• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why discuss Calvinism vs Arminianism in Evangelism? Starts with Definitions

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟947,585.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Zero conditions for choosing= random choosing. If I choose people from a crowd, unconditionally, it would have to be totally random, otherwise, there would be conditions.

God is not choosing from a crowd. He chose from the foundation of the world. He MADE his chosen, and did not choose them on any condition of worthiness on their part, but for what was his purpose for them.

Again, the Reformers were specific about what they meant by "unconditional". You simply want to argue semantics, putting your words to the definition of "unconditional" as if that was their doctrine. You are presenting a false case. You once again, as always, fail to disqualify Reformed Theology.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jimmyjimmy
Upvote 0

jimmyjimmy

Pardoned Rebel
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2015
11,556
5,727
USA
✟257,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Do babies sin? I understand that Adam's sin is why all death happens. But that doesn't mean we can't choose spiritual life.

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. (1 Corinthians 2:14)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

renniks

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2008
10,682
3,449
✟156,970.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. (1 Corinthians 2:14)
But the man under conviction can.
John 16:8 “And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment.”
 
Upvote 0

Josheb

Christian
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
2,609
964
NoVa
✟267,765.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thank you very much for the "heads up".
I just can't buy the "no choice" position.
It makes it seem like God is picking who will, and perhaps more importantly, who won't be saved.

I'm going to investigate Pelagius.
I encourage every to familiarize themselves with their own position and the alternatives. As I noted early on in this op the most frequently occurring error in discussions is posters not correctly understanding the soteriological positions and arguing straw men. My observation, believe it or not, is this happens most often with one's own argument!

Pelagius believed common grace was sufficient, and the effects of sin were not sufficient, to enable sinful humans to seek and find salvation in their own might. A significant resistance to his views arose and Augustine was asked to address the matter. 1100 years later a similar debate arose between Luther and Erasmus.

Arminius did not argue against God picking who gets saved. This is another misbegotten idea in soteriology. For Arminius God picked those who, having been sufficiently liberated to respond, then chose Him. Arminianism does not dispute God as causal nor God as sovereign, not does it deny God's action throughout the whole process. Arminius had been a Calvinist apologist for something like 20 years before he began to part ways with Calvin.

Phil, you say you "can't buy the 'no choice' position. Do you "buy" the fact sin does not give you a choice? . Or is it only God you have problems with giving you no choice?


I recommend you give most post #193 in this op a read, especially that list of six premises I provided where Arminianism makes eisegetic inferences.
 
Upvote 0

Ilikecats

Active Member
Dec 27, 2019
185
70
29
Alberta
✟64,744.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But the man under conviction can.
John 16:8 “And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment.”
That’s talking about the Holy Spirit convicting men of their sins. The natural man doesn’t possess the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0

renniks

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2008
10,682
3,449
✟156,970.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Pelagius believed common grace was sufficient, and the effects of sin were not sufficient, to enable sinful humans to seek and find salvation in their own might. A significant resistance to his views arose and Augustine was asked to address the matter. 1100 years later a similar debate arose between Luther and Erasmus.
Do we really know what Pelagias believed or only what Augustine said he believed?
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟947,585.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Zero conditions for choosing= random choosing. If I choose people from a crowd, unconditionally, it would have to be totally random, otherwise, there would be conditions.
I find it telling that you want to qualify God's actions according to your own. You are not God. You have no standing by which to measure him.
 
Upvote 0

renniks

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2008
10,682
3,449
✟156,970.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I find it telling that you want to qualify God's actions according to your own. You are not God. You have no standing by which to measure him.
I'm not speaking of what God actually does here, but what the fatalism of Calvinism claims he does.
 
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
15,916
3,981
✟385,105.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
This thread is not intended to be so much a round-and-round debate (though that could happen) but rather to "get the definitions on the table".

Essentially it is the issue of whether the Gospel invitation is for all - and "whosoever will" or is it a "selection" system where God "Selects" some for salvation and simply fails to select others thus God is the only actor/determination and the choice of the lost person is not a factor that determines anything at all.

The arminian model is an open system... where the Gospel is open to all "if anyone hears my voice and opens the door - I will come in" Rev 3.

The Calvinist model is one where God pre-selects those He is willing to save ... a selection that has nothing at all to do with the person selected.

In any case this thread is here for "the definitions".

It is not hurtful to either side - to be able to define from scripture what the point is on each side.

=====================================================
In Arminianism free will exists because of the supernatural act of God in "drawing all mankind unto Him" John 12:32 and as a result we have

Evangelism where "we BEG you on behalf of Christ be reconciled to God" 2 Cor 5
Evangelism where it is not God's WILL that ANY should perish (2 Peter 3) and yet only 'the FEW' of Matthew 7 are ultimately saved?
Evangelism where Christ "is the Atoning Sacrifice for OUR sins and NOT for our sins only but for the sins of the WHOLE WORLD" 1 John 2:2
Evangelism where "God so LOVED the WORLD that He gave.."... yes really?
Evangelism where "God sent His Son to be the Savior of the WORLD" 1 John 4:14?

And when someone chooses to be lost anyway God's response is
Evangelism where "he came to His own and His OWN received Him not" John 1:11
Evangelism where Christ laments "Oh Jerusalem .. how I WANTED to spare your children.. but YOU would not"? Matt 23
He laments - "what more could I have done than that which I have already done?" Isaiah 5:4


Notice where the focus of "action" is in Rom 10

Rom 10: "9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; 10 for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation."

========================== Calvinism============
I will leave it to Calvinists to post the texts that they feel define Calvinism's view of evangelism.

But I have seen this offered in the past (I think you have to use some significant degree of inference to get to Calvinism in these texts)
===========================================

Acts 18
4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded both Jews and Greeks.
5But when Silas and Timothy came down from Macedonia, Paul began devoting himself completely to the word, solemnly testifying to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ. 6But when they resisted and blasphemed, he shook out his garments and said to them, “Your blood be on your own heads! I am clean. From now on I will go to the Gentiles.” 7Then he left there and went to the house of a man named Titius Justus, a worshiper of God, whose house was next to the synagogue. 8Crispus, the leader of the synagogue, believed in the Lord with all his household, and many of the Corinthians when they heard were believing and being baptized. 9And the Lord said to Paul in the night by a vision, “Do not be afraid any longer, but go on speaking and do not be silent; 10for I am with you, and no man will attack you in order to harm you, for I have many people in this city.” 11And he settled there a year and six months, teaching the word of God among them.



Acts 13

42 So when the Jews went out of the synagogue, the Gentiles begged that these words might be preached to them the next Sabbath.
43 Now when the meeting of the synagogue had broken up, many of the Jews and of the God-fearing proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas, who, speaking to them, were urging them to continue in the grace of God.

44The next Sabbath nearly the whole city assembled to hear the word of the Lord. 45But when the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy and began contradicting the things spoken by Paul, and were blaspheming. 46Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly and said, “It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; since you repudiate it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles.

47 For this is what the LORD has commanded us: "'I have made you a light for the Gentiles, that you may bring salvation to the ends of the earth.'"
48When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed. 49And the word of the Lord was being spread through the whole region. 50But the Jews incited the devout women of prominence and the leading men of the city, and instigated a persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and drove them out of their district. 51But they shook off the dust of their feet in protest against them and went to Iconium. 52And the disciples were continually filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit.

As I understand it - In Calvinism - if you choose salvation and that "makes a difference" then God is deprived of some level of glory/honor and this is one reason they object to the Arminian form of the Gospel.

==========================================

1. BTW two points to remember: - Both Calvinists and Arminians agree that the supernatural drawing of God is more than sufficient to enable all the choice that depravity disables. That is not "the difference" between the two views.

2. Highly subjective summations/condemnation of "the other view" that you do not share - is not considered a compelling form of definition or debate, nor is it accepted by those who do not already agree with you - as proof of anything.
The gospel-and all of Scripture-make little sense to me if salvation has nothing whatsoever to do with man's will, if he's either predestined to heaven or predestined to hell IOW. Instead I'd submit that our faith is all about the human will, that, ever since Adam, God patiently worked with man for centuries, for the very purpose of ultimately grooming and drawing and educating humanity to bring us to the point where we might finally begin to appreciate and accept and embrace the true light when we see it.

And the doctrine of election with double predestination is sort of a moot and speculative point in any case-a matter of putting the cart ahead of the horse- because we cannot know with absolute and perfect certainty just exactly who are numbered among the elect, and who are not, to begin with.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BobRyan
Upvote 0

Ilikecats

Active Member
Dec 27, 2019
185
70
29
Alberta
✟64,744.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
John 16:8And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment.”

Not just a few select people. The world.
Sure he will convict but will he bring personal conviction to every single person in the world?
 
Upvote 0