- Sep 4, 2005
- 28,100
- 16,995
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
True. Yet perhaps was isn't working, wasn't working prior to their incarceration. Bad parenting, schooling, liberal, every one is a winner teaching, and you have a right to express yourself by burning, pillaging and plundering. It's not your fault you're an idiot and a thief. They have more money than you so they should give you some. Forget the job, vote for me we'll take money from working folk and give to you. We'll just raise taxes. Ok? Don't forget to vote. Love you brother, stay out of my neighborhood.
Couldn't help myself. It just came out.
I think there's a difference between a coddling sort of "it isn't your fault your a thief, it's all systemic injustice that's the culprit" mentality like that within some of the far left, and a more pragmatic approach of "this action was your fault, but we're going to get to the root of the problem and give you tools and training to fix it" is a better approach.
What we know doesn't work, is "up against the wall scumbag!!! eyes forward!!!", and tossing someone into a "lion's den" so to speak.
I would liken it to drug related or property crime matters.
I can rightfully say that anyone choosing to rob a bank is making a dumb decision. The question becomes, what's the best approach to setting them back on the right path. I don't think it's a "fight for survival, assert your own aggression or have your food stolen and get sodomized in the shower room" environment.
I think it has to be a more human approach.
Otherwise you'll just end up with a more hostile violent person at the end of the sentence than the person who went in. At the end of the day, incarceration should still achieve the goal of making the person better, not worse.
Upvote
0