remember, Christ founded the Church on Peter's delegated authority, and promised this Church would prevail over all powers resisting her, and that she'd exist in continuity from the very time of her founding until Christ's Parousia.

Matthew 14: 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.

This is Jesus speaking to the apostles, but also speaking to us. 1 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,

With this type of thinking we would need to delete the majority of the Bible if we did not have spiritual lessons and instruction for God's Word that is applicable yesterday, today and tomorrow. God's Word is addressed to whomever will not harden their hearts and follow the scripture. What I don't see added in this scripture is this is addressed to the Catholic church. Of course, everyone is invited to follow the Word of God. Also God's Church in scripture is not the Catholic Church- God's Chruch are those who follow His Word. Christ is the head of the Church and those whom are in Christ make up the body.

Matthew 16:17-19
New Catholic Bible
17 Then Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you but my heavenly Father. 18 And I say to you: You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the netherworld will not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”​

IF the Holy Spirit was and is guiding the Church Christ founded in the NT as Christ promised... we ignore Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium to our own detriment.
The church Jesus founded is on based Christ, not on a man. Christ is our Rock, not a man.

1 Corinthians 10:4 and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.


One thing non-Catholics forget is... the Church predates them. The doctrinal language commonly used by non-Catholics, and even the Canon of Scripture they draw from, is a product of the Catholic Church and our Councils. The Church founded by Christ Himself, an actual tangible, REAL, ecclesiastical body, and has existed in Catholic hands, a Church honoring the Seat of Peter, from the beginning. If Christ was telling the truth, and He was, we can be assured that our Sacred Traditions and the teachings of the Magisterium are led of the Holy Spirit.
Again the church are those who follow the Word of God, not the Catholic Church. You can believe in traditions over the commandments, but for me I will follow the instructions of Jesus Christ who said out of His own mouth you are worshipping in vain by obeying traditions over the commandments of God. Matthew 15:3-9. Mark 7:6-7.

Lets get this thread back on topic, this thread is not about the history of the church, its about the laws and what ended if any when Christ died for the forgiveness of our sins and sanctification. So I am asking you kindly to please stay on topic. Thanks and God bless!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,826
5,611
USA
✟729,312.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Surely you know that I believe that the Spirit guides us with respect to what is sin or not. I have repeated this many times.

So whether you agree with me on this or not, you know that I do not believe that we are free to sin.
Sin is defined by breaking the law. The commandments just points out what sin is so we know what not to break. 1 John 3:4, Romans 3:20, Romans 7:7, breaking one commandment is like breaking them all James 2:10-12 and the Spirit is given to obey the commandments John 14:15-18 and to those who obey Act 5:32. We have time right now, to repent and turn to Christ and walk in obedience to Him, but we are warned to those who know the truth and willingly sin. Hebrews 10:26-30.

Where there is no law there is no sin, Romans 4:15 so the Holy Spirit can't guide us into obeying if there is no law to obey Acts 5:32, which means there is no sin. Without the law, we don't need grace and we would not need a Savior because we would all be lost. Praise God He provided us with His written law so we know what sin is.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,260
6,249
Montreal, Quebec
✟315,116.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
One of the misrepresentations we see in this thread is the insistence those who believe the 10 are retired therefore believe we are free to commit murder, adultery, etc.

This is, of course, false.

Whether you like it or not, our position does not force us into such a position no matter how much that would serve your agenda.

The reason is simple and cannot be misunderstood: we believe that the indwelling Spirit as well as the teachings of Jesus give us a moral compass.

You are free to disagree with what we believe to be the case about where one gets moral guidance. But you are most certainly not free to tell us that we believe something that we do not - that it is acceptable to sin.

It is an abject and pernicious falsehood to claim that we think its OK to sin.
 
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Matthew 14: 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.

This is Jesus speaking to the apostles, but also speaking to us. 1 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,

This is speaking for all believers... but especially those who are Bishops and Deacons. This means the Church Fathers, Councils, and Magisterium are equally led of the Spirit and should be heeded. For many, their religion is a home grown self-derived spirituality that has abandoned all historic and authoritative moorings. They walk around in this self-generated illusion thinking their "feelings" constitute truth. I contend that the Spirit will ESPECIALLY lead and guide Bishops and Deacons. This is absolutely necessary if the gates of Hell are not to prevail against the Church.

With this type of thinking we would need to delete the majority of the Bible if we did not have spiritual lessons and instruction for God's Word that is applicable yesterday, today and tomorrow. God's Word is addressed to whomever will not harden their hearts and follow the scripture. What I don't see added in this scripture is this is addressed to the Catholic church. Of course, everyone is invited to follow the Word of God. Also God's Church in scripture is not the Catholic Church- God's Chruch are those who follow His Word. Christ is the head of the Church and those whom are in Christ make up the body.

Try to keep in mind that the term "Catholic" is simply the ancient word for "Universal". It speaks of the Universal Christian Church dating back to Christ and the Apostles themselves. Jesus founded only ONE Church. And He appointed Peter head of that Church. And in II Clement, and the writings of the Fathers, we read how Peter handed that office down to his successors. Let's look at the authority Jesus invested in Peter. Jesus said...

Matthew 16:17-19
New Catholic Bible
17 Then Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you but my heavenly Father. 18 And I say to you: You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the netherworld will not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”​

What does it mean to have authority to "bind and loose"? Remember, this was a Jewish phrase. The Jewish Encyclopedia explains it well...

Binding and loosing (Hebrew, asar ve-hittir) . . . Rabbinical term for ‘forbidding and permitting. The power of binding and loosing was always claimed by the Pharisees. Under Queen Alexandra, the Pharisees, says Josephus (Wars of the Jews 1:5:2), “became the administrators of all public affairs so as to be empowered to banish and readmit whom they pleased, as well as to loose and to bind.” The various schools had the power “to bind and to loose”; that is, to forbid and to permit (Talmud: Chagigah 3b); and they could also bind any day by declaring it a fast day (Talmud: Ta’anit 12a). . . . This power and authority, vested in the rabbinical body of each age of the Sanhedrin, received its ratification and final sanction from the celestial court of justice (Sifra, Emor, 9; Talmud: Makkot 23b).

With this we realize that the Office of Peter was specifically invested with the authority to "forbid and permit" various interpretations, practices, feast days, devotions, etc. This is no joke. Jesus is appointing Peter the earthly head of the Church to lead it in His absence, which makes the reality of the Church from Peter down being led of the Spirit of even greater importance than merely the flights of fancy to support some private personal interpretation.

he church Jesus founded is on based Christ, not on a man. Christ is our Rock, not a man.

1 Corinthians 10:4 and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.

Yes, Christ is our Rock. And our Rock appointed Peter... as the Rock on which HE would build His Church...

Matthew 16:17-19​
New Catholic Bible
17 Then Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you but my heavenly Father. 18 And I say to you: You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the netherworld will not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

To deny this and reject Peter's authority is to deny Christ (Matthew 10:40). In addition, Paul admonished us to obey Church authority...

Hebrews 13:17
New Catholic Bible
Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they watch over your souls and will have to render an account in that regard. Make this a joy for them to do rather than a grief, for that would be of no advantage to you.​

Those who disregard Church authority are to be admonished to submit and embrace the Faith.

Again the church are those who follow the Word of God, not the Catholic Church. You can believe in traditions over the commandments, but for me I will follow the instructions of Jesus Christ who said out of His own mouth you are worshipping in vain by obeying traditions over the commandments of God. Matthew 15:3-9. Mark 7:6-7.

That's not historically accurate. In fact, Scripture is a part of Sacred Tradition. Keep in mind, the Catholic Church compiled, translated, and established the Canon of Scripture at the end of the Fourth Century. That's right... the Church Christ founded had no canon for nearly 400 years. There was no printing press. Copies of copies of various Epistles (many of spurious origin) were circulated among the churches... but there was no "fixed" canon. We had to establish a Canon to serve as final word on Christology. We established the Canon to serve as the final word on matters involving Christ, NOT all matters of faith. For example, the Scriptures mention ordaining Bishops and Deacons. But the actual process of doing so, the prayers, the liturgy, etc. are recorded in the writings of the Fathers. The Bible admonishes that Christians pray. However, the Divine Office of prayer dating back to the first century of the Church and modeled after the synagogue liturgies of ancient Judaism was the method by which they prayed. When one realizes the Bible didn't just fall out of the sky, it is a product of the Church, one is on their way to properly understanding it. The Bible is a product of the Church, not the Church a product of the Bible. And the Bible's purpose (namely the NT) was to establish a Canon upon which to fix the Christology of the Church. If you want to know about Jesus... read the NT. If you want to know Church tradition and custom, read the Fathers. If you want to know how the Church resolved controversies and condemned heresies, study the Councils. If you want to know what Church authorities have taught down through the ages, and what official has final authority in the body today, study the Magisterium.

Lets get this thread back on topic, this thread is not about the history of the church, its about the laws and what ended if any when Christ died for the forgiveness of our sins and sanctification. So I am asking you kindly to please stay on topic. Thanks and God bless!

Here's the problem... everyone has a different opinion. It's chaos and confusion on the matter. Just a constant argument. Therefore, it is necessary to establish who has the authority to issue the final say regarding what laws ended and what laws continued. We can't treat this like a buffet bar picking and choosing as we go. There's over 2,000 years of Christian history and theological authority that has spoken on the matter. There's no need for confusion. There's no need for a dozen private interpretations on this thread. The Church has been definitive on the topic. The question is... who will lovingly obey the Body of Christ?
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,260
6,249
Montreal, Quebec
✟315,116.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I guess this is why I take issue with people saying, "I can claim..." or "I believe..." or "I take the Scripture as saying..." It's like... hey... there's over 20 centuries of theology, teaching, and tradition, on these things guys. lol
And precisely why should we believe that the tradition and historical teaching is beyond error?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

Christopher0121

Brother In Christ
Jun 28, 2011
557
304
Ohio
✟43,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
One of the misrepresentations we see in this thread is the insistence those who believe the 10 are retired therefore believe we are free to commit murder, adultery, etc.

This is, of course, false.

Whether you like it or not, our position does not force us into such a position no matter how much that would serve your agenda.

The reason is simple and cannot be misunderstood: we believe that the indwelling Spirit as well as the teachings of Jesus give us a moral compass.

You are free to disagree with what we believe to be the case about where one gets moral guidance. But you are most certainly not free to tell us that we believe something that we do not - that it is acceptable to sin.

It is an abject and pernicious falsehood to claim that we think its OK to sin.

It doesn't matter what you believe, I believe, or anyone else believes. The Church has ruled that the 10 Commandments are of an eternal moral nature and not only perfectly express God's holiness but man's need for a Savior and therefore are binding today. And they are fulfilled simply by living a life of love towards God and others. Beyond this, we have feast days, traditions, and cultural manners and customs.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.