Idaho doctor reports a ‘20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients

[KCfromNC]

Idaho doctor reports a ‘20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients

From the article:

Much like HIV causes immune system disruption by suppressing CD4 “helper” cells, the same thing happens when CD8 “killer” cells are suppressed. In Dr. Cole’s expert view, this is what seems to be the case with the COVID-19 jabs.

Cole goes on to state that as a result of this vaccine-induced “killer T-cell” suppression, he is seeing an “uptick” of not only endometrial cancer, but also melanomas, as well as herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV when “looking at the cervical biopsies of women.”

A bit about this doctor's antics : How a rogue doctor who called the vaccine 'needle rape' was made an Idaho public-health official in its worst COVID crisis yet

Cole told Insider that vaccinology and epidemiology "have been part of my entire career," though he did not name specific qualifications or experience to substantiate the claim.

As the pandemic spread, Cole's dermopathology lab expanded from analyzing skin samples to also processing COVID-19 tests.

Data from those tests — which is not public — "gives him a very unique view on broad public health," Cole Diagnostics spokesperson Kelli Cole told Insider.
​

Hmm, having special knowledge that no one else does, but can't be shared? Yep, move this thread to the conspiracy theory forum.

 

[A_Thinker]

“I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year, I’m like ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before’,” he continued.

I think that's fairly unambiguous. He's been doing this for years. He knows what is normal, and he's seen an uptick.

He's seen cancers tick up ... in the first 3 months of vaccination ... ??? I'd be looking for a different agent ...

 

[A_Thinker]

Or do you just have totalitarian inclinations, and a desire to suppress information you don't like?

That's quite a leap ...

 

[A_Thinker]

LOL! Isn't it funny how factchecking seems to almost always be a hobby of lefty, censorious types?

As if fact-checking is a bad thing ?

 

[Original Happy Camper]

It would nice if these anti vaxxers would find a non biased site.

It would nice if these vaxxers would find a non biased site.

 

[Nithavela]

Thank you for at least looking at the substance of the piece.

You're welcome.

 

[Original Happy Camper]

When I googled "Dr.Cole Vaccine" and at once found an article on factcheck.org with a video explaining untruths the doctor have claimed: Video: Idaho Doctor Makes Baseless Claims About Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines - FactCheck.org

are fact checkers unbiased and / or independent?

 

[Goonie]

He's seen cancers tick up ... in the first 3 months of vaccination ... ??? I'd be looking for a different agent ...

A lot of doctors will in a sense see an uptick in cancers, as people who have been told to avoid putting pressure on healthcare for the past 18 months start going to the doctor's again with odd bumps and pains.

 

[Original Happy Camper]

The issue I see in this is the t cells.

 

[Nithavela]

Thank you for at least looking at the substance of the piece.

Didn't you?

 

[A_Thinker]

It would nice if these vaxxers would find a non biased site.

What sites might you suggest ???

 

[A_Thinker]

are fact checkers unbiased and / or independent?

At least they claim to be ....

 

[KCfromNC]

As if fact-checking is a bad thing ?

I could imagine it would be if there's a requirement to believe things which aren't facts.

 

[Original Happy Camper]

What sites might you suggest ???

They are all biased on this issue for it or against it.

Stay with the word of GOD he does not employ coercion only satan does

mat
16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

 

[Original Happy Camper]

At least they claim to be ....

ah yes self justification

 

[hedrick]

I found this quite easily, surely there may be others?

Two Different Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) Risks for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

Yes. It’s definitely a risk. That’s one reason the first vaccines used a different approach, and it’s also the reason testing was done before giving the emergency use authorization. These vaccines have now been used on an enormous number of people. Problems like this would be known by now.

 

[Original Happy Camper]

Yes. It’s definitely a risk. That’s one reason the first vaccines used a different approach, and it’s also the reason testing was done before giving the emergency use authorization. These vaccines have now been used on an enormous number of people. Problems like this would be known by now.

and who is going to allow those reports in the news? those that support vaccination?

 

[Original Happy Camper]

but because of all of the lockdowns etc. people have not been to the doctor with that suspicious lump, or odd Pain.

Thanks for the vote for no more masks or lockdowns

 

[Original Happy Camper]

One doctor ... has noted a "20 times increase" in his OWN cancer patients ???

Well ... just how many patients does he have ?

P.S. I perceive that there is a "lying spirit" behind much of the off-hand anti-vax disinformation we are being peddled. You can't even justify this as an "error" ...

Did you notice that he is a pathologist he has no patients only tissue and blood samples

 

[Goonie]

Thanks for the vote for no more masks or lockdowns

It's no such vote. It is a preemptive explanation for the inevitable increase in diagnosis of cancer and other diseases that some will wrongly attribute to vaccines.