This is all fine. One is tormented by his own sin or by his remorse or by a law of cause and effect or by the presence of the loving God. God is not a tormenter. But there is torment anyway for one reason or another. For the purpose of correction, but there is still torment. I'm trying to look at the big picture. And in DeRose's scenario, this torment is for a very long time. True, it is not forever, but it is almost forever.I see the scenario differently I think in that I don't see any torment because there is no tormenter. God is always the prodigal's father, desperately waiting for his child to realise what it is that will make him truly happy and then come home. The prodigal's son did truly suffer for sure but that wasn't through torment byhis father - for some reason it was necessary and we don't really know why. And this suffering did have an end and there was a joyous ending.
Heb 10:26 For if we deliberately go on sinning after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,27 but a terrifying expectation of judgment and the fury of a fire about to consume the adversaries. 30 For we know the one who has said, Vengeance belongs to me; I will repay, and again, The Lord will judge his people. 31 It is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
Yes, there is a difference. This is why I do not think that ECT is likely.Is there not a qualitative difference between endless and purposeless suffering by a wrathful tormenter as advocated by Team Hell and the educational and redemptive suffering that causes so much pain to the loving father as is taught in the parable of the prodigal son?
Upvote
0