- Nov 21, 2008
- 51,471
- 10,708
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
I posted this
Where I specifically answered your question. starting with my statement "Given that this has never been how someone has ever been saved -" which a direct answer to your "do you believe you must be circumcised to be saved" question.
Did you also mean to add "Do you think people need to stop taking God's name in vain to be saved?""
=====================
Where I specifically answered your question. starting with my statement "Given that this has never been how someone has ever been saved -" which a direct answer to your "do you believe you must be circumcised to be saved" question.
I am wondering how this extra focus on the "disconnect" is helping your point.
Who said God abolished His definition of sin?
Do you believe a person must become physically circumcised and keep the law of Moses, to be saved?
JLB
Given that this has never been how someone has ever been saved - is it your belief that this unchanged fact - somehow deletes commands like "do not take God's name in vain"??
Is that what Christ teaches in Mark 7:6-13?
Where I specifically answered your question. starting with my statement "Given that this has never been how someone has ever been saved -" which a direct answer to your "do you believe you must be circumcised to be saved" question.
Did you also mean to add "Do you think people need to stop taking God's name in vain to be saved?""
=====================
I’m still waiting for you to answer my first question Bob.
Where I specifically answered your question. starting with my statement "Given that this has never been how someone has ever been saved -" which a direct answer to your "do you believe you must be circumcised to be saved" question.
I am wondering how this extra focus on the "disconnect" is helping your point.
Upvote
0