Sure. But I remember what it was like before some of these rules were passed, when the death rate was much higher. I think that's an improvement. You don't. Or maybe you do -- you haven't offered any kind of explanation for what safety regulations are acceptable and what aren't. All I've learned that a piece of cloth on your face is a really big curtailment of your liberty. Are you able to state a reason that this regulation is so much worse than all of the others you accept?
Ok, your the random pick at the moment to get a reply. I have a little bit of time. After this I gotta go to bed.
SOME of the other regulations I accept, not ALL the other regulations.
But yes, why i reject the mask regulation is because its first of all an order and not a law.
second, even if it wer a law it wouldnt matter because its not based on solid proof. Such as the death count isn't totally proven and is even an admitted assumption by the CDC.
Thirdly, the masks working have mixed evidence to them.
Fourthly like I already mentioned everyone should have there own choice. If you dont fear the virus, you take the risk and hold no one liable. If you fear the virus then you take the precautions and resume no risk.
In that vein, I note that you didn't answer my question: do you go around naked in the summer because freedom is more important than imposed modesty? Do you approve of others going naked?
Me going around naked is irrelevant because if it wer not against the law I would STILL wear clothes.
Do I think others should wear clothes to? Yes. But should it be the law? Perhaps so in order to prevent a spike in rape. But mayby not, mayby everyone should have there own choice. Resume risk or wear clothes out of fear. I would bet MOST would wear clothes even if it wasn't the law.
Let me clarify when I say resume risk there. They risk a higher chance of rape. But since rape is an intended crime, the rapist shoulf still be punished.
A asymptomatic Carrier of a virus is not an intended murderer.
