Sure
You quoted the 1 Corinthains 13
9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part; 10 but when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part shall be done away.
11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I felt as a child, I thought as a child: now that I am become a man, I have put away childish things.
12 For now we see in a mirror, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know fully even as also I was fully known.
1A) I think it is a hard case to make that the perfect has come. Some people claim it is the full canon of scripture etc. and that itself is another claim that is hard to make (We have had the full canon of scripture for 1600 years and all kinds of problems)
1B)) Verses 11 and 12 I think point to what my interpretation of the passage, is the "perfect" refers to when we enter "The life to come", "paradise", full Communion with God. It is very easy to make a case that the Gifts are rendered obsolete in that instance. e.g. healing is not needed when you have a perfect, eternal glorified body.
2) Continuationism also does not necessarily equate to endorsing the Charismatic movement., Pentecostalism etc. even though it does get lumped in with that by some people. All it means is that the Supernatural aspects of the Bible as far as miracles etc. have not officially ended etc.
3) The History of Cessiationism is another strike against it.
This was never something taught by Christians historically speaking. Saint Augustine speculated that it might be true at one time in his life because their were few reports of miracles in his day, but
Cessationism did not become a thing until a Roman Catholic Apologist debated John Calvin, and John Calvin invented it to get around that he and some of the Reformers did not have miracles to validate their ministry.
4) I would actually point to the question of strict Scriptural constructionism. If you are a Protestant Sola Scriptura etc. is suppose to be important even necessary. Aren't things suppose to be established in the presence of "2 or 3 witnesses"? There are a lot of reasons why 1 Corinthians 13 does not qualify, but even if it did that is only one passage.....
On the positive end, I can make a case on why things should be in effect based on things like 1) the nature of God, 2) the nature of Church, 3) that we have not entered perfection, the life to come etc. yet.
People tend to base their belief on Cessasionism on experience rather than scripture....
Well that is what I got so far.....