Anybody concerned about Democrats' age?

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,639
12,105
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟622,572.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
If elected:

Sanders would be 79 at inauguration.
Biden would be 78.

Gabbard would be 39.
Buttigieg would be 39.

These 4 are either too old or too young.
Are you worried about their age?

Bloomberg would be 79 as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrewn
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,354
Clarence Center NY USA
✟237,637.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If elected:

Sanders would be 79 at inauguration.
Biden would be 78.

Gabbard would be 39.
Buttigieg would be 39.

These 4 are either too old or too young.
Are you worried about their age?

No. I'm only worried about their policies.
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,475
USA
✟677,608.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
If elected:

Sanders would be 79 at inauguration.
Biden would be 78.

Gabbard would be 39.
Buttigieg would be 39.

These 4 are either too old or too young.
Are you worried about their age?

No, because there are such things as VP's.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,639
12,105
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟622,572.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
If they have a pulse and there's a D behind their name, they're a better alternative than Trump.

That seems to be about the strongest message any of the dem candidates are running on right now. That might be why Trump is going to win again in 2020.
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,475
USA
✟677,608.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
That seems to be about the strongest message any of the dem candidates are running on right now. That might be why Trump is going to win again in 2020.

Not if that squirrel in my backyard decides to enter the race, he won't!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
If elected:

Sanders would be 79 at inauguration.
Biden would be 78.

Gabbard would be 39.
Buttigieg would be 39.

...making either of these two the youngest president in history if elected, and neither has the qualifications of the two who are next closest (TR Roosevelt and John Kennedy).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrewn
Upvote 0

Melody Suttles

SingPeace
Supporter
Sep 22, 2018
215
394
Atlanta
✟79,254.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
If elected:

Sanders would be 79 at inauguration.
Biden would be 78.

Gabbard would be 39.
Buttigieg would be 39.

These 4 are either too old or too young.
Are you worried about their age?


STROM THURMOND SERVED UNTIL HE WAS 100 YEARS OLD. THE LAST BILL HE VOTED ON, HE WAS CONFINED TO A WHEELCHAIR, AND THE OTHER SENATORS HAD TO HOLD HIS HAND UP. HE HAD NO IDEA WHERE HE WAS. IT WAS A VERY SAD THING TO SEE. IT ALSO MADE ME ANGRY.

ALSO, HOW MANY POLITICIANS GO TO DC WITH UPPER-CLASS INCOMES BUT BECOME MULTI-MILLIONAIRES WITHIN A FEW YEARS? BLAH BLAH BLAH.... YUCK ... I HATE IT!!!!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If elected:

Sanders would be 79 at inauguration.
Biden would be 78.

Gabbard would be 39.
Buttigieg would be 39.

These 4 are either too old or too young.
Are you worried about their age?
Not worried for one second about the younger two. The Geezers leading both parties scare me.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
...making either of these two the youngest president in history if elected, and neither has the qualifications of the two who are next closest (TR Roosevelt and John Kennedy).
Fat and away more qualified than the current President. No contest.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
STROM THURMOND SERVED UNTIL HE WAS 100 YEARS OLD. THE LAST BILL HE VOTED ON, HE WAS CONFINED TO A WHEELCHAIR, AND THE OTHER SENATORS HAD TO HOLD HIS HAND UP. HE HAD NO IDEA WHERE HE WAS. IT WAS A VERY SAD THING TO SEE. IT ALSO MADE ME ANGRY.

ALSO, HOW MANY POLITICIANS GO TO DC WITH UPPER-CLASS INCOMES BUT BECOME MULTI-MILLIONAIRES WITHIN A FEW YEARS? BLAH BLAH BLAH.... YUCK ... I HATE IT!!!!
Why are you shouting?
 
Upvote 0