• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is the thousand years of Revelation chapter 20 symbolic?

Status
Not open for further replies.

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not answering you on Mat 25 again. If you want to play games using scripture, you can answer to Jesus when the time comes.

Verse 46 is so obviously a statement regarding everything that came before from verse 31 onward, and wrapping up verses 31-45, that you have to be deliberately ... whatever your motive is.

Like I said, I'm not answering you on Mat 25 again (or at all about anything), because you abuse the Lord's words and the Bible by turning them into your pieces on a chess board, and it proves how "highly" you regard the Word of God. I already answered on Mat 24:11-45, and verse 46 wraps up what Jesus was saying in those evrses.

The fact of the matter is, the nations on the right cannot be saints being commended for the good they did for themselves. Verse 46 must be understood in the light of that fact.

I'm not answering you again on Mat 25, and I'll probably just ignore you for a long time to come, because you choose to abuse the Word of God by turning it into your pieces on a chess board. You are not giving me the impression you really care about it.


If you cannot handle the fact that there are no mortals left alive on the planet at the end of Matthew 25:46, there is no need to get upset with me.
If the verse acts like a knife which kills the Premill doctrine, then let the sacred cow die.

Paul said in 2 Timothy 4:1 Christ judges both the living and the dead at His appearing.
The judgment of the living at His Second Coming is described in Matthew 25:31-46.
The judgment of the dead is described in John 5:27-30.

The timing of both of these judgments is found in Revelation 11:15-18, and also at the end of Revelation 20.

Your Bible says the same thing.

.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Spiritual Jew
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Psalm 2, we see the Lord smashing the rebellion of the nations with a rod of iron. In the Revelation, the author of the book uses the Greek word shepherd to speak about the Lord's reign over the nations.

Matthew 25 confirms Psalm 2, as is clear by the passage:

By the time Jesus is judging between the nations, it's quite obvious that those being judged by Him at this point in time all know that He is Lord, and they now all believe in Him - because He is now seated on the throne of His glory, and they are being judged by Him.

So the Lord speaks to the nations on His right, saying,

"Come, blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.

For I was hungry, and you gave me food; I was thirsty, and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and you took Me in; I was naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me."

And when those whom Jesus calls "the righteous" in this passage answered saying,

"Lord, when did we see You hungry, and fed You? Or thirsty, and gave You drink? When did we see You a stranger, and took You in? Or naked, and clothed You? Or when did we see You sick, or in prison, and came to You?"

Then Jesus replies by telling them about how they treated His people - the saved Christians:

"And the King shall answer and say to them, Truly I say to you, Inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brothers, you have done it to Me."

Is Jesus talking to Christians - those who have already been resurrected - about how they treated Christians?
Yes. Jesus said his brothers are those who obey His Father (Matt 12:50), so that would be Christians. They are the the ones who were the most needy. Many people become Christians after experiencing the kindness of other Christians. Who else would He be talking about?

You also believe that Paul is equating the saints inheriting the Kingdom with the NHNE.

Yet Jesus continued in Matthew 25:

"Then He also shall say to those on the left hand, Depart from Me, you cursed, into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels." Mat 25:41

The everlasting fire prepared for Satan and his angels - which the Revelation speaks of as occurring at the close of the millennium - and because you have assumed that the millennium is symbolic of this current age, in your mind this casting of Satan and his angels into the lake of fire "must" occur at the same time as the Lord is judging the nations. YET the passage starts off like this:

"But when the Son of man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He shall sit on the throne of His glory. And ALL NATIONS shall be gathered before Him.

And He shall separate them from one another, as a shepherd divides the sheep from the goats.
And indeed He shall set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats off the left.

Then the King shall say to those on His right hand, Come, blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.

For I was hungry, and you gave me food; I was thirsty, and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and you took Me in;
I was naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me" Mat 25:31-36

So these inherit the Kingdom based on how they treated Jesus - and He bases how they treated HIM on how they had treated HIS SAINTS.
I agree so far.

Not so for those on His left. They did not treat His saints so well. So they are reserved for the same punishment reserved for Satan and his angels:

Revelation 20
"10 And the Devil who deceived them was cast into the Lake of Fire and Brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet were. And he will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
11 And I saw a great white throne, and Him sitting on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away. And a place was not found for them.
12 And I saw the dead, the small and the great, stand before God. And the books were opened, and another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead in it. And death and hell delivered up the dead in them. And each one of them was judged according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the Lake of Fire. This is the second death.
15 And if anyone was not found having been written in the Book of Life, he was cast into the Lake of Fire."
Since Matthew 25:41 is the same event as Rev 20:15, why do you not see them as happening at the same time? The time it occurs is at the second coming of Christ (Matt 25:31) it's AFTER the thousand years. That lines up with amil.

Regarding Mat 25, Amils assume that when the Lord gathers ALL NATIONS for judgment when He appears, the sheep on His right who treated the Lord well by treating His saints well, are the same saints - they treated themselves well.
No, you are misrepresenting our view yet again. You repeatedly misunderstand what amil believes. He is talking about saints who were blessed with all the food, drinks, clothing, etc. they needed and they graciously gave to the needy out of reverence for Christ because they know that's what He wants us to do. The needy can see the love of Christ through the actions of His people and that makes them want to be Christians, too.

Well that's OK. You may continue with all your false assumptions, you're still a saint if you belong to Jesus - but I can see the error in the Amil thinking.
What false assumptions might those be?

Jesus calls those of the nations on his right "righteous" because He is referring to their works with regard to how they treated His saints. The Kingdom He is referring to is not the NHNE
How do you come to this conclusion? I'm going to just show the verses that apply to the sheep except for those that give the details of what they did for needy people.

Matthew 25:31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. 34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.....46 “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

According to this, believers inherit "eternal life" in the "kingdom prepared for" us "since the creation of the world". Is a temporal kingdom the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world or an eternal one? Clearly, it's eternal or else it wouldn't say that that the sheep/righteous inherit "eternal life". It's eternal because we will have immortal bodies at that point and it will be the new heavens and new earth kingdom of God because mortal "flesh and blood will not inherit the kingdom of God".

, and these who He bids to go into His literal thousand year Kingdom are not resurrected - because they missed the resurrection of the saints which occurred when Christ appeared in the clouds and sent out His angels to gather his elect.
This can't be. You are contradicting what Paul said. He said very clearly that mortal "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God". Why are you trying to get around that?

Daniel 7
11 Then I was looking because of the voice of the great words which the horn spoke. I watched until the beast was slain, and his body was destroyed and given to the burning flame.
12 And the rest of the beasts, their dominion was taken away. Yet their lives were made longer for a season and time. Daniel 7:11-12
Verse 12 here is a parenthetical verse and what is described there should not be understood to follow what is described in verse 11. The NIV translators understood this, which is why they translated it like this:

11 “Then I continued to watch because of the boastful words the horn was speaking. I kept looking until the beast was slain and its body destroyed and thrown into the blazing fire. 12 (The other beasts had been stripped of their authority, but were allowed to live for a period of time.)

Before verse 11, Daniel had described four beasts in Daniel 7. Verse 11 refers to the fourth beast. The other beasts he mentions in verse 12 are the first 3 beasts which represent historical kingdoms (Babylonian Empire, Medo-Persian empire and Greek empire) and those kingdoms are long gone by the time the fourth beast is destroyed.

Daniel 7:11 lines up with Revelation 19:20. Please tell me, if Daniel 7:12 speaks of something that occurs after Daniel 7:11/Rev 19:20 then what other beasts will still exist after the beast of Rev 19:20 is cast into the lake of fire?

How can you read OSAS into what Paul is saying in 1 Cor 15? How can you fail to see that there are two "deaths"? The Revelation in chapter 20 states very clearly and unambiguously that the second death will have no power over those who have already been resurrected. What is the second death if not what the Bible, freed from Amil theolgy, states it is - ie the casting into the lake of fire at the GWT and at the close of a one-thousand year period when death and hades have delivered up all the souls that were in them?
This isn't about OSAS which I don't believe in. If you're uncomfortable with me saying the second death has no power over us now then let's not get bogged down with that. Would you agree that when we die and our souls and spirits go to heaven that the second death would no longer have power over us at that point? That's what Jesus said.

Rev 2:10 Do not be afraid of what you are about to suffer. I tell you, the devil will put some of you in prison to test you, and you will suffer persecution for ten days. Be faithful, even to the point of death, and I will give you life as your victor’s crown. 11 Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who is victorious will not be hurt at all by the second death.

If we are faithful unto death, then the Lord gives us the victor's crown (or crown of life) and at that point the second death has no power over us. Our destiny is sealed at that point. We are guaranteed to avoid the second death at that point. We don't have to wait to be bodily resurrected in order for the second death to not have power over us. That is the case immediately upon death for Christians.

I have stated a number of times that I believe the first resurrection itself is Christ's resurrection.

Acts 26:23 that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would bring the message of light to his own people and to the Gentiles.”

1 Cor 15:20 But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.

We have part in His resurrection spiritually when we become saved.

Eph 2:4 4 But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, 5 made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved. 6 And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus,

Since you are not comfortable with me saying that at this point the second death doesn't have power over us because we belong to Christ then so be it. I don't want to argue about that. Let's instead talk about what happens to us when we physically die. I would hope you agree our souls then go to be with the Lord in heaven (absent from the body, present with the Lord).

We will have been faithful unto death at that point, so the second death will not have power over us at that point (Rev 2:10-11). We will have had part in Christ's resurrection and Christians reign with Him in heaven when we die. That's what John saw in Rev 20.

The mass resurrection of believers at Christ's coming cannot be the first resurrection because His resurrection is the first resurrection and we all have part in it spiritually.

The order of resurrections is given here:

1 Cor 15:22 For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive. 23 But each in turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him.

This makes it clear that Christ's resurrection is the first resurrection unto bodily immortality and next in turn to be resurrected will be the dead in Christ when He comes. So, that resurrection is a second resurrection, not the first.

Mortals will not inherit the NHNE. Flesh and blood will not inherit the NHNE. No Pre-millennialist has ever said that flesh and blood will inherit the NHNE.

All Pre-mills are saying is that the Bible means what it says regarding the thousand years.
Amils believe that, too. You take "means what it says" to mean that it has to be literal. Does that mean when it's symbolic it doesn't mean what it says? Sure, it does. But, just in a symbolic way, not literal. It symbolizes something real.

BAmills can't accept that, so they keep getting the crazy idea that Pre-mills believe flesh and blood will inherit the NHNE - and the reason you guys do so, is because it's you who has the thousand years mixed up with the current age in your heads and nothing in-between this age and the NHNE.
You are confused. Matthew 25:31-46 clearly occurs when Christ returns (see Matt 25:31). At that time believers inherit eternal life in the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world. That has to be referring to the NHNE and not a temporal earthly kingdom because mortal flesh and blood will not inherit God's kingdom. But premil has mortal "flesh and blood" inheriting the kingdom when Christ returns. That cannot be. So, Matt 25:34 is referring to the NHNE and not a temporal earthly kingdom as premil believes.

Further proof that Matt 25:34,46 equates to Rev 21:1-4 is the fact that Matt 25:41 equates to Rev 20:15. There is no way to reasonably conclude that Matthew 25:34&46 or Matt 25:41&46 refer to a different event than Rev 20:10-21:4.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Who was James addressing below in his letter, if it was not the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ?

Jas 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
Testing of Your Faith
Jas 1:2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations;
Jas 1:3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.

.......................................................


Rev_14:4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.


Who would be the "firstfruits" in the verse below?

Rom_16:5 Likewise greet the church that is in their house. Salute my wellbeloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ.



Who are like a "virgin" in the verse below?

2Co_11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.



Do you realize the Northern tribes were taken into captivity hundreds of years before the time of Christ, and no longer exist as pure bloodlines? (See what Paul said about genealogies in Titus 3:9.)

If the number 144,000 is not being used in a symbolic manner, why is there exactly 12,000 in each of the twelve tribes? This exact number never occurs in the numerations from the Old Testament.


.
The numbers are symbolic of exact numbers. God only knows. Perhaps that song was written for today. It is pretty tough being a virgin these days.

Those living around 30AD were on both sides of the Cross. They are all firstfruits of the first coming.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
For I was hungry, and you gave me food; I was thirsty, and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and you took Me in;
I was naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me" Mat 25:31-36
The first responders of the covid crisis? If this was a prophecy of this very year and time, and they are still alive after the 4th seal, and are not in Christ, it was not talking about people during His 1st advent nor the church period of 1990 years. It was talking about unsaved people taking care of the body of Christ prior to the Rapture/Second Coming.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Where do the gospels and epistles teach of 2 future bodily resurrections of mankind separated by a period of time? or is this something only revelation 20 mentions?


It is impossible to teach or prophecy a future false doctrine. There is only one bodily resurrection, and it has nothing to do with the church at all. The NT authors and all humans at that time knew there was only one bodily resurrection and it was at the Cross, past history. The next one after the Rapture of the church would not be for the church. They did not look forward to that first Resurrection.

The church knew they were resurrected in Christ. They did not miss the Resurrection that happened in 30AD. They barely even mentioned it, except for Matthew's small comment.

The first resurrection is Jesus. Any resurrection after Jesus would not be the first.
a.) Revelation 1:5 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth.

b.) 1 Corinthians 15:20 But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.

c.)Colossians 1:18 And He is the head of the body, the church; He is the beginning and firstborn from among the dead, so that in all things He may have preeminence
The Cross was the Resurrection of the last day. It fulfilled the OT prophecy that would not leave them in sheol. It was bodily. Paul told the Thessalonians not to worry, because it was ok to miss that resurrection. "The Day of the Lord is not the next 1990 years." It would come after the Rapture/Second Coming, not prior to that. 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3

"But in connection with the coming of our Lord Yeshua the Messiah and our gathering together to meet him, we ask you, brothers,
2 not to be easily shaken in your thinking or anxious because of a spirit or a spoken message or a letter supposedly from us claiming that the Day of the Lord has already come.
3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way."
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
You've mentioned talking to a pyschiatrist a couple times. That is a fact. I will find those posts and quote them to you if you want.

My point is that God does not reveal truth to only one person. You have views that no one else does. Why? Do you believe God reveals truth only to you?

I do apologize for saying your psychiatrist can help you determine why. I'll refrain from making any comments like that in the future. I'm just trying to figure out how you come up with your unique views. I just don't believe that God reveals truth to only one person.
Well, Paul was one person. John the Baptist was one person. Saying God cannot use one person would disqualify all the Reformers who stood against a harlot church. It would disqualify all the evangelist of the last 300 years. It would even disqualify the one who came up with the recap teaching of Revelation. Unless you are going to start tossing out truth that even you accept?

I just post my thoughts. Take them or reject them. We can reason things out, and hopefully for the better, not to the point of emotional anger. I never meant to cause that much disagreement. Would to God all here can be used of God. But John the Baptist said, "I must decrease while Jesus Christ must increase." It is not about us, but the Lord.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Do you truly think that amil may not believe in the resurrection of the dead? You know we do, so why even bring that up or why agree with someone else that it could be true?
Some claim that Sadducess followed the teaching of Epicurus, who may have been an atheist. Yet they were priest of God. Where did Moses deny an afterlife? Amil are not atheist, and that seems to be the only reason Sadducess were that messed up. The point I was making, is that denying the Lord's Day, and claim it does not exist, is pretty much stating there is an afterlife, but according to our tradition, and not any new or former revelation of God. The Sadducess rejected most of the OT, and certainly rejected Judaism and it's oral traditions. Amil do have to go against the millennium and the standard acceptance, if by definition alone. Are they purely and only in response to "post" and "pre" views? Not necessarily. They denied the Lord's Day back in Paul's day and claimed they were already living in the future millennium. Paul said, "whoa, do not be deceived." The millennium will not happen until Christ returns.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well, Paul was one person. John the Baptist was one person.
But they didn't teach things that only they believed the way you seem to do.

Saying God cannot use one person would disqualify all the Reformers who stood against a harlot church. It would disqualify all the evangelist of the last 300 years. It would even disqualify the one who came up with the recap teaching of Revelation. Unless you are going to start tossing out truth that even you accept?
The original truth comes from God who gave the information to the authors of the Bible. There isn't just one person who sees Revelation as a series of recapitulations.

None of them taught anything that no one else believed the way you seem to do. Such as you implying earlier that Satan would overcome Christ and the church at some point. What other Christian would ever dream of saying that Satan could ever overcome Christ? None. That is my point. All these other people you mentioned didn't teach things that no one else believed.

I just post my thoughts. Take them or reject them. We can reason things out, and hopefully for the better, not to the point of emotional anger. I never meant to cause that much disagreement. Would to God all here can be used of God. But John the Baptist said, "I must decrease while Jesus Christ must increase." It is not about us, but the Lord.
I am fine with that. I'm just concerned about all the times you make claims that no one else believes. Doesn't that concern you?

Anyway, enough about that. Carry on. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
 
Upvote 0

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 18, 2020
3,010
930
Africa
✟223,456.00
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE EITHER ONE OR THE OTHER
If there's one thing threads like these show beyond the shadow of any doubt, it's that A/Pre millennialists either ignore passages which collide with their A/Pre-mill theology, or interpret them in the "light" of their A/Pre-mil theology, and as a result, A/Premils all wind up with back-to-front and upside-down interpretations of many passages of scripture.

The OP in this thread and many other posts made by Pre-mils have shown very clearly that Amil has some serious scriptural problems that refutes Amil. The A-mils who posted in this thread have shown that Pre-mil has some serious scriptural problems that refutes Pre-mil.

So let's recap on a few facts and questions before we talk about "time":-

Revelation 2:26-29

And he who overcomes and keeps My works to the end, to him I will give power over the nations.
And he will rule (Greek ποιμαίνω poimaínō shepherd) them with a rod of iron, as the vessels of a potter they will be broken to pieces, even as I received from My Father.

And I will give him the Morning Star.
He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.


In the Lord's words above, there is a conditional promise made. Those who overcome and keep the Lord's works to the end, the same will be given power over the nations.

The question is, "to the end" of what? If it is to the end of the life of the people to whom the promise is made, then the promise that they will rule over the nations is something which is to come after the end of their lives,

but if it's to the end of a period of tribulation, then the question arises, Has there ever been a time when all saints received power of the nations, and ruled (shepherded them) with a rod of iron?

Jesus said to those who followed Him while He was on the earth:

"Truly I say to you that you who have followed Me, in the regeneration, when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of His glory, you also shall sit on twelve thrones, judging (Greek κρίνω krínō) the twelve tribes of Israel." (Matthew 24:28)

Does this mean that they will sit with Him at the time of the Great White Throne? Or would this mean ruling over, as the judges of Israel did which we read about in the book of Judges? The Greek word for judging in Matthew 24:28 is: G2919 κρίνω KRI/NW krínō kree'-no properly, to distinguish, i.e. decide (mentally or judicially); by implication, to try, condemn, punish:--avenge, conclude, condemn, damn, decree, determine, esteem, judge, go to (sue at the) law, ordain, call in question, sentence to, think.

The next question is, in light of these promises, is Matthew 25:31-42 the same as the Great White Throne, as those who do not believe in a literal thousand years claim?

If so, how can this be, since Paul tells us that at the time of the end, Christ will cause all rule and authority and power to cease, and hand the Kingdom back to God the Father (I Corinthians 15:21-28):

"But now Christ has risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruit of those who slept.
For since death is through man, the resurrection of the dead also is through a Man.
For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all will be made alive.

But each in his own order: Christ the first-fruit, and afterward they who are Christ's at His coming;
then is the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God, even the Father; when He makes to cease all rule and all authority and power.

for it is right for Him to reign until He has put all the enemies under His feet.
The last enemy made to cease is death.
For He put all things under His feet. But when He says that all things have been put under His feet, it is plain that it excepts Him who has put all things under Him.


But when all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subject to Him who has subjected things to Him, so that God may be all things in all."

Quite clearly then:

1. According to the promises of Jesus, there is a time coming when the saints will be ruling as judges over the nations, and over the twelve tribes of Israel.

2. This will only be given to those who have overcome and who have kept the words of Christ to the end.

3. This is before the Great White Throne, for at the time of the Great White Throne, Christ will cause all rule and authority and power to cease, and Jesus promises to those who overcome and keep His words to the end, that "to him I will give power over the nations. And he will rule (Greek ποιμαίνω poimaínō shepherd) them with a rod of iron, as the vessels of a potter they will be broken to pieces, even as I received from My Father."

5. The Greek word which translates into English as "a thousand years" in Revelation 20 is χιλιάς (chiliás), and it denotes a one-thousand year period, and cannot be interpreted as symbolically meaning thousands of years which parallel the age in-between Pentecost and the appearance of Christ in His glory, without defying all the rules of grammar.

6. In Matthew 25:31-46, Jesus is seated on the throne of His glory, and all nations have been gathered before Him, to be judged.

In this passage, the Lord is judging them according to how they treated those whom He calls His brothers, saying that as they did to them, they did to Him.

NOTICE:-

(A) They are being judged by their works, just as at the time of the Great White throne following the close of the millennium in Revelation 20 - but this is happening at the appearance of Christ at the end of this age.

(B) In the Revelation, after death and hades have delivered up all the dead still in them, these too, are judged by their works, and those whose names are still not found in the Lamb's Book of Life at that point, are thrown into the Lake of Fire, just as Mat 25:46 states will happen to those nations on the left.

(C) The saints are not judged by their works.

(D) In Mat 25:31-46 those who treated the saints well, are called "righteous" and "blessed of my Father" by the Lord (Mat 25:34, 37).

(E) The same people as in (D) "inherit the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world." (Mat 25:33).

(F) There is no reason to assume that the events of Mat.25:31-46 will take place at the end of this age when Christ appears in the clouds and gathers His elect, but there is also no reason to assume that these events will not happen at that time.

"First Resurrection".

The Greek word egeírō (ἐγείρω) is one of the the verbs found in the New Testament, very often used in reference to the bodily rising again from death. When syn appears prefixed to egeírō (synegeírō), it shows that the resurrection of the individual believer in Christ is something which occurs with Christ's resurrection. It's the same prefix we get with words like synthesis and synchronize.

Colossians 3:1
"If ye then be risen with [συνεγείρω synegeírō] Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God."

Compare this with Romans 6:5:
"For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:"

There is only one resurrection - and Christ is the resurrection and the Life:

John 11:23-26
"Jesus said to her, Your brother shall rise again.

Martha said to Him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day.

Jesus said to her, I am the Resurrection and the Life! He who believes in Me, though he die, yet he shall live.
And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?"


Christ is the resurrection and the Life. Any resurrection to take place after Christ's, takes place because of Christ's resurrection and with (synegeírō) His resurrection. There is no "second" resurrection (or third, or fourth). Those who rise from the dead when Christ appears are those who are Christ's at His coming, according to Paul in I Corinthians 15:22-26:

"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all will be made alive.

But each in his own order: Christ the first-fruit, and afterward they who are Christ's at His coming;

then is the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God, even the Father; when He makes to cease all rule and all authority and power.
for it is right for Him to reign until He has put all the enemies under His feet.

The last enemy made to cease is death."


THE OVERLAP

Therefore not only in Matthew 25:31-46, but in many New Testament verses speaking about judgment unto life or death, there is an overlap - with BOTH a literal thousand-year reign of the saints in the Kingdom of Christ following the judgment, AND the New Heavens and New Earth following the judgment.

I realize that A-mills will find this hard to accept, because their minds are stuck in a two-dimensional, linear approach to "time", but it CAN be both.

One one hand, there is a reign of Christ coming, and the resurrected saints with Him, when Satan is bound (truly bound) and shut up in the abyss (truly shut up in it), unable to deceive the nations until the thousand years are finished, because he will be totally incapacitated during the thousand years.

There will be one final rebellion when Satan has been released again, and goes out deceiving the nations again, gathering the nations in the four corners of the earth - Gog and Magog - against the camp of the saints, and this rebellion is brought to an end when fire comes down from heaven and devours them (unlike when the beast and false prophet were thrown into the lake of fire a thousand years earlier).

Yet the Kingdom of Christ exists now in the world, has existed for 2,000 years and will exist forever. He is the One who is, who was and who is to come, the Almighty.

The universe has always been the Kingdom which belongs to God, and if the King allows an adversary to cause havoc in His Kingdom, then it's because:

"For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor your ways My ways, says the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts.
For as the rain comes down, and the snow from the heavens, and does not return there, but waters the earth, and makes it bring out and bud, and give seed to the sower and bread to the eater;
so shall My word be, which goes out of My mouth; it shall not return to Me void, but it shall accomplish what I please, and it shall certainly do what I sent it to do."
Isaiah 55:8-11

If the King of a Kingdom wants to prevent His adversary from creating havoc in His Kingdom, He would need to either bind His adversary and lock him in a dungeon, OR destroy him.

If a murderer who has been in prison for 20 years claims he is rehabilitated and pleads for his release, promising to go and serve humanity afterward, and is released on probation to see what he will do, but then goes out and murders someone again, would the state be just if it gives the man the death penalty the second time around?

Would our King need to bind His adversary and lock Him in a dungeon if the King wanted to rule over His Kingdom unhindered by an adversary? And if our King released His adversary again on probation after a thousand years to see what he will do, and then destroys His adversary in the lake of fire after His adversary goes out committing the exact same acts of sinful rebellion against God again, would our King be just?

The Kingdom of Christ has already come. The Kingdom of Christ is coming. The Kingdom of Christ just IS: Christ is He who is, who was, and who is to come, the Almighty. The NHNE is linked to "no time" (a.k.a "eternity"). Eternity is not "coming in the future". Eternity IS, WAS and it IS TO COME. If "No-time" (a.k.a "eternity") is the air, then "time" is one aspect of the contents of the gas balloon floating around in the air. Time is linked to the activities, events, cycles of birth, life and death in the creation, in the universe.

Hence the removal of the curse was accomplished and completed by Christ Himself in His death and resurrection. It's not something that "will only be in the future when the NHNE comes". And certain things overlap, as can be seen from what happened twice before on the exact same day of the year, and as can be seen by what has been said regarding John the Baptist and Elijah:

Jerusalem destroyed by fire Tisha B-Av.png


Elijah.png


GOSPEL TIME.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DavidPT
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The numbers are symbolic of exact numbers. God only knows. Perhaps that song was written for today. It is pretty tough being a virgin these days.

Those living around 30AD were on both sides of the Cross. They are all firstfruits of the first coming.


Where are you going to now find the pure bloodlines of the Northern tribes taken into captivity hundreds of years before the time of Christ?


"God only knows" is not an answer.


Why are you ignoring what Paul said about genealogies in Titus 3:9?


.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: jgr
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
(F) There is no reason to assume that the events of Mat.25:31-46 will take place at the end of this age when Christ appears in the clouds and gathers His elect, but there is also no reason to assume that these events will not happen at that time.
Matthew 25:31 When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne.

"First Resurrection".

The Greek word egeírō (ἐγείρω) is one of the the verbs found in the New Testament, very often used in reference to the bodily rising again from death. When syn appears prefixed to egeírō (synegeírō), it shows that the resurrection of the individual believer in Christ is something which occurs with Christ's resurrection. It's the same prefix we get with words like synthesis and synchronize.

Colossians 3:1
"If ye then be risen with [συνεγείρω synegeírō] Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God."

Compare this with Romans 6:5:
"For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:"

There is only one resurrection - and Christ is the resurrection and the Life:

John 11:23-26
"Jesus said to her, Your brother shall rise again.

Martha said to Him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day.

Jesus said to her, I am the Resurrection and the Life! He who believes in Me, though he die, yet he shall live.
And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?"


Christ is the resurrection and the Life. Any resurrection to take place after Christ's, takes place because of Christ's resurrection and with (synegeírō) His resurrection. There is no "second" resurrection (or third, or fourth). Those who rise from the dead when Christ appears are those who are Christ's at His coming, according to Paul in I Corinthians 15:22-26:

"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all will be made alive.

But each in his own order: Christ the first-fruit, and afterward they who are Christ's at His coming;

then is the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God, even the Father; when He makes to cease all rule and all authority and power.
for it is right for Him to reign until He has put all the enemies under His feet.

The last enemy made to cease is death."
How can you say there is no second resurrection? A first resurrection implies a second. The first resurrection unto bodily immortality was Christ's resurrection. The next one (the second one) will be the resurrection of those who are His at His second coming. At that time death will be swallowed up in victory (1 Cor 15:54 - fulfillment of Isaiah 25:8). How can that not be the fulfillment of the ultimate defeat of death mentioned in 1 Cor 15:26?
THE OVERLAP

Therefore not only in Matthew 25:31-46, but in many New Testament verses speaking about judgment unto life or death, there is an overlap - with BOTH a literal thousand-year reign of the saints in the Kingdom of Christ following the judgment, AND the New Heavens and New Earth following the judgment.

I realize that A-mills will find this hard to accept, because their minds are stuck in a two-dimensional, linear approach to "time", but it CAN be both.

One one hand, there is a reign of Christ coming, and the resurrected saints with Him, when Satan is bound (truly bound) and shut up in the abyss (truly shut up in it), unable to deceive the nations until the thousand years are finished, because he will be totally incapacitated during the thousand years.
Do you know that the fallen angels (Satan is a fallen angel as well) were bound in everlasting chains long ago?

Jude 1:6 And the angels who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their proper dwelling—these he has kept in darkness, bound with everlasting chains for judgment on the great Day.

2 Peter 2:4 For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell (Greek: Tartarus - deepest abyss of hell), putting them in chains of darkness to be held for judgment;

Long ago, many angels fell from their positions of authority in heaven. This included Satan who is their leader (Rev 9:11, Rev 12:9, Matt 25:41). Notice that scripture says they were long ago "bound in everlasting chains". And, yet, that did not prevent them from doing anything or from deceiving at all. Clearly, their binding is only in a figurative or spiritual sense and not in a literal sense as if it would be no different than a bound physical being.

Jude and Peter's understanding of what it means for a fallen angel to be bound is much different than premil's. It clearly does not prevent fallen angels from doing anything at all. They are restrained, but not fully incapacitated as premils believe. They can only do what God allows and they cannot (and have not) prevent the spread of the gospel throughout the world and they cannot unite all of the wicked into a mass rebellion against Christ and His church while they are bound.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,725
2,194
indiana
✟334,597.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Even if only Revelation 20 mentions it, the Bible still mentions it. Of all the chapters in the Bible, is Revelation 20 the only one you consider not part of scripture?

Is this a real question? I have been demonstrating by belief on revelation 20 this whole time. Just because I don't believe it literally, as you do, doesn't mean I don't believe it. Let's avoid comments like this.

IMHO, it is inappropriate to form a doctrine based on one passage, especially if the passage is found in a highly symbolic and apocalyptic book.


The Greek word egeírō (ἐγείρω) is one of the the verbs found in the New Testament, very often used in reference to the bodily rising again from death. When syn appears prefixed to egeírō (synegeírō), it shows that the resurrection of the individual believer in Christ is something which occurs with Christ's resurrection. It's the same prefix we get with words like synthesis and synchronize.


It's also used to indicate a raising that has already occurred for the believer who partakes in Christ's death and resurrection: from spiritual death to spiritual life.

"Have been raised" = past tense verb

Colossians 3:1 If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God.

"made us alive" and "raised us up" = past tense verbs
Ephesians 2:5-6 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved—and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,

"made alive" = past tense verb
Colossians 2:13 and you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses,


2 raisings are mentioned, spiritual and bodily. For just as we were baptized in death with Christ and raised with him to walk in the newness of the life, so shall we be united with Him in the resurrection from the dead. "walk in newness of life" is a past tense verb, while "we shall" be united is a future tense verb
Romans 6:4-5 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.
For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.

Such is consistent with the teachings of Jesus, whos said the hour is "NOW HERE" when the dead were hearing the voice of God and living AND the hour was coming when the dead would come out of the tombs to the resurrection of life and the resurrection of judgment.

John 5:25-29 Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming, 1.) and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. And he has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of Man. Do not marvel at this, 2.) for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment.

Christ is the resurrection and the Life. Any resurrection to take place after Christ's and because of Christ's, is part of the first resurrection, and takes place with Christ's resurrection. This is New Testament teaching (and therefore is expressed in the Greek New Testament also):

I agree that Christ is the resurrection and life.

John 11:25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life

And we appear to agree that Christ is the first resurrection. We have multiple passages that state Christ is first born of the dead/first fruits from the dead.

Colossians 1:18 And He is the head of the body, the church; He is the beginning and firstborn from among the dead, so that in all things He may have preeminence.

1 corinthians 15:20 But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.

1 corinthians 15:23 But each in his own turn: Christ the firstfruits; then at His coming, those who belong to Him.

But you seem to be arguing that the partaking in the first resurrection is only a future event, at the bodily resurrection (of the good only?) when Christ returns.

However, the NT declares that partaking in Christ death and resurrection (the first resurrection) is a present reality, as Paul states we have already been raised with Christ through being born again, as Jesus states we will never die if we believe in him, and Peter states we are already a kingdom of priests.


Colossians 3:1 If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God.

Ephesians 2:5-6 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved—and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,

Colossians 2:13 and you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses,

1 Peter 2:9 But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.

John 11;25-26 Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?


You don't have a "second" resurrection. Those who rise from the dead when Christ appears are those who are Christ's at His coming, according to Paul in I Corinthians 15, and so your point is 100% muted by scripture.

If you choose to ignore the gospel and epistolic scriptures that state we have already been raised with Christ (born again), that by believing in Jesus we will never die, or that we are already a kingdom of priests to God, or that Christ is already reingin, then sure....my point is 100% muted.

At the close of the (totally literal) thousand years, death and hades deliver up all the dead that are still in them. Even if there is a resurrection at that time, when those who believed in Christ during their mortal lives and who lived during the millennium, are raised, it's part of the first resurrection - because the resurrection of all those who belong to Christ is a result of their synegeírō - their having been raised with Christ.

The bodily resurrection of believers, occurs at Jesus' coming, which is the same time that Jesus rewards those for what they have done, whether good or bad.

1 corinthians 15:23 But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then at his coming those who belong to Christ

Revelation 20:12-15 And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Then another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done. And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them, and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done. Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

1.) All of us will stand before the judgment seat of Christ to receive what we have done for our works, whether good or bad.
2 corinthians 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil.

2.) This occurs at the coming of Christ
Revelation 22:12 “Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense with me, to repay each one for what he has done

Matthew 16: 22 For the Son of Man is going to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay each person according to what he has done.

3.) this occurs at the end of the age, after the good and bad have grown together.
Matthew 13:41-42 The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers, and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear.

Can you explain to me how this works in the premil doctrine?



This is New Testament teaching, and always has been - so scripture mutes your point.

I mean, I agree the First resurrection is Christ, I have been saying this the whole time. So that point isn't muted.

The disagreement seems to be when do we partake in this First resurrection.

You say at the 2nd coming based on literally reading revelation 20.

I say the first coming based on interpreting revelation 20 through the gospels and epistles

So in order to mute my point, you'll have to demonstrate that the gospels and epistles don't establish that we have been raised with Christ to never die if we believe in him, that we are not yet a kingdom of priests, and the Christ is not yet reigning.



 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
But they didn't teach things that only they believed the way you seem to do.

I am not teaching or preaching. I did not write any books, or letters. The point is about private interpretation. "Only they believed" is a pretty specific statement. No one believed what Paul wrote before he wrote it. I am trying to get people to think about all the false theology Satan has been feeding the church, so they can reject it and prepare for the Second Coming. People defending their beliefs seems an exercise in futility.

The original truth comes from God who gave the information to the authors of the Bible. There isn't just one person who sees Revelation as a series of recapitulations.

Recap is extra biblical devotional thought process. It is still private and not inspired of the Holy Spirit. It is not Scripture, but an interpretational view of Scripture.

None of them taught anything that no one else believed the way you seem to do. Such as you implying earlier that Satan would overcome Christ and the church at some point. What other Christian would ever dream of saying that Satan could ever overcome Christ? None. That is my point. All these other people you mentioned didn't teach things that no one else believed.

I am fine with that. I'm just concerned about all the times you make claims that no one else believes. Doesn't that concern you?

Anyway, enough about that. Carry on. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Revelation 13:7
7 "it was allowed to make war on God’s holy people and to defeat them; and it was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation."

Not my words to defend. God allowed it. Even if you disagree with God.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Where are you going to now find the pure bloodlines of the Northern tribes taken into captivity hundreds of years before the time of Christ?

"God only knows" is not an answer.

Why are you ignoring what Paul said about genealogies in Titus 3:9?
Why are you ignoring God's plan? I am not God. I am not sealing 144k Jewish male virgins, 12,000 from the named tribes. God is. Where is God going to find His chosen disciples? Would it be impossible for God?
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Recap is extra biblical devotional thought process. It is still private and not inspired of the Holy Spirit. It is not Scripture, but an interpretational view of Scripture.
You don't seem to understand what having a private interpretation means. It means that you hold to views that only you have and no one else. Many people see recapitulations in Revelation and not just me, so that is not a private interpretation.

Revelation 13:7
7 "it was allowed to make war on God’s holy people and to defeat them; and it was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation."

Not my words to defend. God allowed it. Even if you disagree with God.
Where does that say anything about Satan defeating Christ? It only mentions God's people.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I mean, I agree the First resurrection is Christ, I have been saying this the whole time. So that point isn't muted.

The disagreement seems to be when do we partake in this First resurrection.

You say at the 2nd coming based on literally reading revelation 20.

I say the first coming based on interpreting revelation 20 through the gospels and epistles

So in order to mute my point, you'll have to demonstrate that the gospels and epistles don't establish that we have been raised with Christ to never die if we believe in him, that we are not yet a kingdom of priests, and the Christ is not yet reigning.
Why? Life itself is proof Jesus Christ is not present in this life. There is not a physical kingdom, and Christ is not reigning in Jerusalem. Nor is all the church present.

You cannot even prove the kingdom will ever be on earth. Paradise is not on earth. It never will be on earth, as far as we know from Scripture. Show me one verse that says the church leaves Paradise and returns to earth. Your point is mute, because it has no Scriptural proof. It is interpretation of verses that do not even deal with the church.

Revelation 20 is not the resurrection of the Church. Christ was the physical resurrection of the church. That is what your verses do prove. You contradict your own point. You accept the physical resurrection of Jesus. You accept those in Christ are resurrected with Christ. Then you try to find a verse that goes totally against those two points. There is no verse in the Bible that can do that.

Can you give one good reason that Revelation 20 has the church standing before thrones being judged, so they can be resurrected? The church was already resurrected and judged on the Cross in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
You don't seem to understand what having a private interpretation means. It means that you hold to views that only you have and no one else. Many people see recapitulations in Revelation and not just me, so that is not a private interpretation.

That is not what private means. Private means outside of the Holy Spirit. Recap is a private interpretation because it did not come from the Holy Spirit. Private does not mean a personal belief that you reject because it makes you feel your belief is wrong.
Where does that say anything about Satan defeating Christ? It only mentions God's people.

Christ was not defeated neither were the 144k. You really take symbolism literal, when it makes a point? I take it literal all the time, when it needs to be taken literally. Revelation 13 is symbolic of God allowing Satan to destroy this earth for 42 months. Why, do you think Christ and the 144k would just sit there in Jerusalem and eat popcorn for 42 months, "enjoying" the show?
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That is not what private means. Private means outside of the Holy Spirit. Recap is a private interpretation because it did not come from the Holy Spirit. Private does not mean a personal belief that you reject because it makes you feel your belief is wrong.
Whatever you want to call it when someone has a belief all to themselves that no one else believes, that's what I'm talking about.

Christ was not defeated neither were the 144k.
Okay, thanks for clarifying.

You really take symbolism literal, when it makes a point? I take it literal all the time, when it needs to be taken literally. Revelation 13 is symbolic of God allowing Satan to destroy this earth for 42 months. Why, do you think Christ and the 144k would just sit there in Jerusalem and eat popcorn for 42 months, "enjoying" the show?
I have no idea what you're talking about, but that's okay. I'm just glad that you were not actually saying that you believe Satan will defeat Christ at some point.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Why are you ignoring God's plan? I am not God. I am not sealing 144k Jewish male virgins, 12,000 from the named tribes. God is. Where is God going to find His chosen disciples? Would it be impossible for God?

He's sealing far more and better than that.

The Church and the 144,000

Revelation 7:3-4 describe the 144,000 as “sealed.” That description is reserved in the NT for believers in Christ – His Body and Bride – the Church:

2 Corinthians 1:21-22
Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and anointed us is God, who also sealed us and gave us the Spirit in our hearts as a pledge.

Ephesians 1:13
In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise,

Ephesians 4:30
Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.


The Revelation 7 passage is therefore conveying the insight that the OT Israelitish faithful saints of God are included under the NT banner of the Church. This is further confirmed by the meanings of the names of the listed tribes and substitutes (Levi and Joseph replacing Dan and Ephraim), describing spiritual qualities and experiences of those who comprise the Church:
Similarly, the meanings of the names of Dan and Ephraim convey the reasons for their exclusion:
Satan in the guise of the serpent was responsible for the fall of mankind in Genesis 3, and for the bruising of Messiah's heel in Scripture's first recorded prophecy of Genesis 3:15. It was the same serpent Satan whose head Messiah bruised at Calvary.
  • Ephraim means “fruitful in the land of mine affliction” (Genesis 41:52)
The reference to “the land of mine affliction” in Ephraim's name's meaning is to that of Egypt, which in Scripture is both a literal and spiritual reality and symbol of bondage. But the Church, God's Chosen People, do not inhabit a land of spiritual affliction and bondage. Rather, they inhabit the Heavenly Jerusalem on Mount Sion (Hebrews 12:22,23), located in the Heavenly Country that God has prepared for the faithful (Hebrews 11:16).

Of additional significance is the order in which the names are presented, differing from the usual presentation by order of birth. In particular, Judah appears first, in recognition of its role as the tribal progenitor of Christ, the Lion of Judah.

While rebellion and apostasy were repetitive afflictions of the OT Israelites, there were still thousands who remained faithful (1 Kings 19:18). Their number is depicted as 12, a scriptural value representing faithfulness; multiplied by 12, representing the faithful from each of the twelve tribes; multiplied by 1,000 representing the indeterminate but large number (Psalms 50:10; Psalms 91:7; Revelation 5:11) of the total faithful in Israel; thus, 144,000.

Revelation 14 continues the descriptions further reflecting the qualities and experiences of the redeemed – the Church. Absent here is any mention of tribal, ethnic, or other distinctions, thus conveying the reality of the inclusivity and unity of the NT Church which now embraces both Israelite and Gentile. Its number can also be depicted as 12, representing faithfulness; multipled by 12 representing the 12 faithful apostles, who with the prophets comprise the foundation of the NT church, with Christ as the Chief Cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20); multiplied by 1,000 representing the indeterminate but large number of the total faithful in the NT Church; thus, also 144,000.

The NT Church's inclusivity and unity are declared in the following:

Galatians 3:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Ephesians 2:14
For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the barrier of the dividing wall…

Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.


The 144,00 are described as celibate, meaning that as the Bride of Christ, they are not defiled by adultery with the world (James 4:4). They sing a new song of deliverance and victory. They follow Christ wherever He goes. Their residence is heavenly Jerusalem on Mount Zion. (Hebrews 12:22)

No doubt about it…the Church is written all over the 144,000.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Spiritual Jew
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
He's sealing far more and better than that.

The Church and the 144,000

Revelation 7:3-4 describe the 144,000 as “sealed.” That description is reserved in the NT for believers in Christ – His Body and Bride – the Church:

2 Corinthians 1:21-22
Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and anointed us is God, who also sealed us and gave us the Spirit in our hearts as a pledge.

Ephesians 1:13
In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise,

Ephesians 4:30
Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.


The Revelation 7 passage is therefore conveying the insight that the OT Israelitish faithful saints of God are included under the NT banner of the Church. This is further confirmed by the meanings of the names of the listed tribes and substitutes (Levi and Joseph replacing Dan and Ephraim), describing spiritual qualities and experiences of those who comprise the Church:
Similarly, the meanings of the names of Dan and Ephraim convey the reasons for their exclusion:
Satan in the guise of the serpent was responsible for the fall of mankind in Genesis 3, and for the bruising of Messiah's heel in Scripture's first recorded prophecy of Genesis 3:15. It was the same serpent Satan whose head Messiah bruised at Calvary.
  • Ephraim means “fruitful in the land of mine affliction” (Genesis 41:52)
The reference to “the land of mine affliction” in Ephraim's name's meaning is to that of Egypt, which in Scripture is both a literal and spiritual reality and symbol of bondage. But the Church, God's Chosen People, do not inhabit a land of spiritual affliction and bondage. Rather, they inhabit the Heavenly Jerusalem on Mount Sion (Hebrews 12:22,23), located in the Heavenly Country that God has prepared for the faithful (Hebrews 11:16).

Of additional significance is the order in which the names are presented, differing from the usual presentation by order of birth. In particular, Judah appears first, in recognition of its role as the tribal progenitor of Christ, the Lion of Judah.

While rebellion and apostasy were repetitive afflictions of the OT Israelites, there were still thousands who remained faithful (1 Kings 19:18). Their number is depicted as 12, a scriptural value representing faithfulness; multiplied by 12, representing the faithful from each of the twelve tribes; multiplied by 1,000 representing the indeterminate but large number (Psalms 50:10; Psalms 91:7; Revelation 5:11) of the total faithful in Israel; thus, 144,000.

Revelation 14 continues the descriptions further reflecting the qualities and experiences of the redeemed – the Church. Absent here is any mention of tribal, ethnic, or other distinctions, thus conveying the reality of the inclusivity and unity of the NT Church which now embraces both Israelite and Gentile. Its number can also be depicted as 12, representing faithfulness; multipled by 12 representing the 12 faithful apostles, who with the prophets comprise the foundation of the NT church, with Christ as the Chief Cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20); multiplied by 1,000 representing the indeterminate but large number of the total faithful in the NT Church; thus, also 144,000.

The NT Church's inclusivity and unity are declared in the following:

Galatians 3:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Ephesians 2:14
For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the barrier of the dividing wall…

Colossians 3:11
Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.


The 144,00 are described as celibate, meaning that as the Bride of Christ, they are not defiled by adultery with the world (James 4:4). They sing a new song of deliverance and victory. They follow Christ wherever He goes. Their residence is heavenly Jerusalem on Mount Zion. (Hebrews 12:22)

No doubt about it…the Church is written all over the 144,000.
No doubt about it that the church was raptured and presented to God as one body in Paradise before 144k males were sealed on the earth.

Are they part of the church before the final seal is opened? Yes, but they are not glorified and in Paradise. They have a task on earth to do. The church is in Paradise with God forever. The 6th seal is the end of the church on earth. The 7th seal is the beginning of the 144k on the earth. Why conflate the two groups when John took the effort to define and point out that the church was complete and with God, and the 144k were sealed and on the earth with the Lamb?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.