Biden Drops the Hammer on Unvaccinated

[muichimotsu]

I never said every antibiotic works... Where did you get that?

You're myopically focusing on a treatment that, as I recall, is fairly expensive and not widely available, so 1) it's irrelevant that it's an antibiotic anyway and 2) you're treating everyone as if they have the same access and opportunity, when they don't, because America is cutthroat in its capitalism

 

[muichimotsu]

Rule violation. You are not permitted to use the smiley in this manner.

No, that's mockworthy, you're claiming it's untested, when it most definitely is and people's choices are not an absolute in a public health emergency, so their willfullness is also worthy of mockery. Free market of ideas...you're not a communist are you?

 

[TLK Valentine]

So, we should take the jab not knowing?

Not knowing what might happen 5, 10, 25 years from now?

 

[renniks]

So ask a qualifier that isn't dishonest in regards to how they phrased the statement. They mean don't take treatment from a hospital if you have symptomatic covid, unless you're so deluded you don't even believe it's real, in which case you're already digging your own grace

No that's not what was said. The implication was do not use the hospital at all if you don't have the jab.

 

[renniks]

Pst, I think they were being sarcastic, don't assume you know their tone immediately.

Of course, mocking is sarcastic.

 

[renniks]

You're myopically focusing on a treatment that, as I recall, is fairly expensive and not widely available, so 1) it's irrelevant that it's an antibiotic anyway and 2) you're treating everyone as if they have the same access and opportunity, when they don't, because America is cutthroat in its capitalism

Huh? Now you are just inventing stuff I never said.

 

[renniks]

No, that's mockworthy, you're claiming it's untested, when it most definitely is and people's choices are not an absolute in a public health emergency, so their willfullness is also worthy of mockery. Free market of ideas...you're not a communist are you?

It doesn't matter if you think it's mock worthy... it's a rule violation.

 

[renniks]

Not knowing what might happen 5, 10, 25 years from now?

For many it's much shorter. Like days after.

 

[muichimotsu]

No that's not what was said. The implication was do not use the hospital at all if you don't have the jab.

Not necessarily: maybe don't assume people's intentions from a limited exchange and have some intellectual curiosity instead of arrogantly assuming more than you have a basis for.

 

[muichimotsu]

Of course, mocking is sarcastic.

So just play victim now? Are you that thin skinned to not be able to deal with someone satirically responding to your allegations with something that is meant to point out the problems in your argument? Sarcasm is not innately malicious, don't behave in a way that suggests you can't have any kind of civil discussion without reducing it to someone supposedly "insulting" you rather than insulting your argument (which is not you)

 

[muichimotsu]

For many it's much shorter. Like days after.

And that's within expectations, the most in terms of these ill effects is about 2 months and we have studies on that that are pretty significant because of better record keeping in the modern age and unprecedented amounts of vaccinations, numbering in the billions worldwide.

 

[muichimotsu]

Huh? Now you are just inventing stuff I never said.

So you admit that antibiotics only have a particular application at best and that they are not necessarily the frontline treatment? And also that it isn't necessarily available universally.

 

[TLK Valentine]

For many it's much shorter. Like days after.

I've heard stories, too. What of them?

 

[muichimotsu]

It doesn't matter if you think it's mock worthy... it's a rule violation.

Then it also doesn't matter if you think it's a rule violation, demonstrate that it is rather than just being a legalist.

 

[Aldebaran]

Then it also doesn't matter if you think it's a rule violation, demonstrate that it is rather than just being a legalist.

Here's a demonstration:
PLEASE READ : A change in the flaming rule

Read the second paragraph.

 

[renniks]

So just play victim now? Are you that thin skinned to not be able to deal with someone satirically responding to your allegations with something that is meant to point out the problems in your argument? Sarcasm is not innately malicious, don't behave in a way that suggests you can't have any kind of civil discussion without reducing it to someone supposedly "insulting" you rather than insulting your argument (which is not you)

They were insulting. Shrug. Nothing new.

 

[renniks]

So you admit that antibiotics only have a particular application at best and that they are not necessarily the frontline treatment? And also that it isn't necessarily available universally.

I never claimed anything but that the antibiotics were a treatment for covid. So what am I supposed to be " admitting?"

 

[renniks]

Then it also doesn't matter if you think it's a rule violation, demonstrate that it is rather than just being a legalist.

Go ahead and be penalized if you choose not to believe me. I know from experience.

 

[renniks]

I've heard stories, too. What of them?

When there's thosands of stories it might be time to start listening.

 

[TLK Valentine]

When there's thosands of stories it might be time to start listening.

There are thousands of stories featuring a killer with a hook.

But that's different, because one of those actually happened to a friend of a friend...